News Focus
News Focus
icon url

squingeqbob

02/05/14 8:21 AM

#381505 RE: mickeybritt #381504

Thanks for the report, Mickey.
icon url

jist1

02/05/14 8:37 AM

#381506 RE: mickeybritt #381504

Mickey, Yes thanks for the information. Did you ask him if they expect an event to increase the value of their patents? Should we assume that the 868 is the decision to increase their value? Without an event to move the value, then his reason for not selling the patents seems suspicious to me.
---He said the sale of patents was off the shelf because the value of patents declined and that IDCC wasn't going to basically give them away.---
icon url

lockworld

02/05/14 9:08 AM

#381511 RE: mickeybritt #381504

Mickey

Do you think that the proposed SA fail from two years ago was
truly due to IDCC not finding a buyer for the whole
company.
Do you believe it's truly a matter of the declining patent value as a reason for not selling?
My conclusion is that not selling simply serves the company officers interests. They simply don't want to see their company be sold.
Don't cast me as a Mickey basher as I have been in awe of your willingness to take big risks. I truly hope you will be rewarded.
You really have skin in the game as opposed to some of your detractors. Go Mickey!