News Focus
News Focus
icon url

mschere

02/25/03 10:22 AM

#11094 RE: loophole73 #11093

Question..Has it been determined whether IDCC voluntarily submitted the contractual agreements as a supplementary revision to their S-3..or did the SEC initiate the request for additional disclosure? TIA
icon url

bulldzr

02/25/03 10:25 AM

#11096 RE: loophole73 #11093

Loop, great post as usual and right on the money!

"Anybody can just sit around and nitpick all day to conclude that someone has done something wrong when in fact it is form over substance. It is this very attitude that has made every job in America pure drudgery rather than a pleasurable experience. Too many noses in too many people's business... "Motivation by negativity does not win out in the long run.

A lesson learned and practiced daily by the many thousands of effective teachers and winning coaches everywhere, and by successful salesmen, attornies, and managers as well I imagine.
icon url

GAB

02/25/03 10:33 AM

#11098 RE: loophole73 #11093

Loophole...Do you think a response to the SEC on these matters would be a material event requiring the filing of an 8K? Seems like it could have been done with the exhibits being forwarded with a cover letter.
icon url

cls

02/25/03 11:40 AM

#11106 RE: loophole73 #11093

Loop, he is neg for a reason...you should know by now. There are a few on here that want the stock to go the other way.
There seems to be a lot of games being played with stocks as the market is running bearish. I feel like I have been watching a tennis match. Agree totaly about your thoughts on SEC....these guys have been under the gun for years and could be shaking
things up a little. I hope JP response to Jim was all the cards, and we will see some good fruit.
But, just a thought, could this have anything to do with a merger? Just speculating.

best
cls
icon url

ams13sag

02/25/03 12:14 PM

#11119 RE: loophole73 #11093

Loop.

What is the basis of your belief, either you know or you do not, try to be factual.

Regarding your opinion of my posts, they add nothing to this board. Just because you have changed from being the I am sitting on this company, as many of your posts demonstrate, do you need reminding, to the current status of I love this company, and it can do no wrong.

Regarding the Cannes demonstration, how much has it generated, any contracts signed. To date we have two companies paying, one after internationaol arbitration, the other up for renewal. That is factual.

I am pretty sure you will swing in the wind and be anti the company in the near furure.

Regarding individual investors, IDCC and the majority of companies do not heed what we have to say, unless it involves a class action. They have clearly shown lip service with all of the insider trades, compensation etc, to the needs of investors. You claim to be invested in the company for 18 years. Just how long does it take to make a profit, just how long does it take to allign shareholders interests with that of management, do you not consider 18 years and still waiting a tad overdue.
It is time for a reality check.

AMS