Hello, David
"...to prove Libel they have to prove that their was a change in perception about the company. Good luck proving that, just look at shareholders to prove otherwise."
The truth is, David, that I'm a shareholder whose perception about the company changed by reading your posts.
A simple fact. Borne out by my posting history. I've previously stated that I look to you as best representing the reasons why I should not use the current PPS circumstance to add to my position. And to this today, I have not accumulated more shares. Your stated goal of educating the dummies evidently meeting with some success.
The point being that I take exception to your statement that shareholders will prove their perceptions were otherwise changed, than by your input. In my case, that simply isn't true.
And I don't think you can have it both ways, David. You can't spend so much time working toward your stated goal of "educating" investors about the perils of investing in scam companies, and then claim that their perceptions were not changed by your input.
jay