Replies to post #5095 on Atlantis Technology Group (ATNPQ)

[@-@]

Why's it illegal? I dunno if the company is worried or not, but I'm buying at .0003 weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

[QaB2i]

....strongly suggest that you don't give any more legal advice, or if you feel the need to continue _better get a job with ATNO's legal defense team, clearly they need all the help they can get. De Nile is a long river in Egypt.

......your opinion suggests you don't have a clue who can invest, who can sue,why bother to sue, and why corporations that get sued are only going to measure their damages in degrees of loss even if they prevail hence the brave attempt to represent the Corp pro se.

ATNO can afford attorneys,if ATNO can afford to create and file 10Q's and 10K's then they can afford to save this precious equity from being taken over in a default by the incarcerated plaintiff who I understand plans to reverse merger a bar of soap into it.

I dare say that W S and Doo-buy have been reading along with IHUB as they seem to have made good use of their silent moderator for their heavy duty promotion of their imaginary IPTV business earlier this year.


.....strongly suggest that your ATNO MOD days should be over,unless you have a burning desire to protect W S and Doo-buy maybe its time to take your name off......just a thought

you might actually be useful and find out who owns this: www.amekon.us

ALL PACER DOCUMENTS DONATED BY THAT DARN ANONYMOUS_CAT
http://www.box.net/shared/7k7uloxc88





Look I agree that this company did some shady things to its shareholders but lets face it they are not worried one bit about this law suit. You have someone who is already in jail. He has brought law suit after law suit against a number of people and orginizations. He bought stock from behind bars and that in its self is illegal. He runs a website from behind bars where he trys to charge for ad space. This is also illegal. Then he stated back in nov 07 that he felt something was shady with the company and then buys stock months later. Give me a break the judge will throw this out of court IMO












So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish

[Anonymous Nobody]

1. There is nothing "illegal" about an inmate buying shares unless the underlying money is somehow tainted. This is not a defense to a civil suit.

2. ATNO better be worried because the suit could result in receivership meaning that an independent auditor would take over the company and see what's really going on. Then it all gets turned over to the United States Attorney for prosecution. I believe receivership was demanded in the original complaint.

3. The judge is not going to throw it out because ATNO waived any legitimate defenses they had by not including them in their answer/motion to dismiss. All Perotti needs to do is allege a prima facie case of false press releases and the case will go to trial. There might have been defects in the Complaint, but they were waived by not raising a single affirmative defense in the pleadings.

4. The case won't be disposed of prior to trial because the company waived its right to seek summary judgment by filing a frivolous summary judgment motion that will be denied since they did not include evidence. To obtain summary judgment, they can't just file a motion, they must attach sworn affidavits, documents, etc., and they just sent in some rambling paper that nobody can even understand.

5. None of the prior lawsuits matter, I don't know why ATNO doesn't understand that. Just because someone won or lost a previous lawsuit does not affect a totally different lawsuit.

6. The company made a major blunder by not retaining legal counsel. Now when they hire a lawyer to try to clean their mess up, there will be no defenses left for them since they blew it. NO defenses in their answer. NO defenses in their motion to dismiss. NO defenses in their summary judgment motion. So what's left for them?

[QaB2i]

Maybe so.But, clearly you didn't go to law school. Judges don't throw complaints out. Nevada public companies don't get an auto pass because they claim they cannot afford an attorney. One hand we are led to believe that Atlantis is in the IPTV business. Every PR I've read says it loud and clear. Not one word of the IPTV business was ever committed to an SEC filing ___ I'll say that again___NOT ONE WORD OF IPTV BUSINESS WAS EVER IN AN SEC FILING.

So, what shareholders where told in implicit detail was the story of a start-up,nationwide IPTV business,that was buying and reselling IPTV boxes to an audience of Zero. The box allegedly by the Company's own admission and web sites enables subscribers access to brand name databases of movies such as Blockbusters and Netflix. Never mind that the pure idea that either of these previously mentioned wonderful companies would consider doing business with W S & Doo-buy or ATNO.Nevertheless,this was the claim that ATNO made to fool naive speculators into buying stock. Doo-buy went as far as to make Youtube adverts featuring a box and a TV with a wireless keyboard and mouse and recorded an interview with an on line investment newsletter to further promote the imaginary business. All the while sending PR's and promotion into this forum and others besides.





So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish

[QaB2i]

.





So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish

[PIZZABUSTER1]

COULD BE A TEXICAN STANDOFF,,