News Focus
News Focus
icon url

paheka

04/09/08 4:40 PM

#215178 RE: mschere #215174

mschere..so i guess i'm an 'imbecile' but in my life i've seen a few courts and asst Batbrains..LOL..lighten up?Do you REALLY think that my referring to the Honorable Judge Deborah Batt's as "batbrain" help's the shorts??

When a judge rules from the bench without even taking time to review prior law and being observed as confused about the case...i'd venture she had no professional right to make such a decision!!Loop,Ghors,Whiz have all commented as to her "incredulous" decision.. Sorry,IMO she is either batty, a batbrain or perhaps bought!

We HOPE she will be remanded!!





icon url

olddog967

04/09/08 4:48 PM

#215182 RE: mschere #215174

mschere: I agree with you that it is inappropriate to characterize Judge Batts as "Batbrain" or other similar names, just because the person does not agree with the Judge's decision. In the same vein, I also think it is inappropriate for you to characterize individuals who you do not agree with as:

"Neophytes, Naysayers, Whiners, non-stock holding irrelevant Pests, Option losers, FUDMEISTERS, Genius Decision Makers, Option players, CLUELESS, etc"




IMO:Only an Imbecile or a Short would characterise a Federal Judge as "Batbrain"..especially when that Judge's written ORDER for Preliminary Injunction and Order Compelling Arbitration is being Appealed..