Replies to post #215182 on InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[mschere]

IMO:In some instances, I believe I was being Thoughtfully conservative in my characterizations..and never used obscenity.


mschere: I agree with you that it is inappropriate to characterize Judge Batts as "Batbrain" or other similar names, just because the person does not agree with the Judge's decision. In the same vein, I also think it is inappropriate for you to characterize individuals who you do not agree with as:

"Neophytes, Naysayers, Whiners, non-stock holding irrelevant Pests, Option losers, FUDMEISTERS, Genius Decision Makers, Option players, CLUELESS, etc"

[Desert dweller]

olddog, you don't understand, anything he does is ok but he is free to condemn anyone and everyone else who does not agree with him and hang on to every word of his.

Message In Reply To:
mschere: I agree with you that it is inappropriate to characterize Judge Batts as "Batbrain" or other similar names, just because the person does not agree with the Judge's decision. In the same vein, I also think it is inappropriate for you to characterize individuals who you do not agree with as:

"Neophytes, Naysayers, Whiners, non-stock holding irrelevant Pests, Option losers, FUDMEISTERS, Genius Decision Makers, Option players, CLUELESS, etc"




IMO:Only an Imbecile or a Short would characterise a Federal Judge as "Batbrain"..especially when that Judge's written ORDER for Preliminary Injunction and Order Compelling Arbitration is being Appealed..

[ciciagt]

Wow, excellent post, olddog.

Thanks for your thoughts.