Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,824.66
(
0.62%
)
US TECH 100
24,378.40
(
0.56%
)
Dow Jones
48,185.80
(
0.58%
)
Brent Oil
94.18
(
-0.29%
)
Bitcoin
72,361.76
(
0.80%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 435779
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

olddog967

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 81
Posts 12240
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/28/2003

olddog967

Member Level

Re: mschere post# 215174

Wednesday, 04/09/2008 4:48:19 PM

Wednesday, April 09, 2008 4:48:19 PM

Post# of 435779
mschere: I agree with you that it is inappropriate to characterize Judge Batts as "Batbrain" or other similar names, just because the person does not agree with the Judge's decision. In the same vein, I also think it is inappropriate for you to characterize individuals who you do not agree with as:

"Neophytes, Naysayers, Whiners, non-stock holding irrelevant Pests, Option losers, FUDMEISTERS, Genius Decision Makers, Option players, CLUELESS, etc"




IMO:Only an Imbecile or a Short would characterise a Federal Judge as "Batbrain"..especially when that Judge's written ORDER for Preliminary Injunction and Order Compelling Arbitration is being Appealed..
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent IDCC News
More IDCC News