Replies to post #93580 on World Surveillance Group Inc (fka WSGI)

[SAMdashada]

"You are speculating on something

you know nothing about."

serious1, that is exactly what you and others are doing when you claim the value of GTEM's(Wells Notice) unfulfilled "Overly Promotional PRs".

My proof is that we were promised that the Stratellite would Fly at Altitude in January 2005. That is less than 2 months shy of 3 years of FAILURE TO DELIVER on the part of GTEM(Wells Notice).

A PIPE DREAM that fails 10 to 20 times is still a PIPE DREAM and the chances that it will succeed diminish with each failure/lie/deceit/deception perpetuated on shareholders and the public. Not saying that someone else will not, at some point, accomplish something similar. But, as I said, GTEM's(Wells Notice) chances appear to have disappeared.

BUT, look on the bright side. GTEM(Wells Notice) has proven to be head and shoulders, YEARS AND YEARS, above the competition when it comes to generating/producing

quantities of legal actions against them.

See, that is YOUR shareholder money producing for YOU.

serious1, "You are speculating on something that you not only don't know anything about -- you are speculating on something that

DOES NOT CURRENTLY EXIST"!!!!!

[Jetmek_03052]

Serious1,

"Yes an Overhaul may be needed after evaluating if there are items that must go on like something the military wants and the ship must be reconfigured to meet the payload or the technology!"

Where EXACTLY are you getting the criteria for this statement?

Are you experienced in any aeronautical fields?

[eqbeck]

15 trading days(Dec 5th)and 2 hours left...

http://www.deepcapturethemovie.com/

takes 45 mins...gets intersting at slide 33 and wild at slide 50

but it's all a conspiracy right
smother the pneumonia sufferers since they might all die anyway...

your choice on who to believe, right

Interesting

[ColeThornton]

serious1 since you say...

"Yes an Overhaul may be needed after evaluating if there are items that must go on like something the military wants and the ship must be reconfigured to meet the payload or the technology!"

Could you please tell us why the military would want a "technology demonstrator" that doesn't work?

Doesn't the military, since lives depend on it, usually use proven finished equipment, that actually works, and not early prototype, "demonstrators", that don't work?

"And as far as a failed project proof it!"

serious1, the project I was referring to, was the one that had finished, commercial strats being sold by the end of this year. I mentioned this in the post. Do you really think it is necessary to wait until Jan. 1 to point this out?

And serious1, the "overall" Strat project, is much closer to "DEATH" than where the company told us it would be...

but you knew that.