InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Terrorballs

10/10/07 6:25 PM

#30144 RE: Shinoki #30140

So if Pawson was dumping shares into the O/S for such a long time, then the legal O/S can't possibly be the 41 million that was recently reported. Unless there's a way to dump shares without them going into the O/S, but I can't see how that would be possible.

Only one of two things would make sense:

1. The A/S was increased, but Pawson did not dump any shares. Instead, naked shorts decided to jump in seeing the increased A/S as an opportunity. This seems extremely unlikely IMO.

2. The O/S is actually much higher than reported. But the filing is real and if it were possible to make false filings about the O/S then I would assume that every pink would do it.

Thoughts?

Also is 41 million the O/S or the float? I thought O/S was common + preferred (correct me if I'm wrong), but the 41 million is "Common Stock outstanding" according to the September 18th 8k filing.

icon url

keymaster

10/10/07 8:10 PM

#30159 RE: Shinoki #30140

Shinoki, that is a pretty good summary. It's good to see someone has been reading up on past news and posts. If roger loses his company that is some consolation; if he ends up doing several years in jail while litigants slowly drain all his hidden assets, that will be fantastic! I would certainly be available to testify against him in any court proceedings. If I visited him in jail, do think I would get flagged for "taunting?"
icon url

stocksablaze

10/10/07 8:47 PM

#30165 RE: Shinoki #30140

well this is awesome, i didn't know that! is this true? who called? if true i imagine we will see a filing to decrease A/S, no?

"If your referring to the 9/24 increase to 6bil, some posters called in and found out that it was Pawson that did it. The TA didn't except the increase, so we are told."