Replies to post #47645 on Raadr Inc (RDAR)

[Let's See The Profits]

Your argument falls apart the moment someone opens the filings. Let’s start with this “performance bonus” claim. The documents clearly outline that the $1.05 million in performance bonuses are tied to specific deliverables and results, not backroom handouts. These weren’t swept in the month after the takeover. They're embedded in the Reg A and are contingent on hitting agreed-upon milestones. In fact, they’re recorded as liabilities, not payouts, and are fully disclosed under related-party transactions and accruals. That’s called transparent accounting, not a scam. You’re pushing the idea that executives wrote themselves checks and walked off. That’s not what happened. Then there’s the preferred dividend hysteria. There are no issued preferred shares yet. The Series B structure hasn’t been activated, only proposed. There’s no dividend being paid, planned, or possible unless preferred shares are issued and the board authorizes the dividend. The claim that this is a drain on company cash is just false. There is no mechanism yet for cash to leave to preferred holders, and when there is, it’ll be because profits or retained earnings allow it. Full stop.

And the legacy debt narrative? It’s already dead. Raadr's last 10-K shows that the vast majority of old toxic notes and payables were retired, extinguished, or forgiven, and recognized as a gain on the books. Some notes were written off due to statute limitations, and others settled with small share conversions already baked into the float. The new team didn’t inherit the mess, they cleaned it up. That’s why the balance sheet looks completely different post-acquisition. Finally, yes, Mexedia’s 2023 performance is real. €323.9 million in revenue, €13.8 million EBITDA, and €4.47 million in net profit. They built something. You can argue margins or efficiency, but not reality. That’s audited and published on multiple EU exchanges. These are real numbers, from a real business, with real clients.

You’re dressing up old data as if it's today’s truth. But the filings don’t support your version. Not about bonuses, not about cash burn, and not about debt. We’re past the restructuring phase. The platform is active, profitable, and scalable, and the filings prove it.

Your posts are easily dismantled.

[Let's See The Profits]

Yes, I actually do think a preferred dividend is good news, if it’s structured properly, it can be a very powerful move. Depending on how it's issued, shareholders could receive either cash payouts or additional preferred shares, both of which carry real value. There’s also the possibility that common shareholders are granted access or conversion rights, or are included through a future record date tied to holding duration or volume. The details and timeline would come from the company, but the significance here is the intent: Telvantis signaling that it wants to reward its shareholder base. That matters. A preferred dividend isn’t just about short-term reward, it can complicate or outright damage anyone betting against the stock. Shorts and toxic debt holders thrive on weak capital structures and passive boards. A preferred dividend, especially if it's tied to future performance or used as a wedge against convertible overhang, becomes a strategic weapon. It changes the game. This isn't the kind of move a company makes when it's desperate. This is what you do when you’re preparing to level up and make it expensive to bet against you.