CETH is currently trading at over $46 per share. I just picked one out of the list you supplied.
“Judicial precedent provides possible principles, rules, or standards to govern judicial decisions in future cases with arguably similar facts. Although the Court routinely purports to rely upon precedent, it is difficult to say with much precision how often precedent has actually constrained the Court’s decisions because the Justices plainly have latitude in how broadly or narrowly they chose to construe their prior decisions.”
This was from Judicial precedent interpretation.
Further it talks about Judges and over reliance on precedent can be problematic for a number of reasons. Ie a case that was similar wrongfully decided.
So basically, DBMM has a chance. Especially in our current environment.
Why did the case go to court if their are no excuses for late filings? Why did an experience law judge dismiss the case?
So the SEC take delinquent filers quite seriously does it? Because while DBMM was punished thousands of other OTC tickers traded just fine with years of delinquent filings. Actually most of the OTC tickers I traded in 2019-2021 were delinquent filers for many years.
As for you statement that if naked shorting was allowed to exist it would destroy the market, no that is not the case. Now if those counterfeit positions were forced to be closed out on a wide scale than that definitely could crash the market. Naked shorting is very prevalent and google is your friend, plenty of cases and plenty of fines payed out over the years.
In case anyone wants to understand the basic principle of those who naked short these OTC stocks. Their goal is for the company to disappear, so that they never have to cover and avoid taxes. This is about as criminal as it gets in the financial sphere and it has been going on for decades.
Shareholders are aware that if revocation was REQUIRED it would be a law and there would be no due process. If that is what the Commission intended, the regulation allowing judicial discretion would be canceled and the regulation would be automatic.
The Commission does not state revocation in any manner or form.
FYI— Agencies overreach is being reviewed by SCOTUS in this term with the SEC a prime example, in news today and I will share in separate post. Stay tuned.
Enforcement has gotten away with bullying and closing companies down as it is a number used as a “win” for funding each year.
Less than 1% of companies revoked ever are reregistered as the same Company.
This whole practice IMO should be revisited with companies being supported to survive in the best interests of shareholders, instead of quick wins by an over-reaching division of an agency, NOT directed by the Commission .
Have a read re agencies could have power lessened by SCOTUS. SEC? Good idea to pull back on Enforcement power, who overreach regularly.
Hello Renee... thank you for your very detailed post concerning DBMM. However, I see that there was nothing said about Judge Foelak's determination in this matter with her dismissal of the proceeding.
In every A.L.J. Final Decision the A.L.J. revoked a company's stock registration(s) by citing "An issuer’s failure to file periodic reports violates “a central provision of the Exchange Act , depriving both existing and prospective holders of its registered stock of the ability to make informed investment decisions based on current and reliable information." The A.L.J.'s also cite maintaining inviolate integrity of the Markets by revoking the registrations of companies that "egregiously failed" to file requisite Financials.*** A.L.J. Foelak rendered 100's of those FINAL Decisions!!! BUT NOT THIS ONE. Why did she have a change of heart in the DBMM matter. Could it be that she saw something quite different regarding the delinquent filings. And as she stated in her response, she did not see any reason to revoke DBMM. Can you explain why she came to a different conclusion with this case, especially as you stated she rendered 100's of final decisions to revoke....but not DBMM. Again why do you thing she did that?
...depriving both existing and prospective holders of its registered stock of the ability to make informed investment decisions based on current and reliable information."
Though the seriousness of this phrase is understood, I can honestly say that in all my years of playing OTC companies, I have yet to meet someone who actually used company filings as a basis to 'invest' in OTC stocks.
And considering probably 90% of companies that pass through the OTC are either scams or shells with no real business, having this and other such language to describe such 'businesses' is almost laughable.
But then its curious that while revocation is the standard penalty in these cases its also the 'norm' that 99.9% of said companies have no reason for not filing, are practically defunct, and just roll over and accept the penalty.
Yes, so After 5 years of deprivation of the existing shareholders ability to make their own educated decisions in terms of this investment due to the dramatic change of events in relation to the demonstration of current rock solid reporting and filing for a long period of time to repent and show it is no longer a public concern, you think this is the proper way for the SEC to conduct their business. If that is the case, then lets treat this like Pete Rose and never let the PED users a chance for the Hall of Fame and equally never give Fernando Tatis JR another chance to play Baseball again. There are literally an infinite amount of examples to show just how one sided this travesty is. Its so screwed up that some can trade the stock while others cannot. That is not protecting U.S. shareholders at all. Great Conspiracy being conducted, AIMVHO. $$$DBMM
You haven't proven anything and in fact you have proven why DBMM could win. Which of the stocks below fought back and YES if they were naked shorted it'd just be perfect so what gives? And no, there wouldn't be chaos in the markets. Litigation goes on for many companies and even paypal etc. are being sued for different matters now and has it disrupted anything? The sec. has overreached.
To all DBMM shareholders who can't/won't grasp the necessity for the SEC to maintain their precedent of revocation of registration(s) for all SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing MANDATORY Financials:
Over the last 12+ years that I have posted each revocation the SEC Admin. Law Judges have universally supported the SEC Division of Enforcement's Admin. Proceedings to revoke the registrations of 2,308 SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing Financials. The one "rare as chicken teeth" exception was A.L.J. Foelak who rendered an Initial Decision to essentially give DBMM a second chance. The SEC Division of Enforcement vigorously disagrees with A.L.J. Foelak's Initial Decision and argues that their precedent of accepting no excuses for Financials delinquencies must be maintained and that revocation of registration(s) must also be maintained. If the D.O.E. lose their precedents there would be havoc in the markets when other delinquent filers would use DBMM as the new precedent to not file Financials and get away with it.
In every A.L.J. Final Decision the A.L.J. revoked a company's stock registration(s) by citing "An issuer’s failure to file periodic reports violates “a central provision of the Exchange Act , depriving both existing and prospective holders of its registered stock of the ability to make informed investment decisions based on current and reliable information." The A.L.J.'s also cite maintaining inviolate integrity of the Markets by revoking the registrations of companies that "egregiously failed" to file requisite Financials. *** A.L.J. Foelak rendered 100's of those FINAL Decisions!!!
For any DBMM shareholder who is seriously interested in understanding the magnitude of the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM pick any sampling of stocks and go to the respective I-HUB boards to read the A.L.J. FINAL DECISION. Learn WHY those companies had their registration(s) revoked.
***** Readers may also discover posts about NSS on a few hundred of the listed stocks where there never was a short squeeze because there never was any NSS.....the BIGGEST LIE ON THE ENTIRE OTC!!!!! The entire stock markets would collapse if pervasive NSS existed as so many DBMM'ers pound the table about. Does anyone really think NSS criminals would confine themselves to just DBMM or a handful of stocks? If NSS was so easy to create they would do it to EVERY stock....Google, Microsoft, Bank stocks, etc. Incomprehensible insanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Over the last 12+ years I have spent 1,000's of hours compiling data to educate I-Hubbers. Surely the DBMM investors who ignore or reject the reasons for the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM can spend one measly hour to research a sampling of the stocks listed below.
To all DBMM shareholders who can't/won't grasp the necessity for the SEC to maintain their precedent of revocation of registration(s) for all SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing MANDATORY Financials:
Over the last 12+ years that I have posted each revocation the SEC Admin. Law Judges have universally supported the SEC Division of Enforcement's Admin. Proceedings to revoke the registrations of 2,308 SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing Financials. The one "rare as chicken teeth" exception was A.L.J. Foelak who rendered an Initial Decision to essentially give DBMM a second chance. The SEC Division of Enforcement vigorously disagrees with A.L.J. Foelak's Initial Decision and argues that their precedent of accepting no excuses for Financials delinquencies must be maintained and that revocation of registration(s) must also be maintained. If the D.O.E. lose their precedents there would be havoc in the markets when other delinquent filers would use DBMM as the new precedent to not file Financials and get away with it.
In every A.L.J. Final Decision the A.L.J. revoked a company's stock registration(s) by citing "An issuer’s failure to file periodic reports violates “a central provision of the Exchange Act , depriving both existing and prospective holders of its registered stock of the ability to make informed investment decisions based on current and reliable information." The A.L.J.'s also cite maintaining inviolate integrity of the Markets by revoking the registrations of companies that "egregiously failed" to file requisite Financials. *** A.L.J. Foelak rendered 100's of those FINAL Decisions!!!
For any DBMM shareholder who is seriously interested in understanding the magnitude of the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM pick any sampling of stocks and go to the respective I-HUB boards to read the A.L.J. FINAL DECISION. Learn WHY those companies had their registration(s) revoked.
***** Readers may also discover posts about NSS on a few hundred of the listed stocks where there never was a short squeeze because there never was any NSS.....the BIGGEST LIE ON THE ENTIRE OTC!!!!! The entire stock markets would collapse if pervasive NSS existed as so many DBMM'ers pound the table about. Does anyone really think NSS criminals would confine themselves to just DBMM or a handful of stocks? If NSS was so easy to create they would do it to EVERY stock....Google, Microsoft, Bank stocks, etc. Incomprehensible insanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Over the last 12+ years I have spent 1,000's of hours compiling data to educate I-Hubbers. Surely the DBMM investors who ignore or reject the reasons for the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM can spend one measly hour to research a sampling of the stocks listed below.
Is this Why I should Sale My Shares? Lol Is this Still Relevant?
To all DBMM shareholders who can't/won't grasp the necessity for the SEC to maintain their precedent of revocation of registration(s) for all SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing MANDATORY Financials:
Over the last 12+ years that I have posted each revocation the SEC Admin. Law Judges have universally supported the SEC Division of Enforcement's Admin. Proceedings to revoke the registrations of 2,308 SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing Financials. The one "rare as chicken teeth" exception was A.L.J. Foelak who rendered an Initial Decision to essentially give DBMM a second chance. The SEC Division of Enforcement vigorously disagrees with A.L.J. Foelak's Initial Decision and argues that their precedent of accepting no excuses for Financials delinquencies must be maintained and that revocation of registration(s) must also be maintained. If the D.O.E. lose their precedents there would be havoc in the markets when other delinquent filers would use DBMM as the new precedent to not file Financials and get away with it.
In every A.L.J. Final Decision the A.L.J. revoked a company's stock registration(s) by citing "An issuer’s failure to file periodic reports violates “a central provision of the Exchange Act , depriving both existing and prospective holders of its registered stock of the ability to make informed investment decisions based on current and reliable information." The A.L.J.'s also cite maintaining inviolate integrity of the Markets by revoking the registrations of companies that "egregiously failed" to file requisite Financials. *** A.L.J. Foelak rendered 100's of those FINAL Decisions!!!
For any DBMM shareholder who is seriously interested in understanding the magnitude of the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM pick any sampling of stocks and go to the respective I-HUB boards to read the A.L.J. FINAL DECISION. Learn WHY those companies had their registration(s) revoked.
***** Readers may also discover posts about NSS on a few hundred of the listed stocks where there never was a short squeeze because there never was any NSS.....the BIGGEST LIE ON THE ENTIRE OTC!!!!! The entire stock markets would collapse if pervasive NSS existed as so many DBMM'ers pound the table about. Does anyone really think NSS criminals would confine themselves to just DBMM or a handful of stocks? If NSS was so easy to create they would do it to EVERY stock....Google, Microsoft, Bank stocks, etc. Incomprehensible insanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Over the last 12+ years I have spent 1,000's of hours compiling data to educate I-Hubbers. Surely the DBMM investors who ignore or reject the reasons for the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM can spend one measly hour to research a sampling of the stocks listed below.
1) ihub rules do not allow attribution of the posts that are that old. Duh! This is why there is a search function if anyone wants to do actual DD! I highly recommend that all current shareholders read through all historical posts to understand management's history and what they are trying to erase! 2) The opinions and content are very material to today as they show management's history of misleading and utterly destroying believers investments! Oh, but this time is different... NO IT ISN'T! 3) The posts show that management has attempted to blame their poor performance on internet critics for over a decade! 4) Just as it is important to read and check the resume of someone before hiring them... it is important to check the resume of management of a company before investing dollars. Let's just say I wouldn't want to be looking for a job with that resume!
1) ihub rules do not allow attribution of the posts that are that old. Duh! This is why there is a search function if anyone wants to do actual DD! I highly recommend that all current shareholders read through all historical posts to understand management's history and what they are trying to erase! 2) The opinions and content are very material to today as they show management's history of misleading and utterly destroying believers investments! Oh, but this time is different... NO IT ISN'T! 3) The posts show that management has attempted to blame their poor performance on internet critics for over a decade! 4) Just as it is important to read and check the resume of someone before hiring them... it is important to check the resume of management of a company before investing dollars. Let's just say I wouldn't want to be looking for a job with that resume!
To all DBMM shareholders who can't/won't grasp the necessity for the SEC to maintain their precedent of revocation of registration(s) for all SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing MANDATORY Financials:
Over the last 12+ years that I have posted each revocation the SEC Admin. Law Judges have universally supported the SEC Division of Enforcement's Admin. Proceedings to revoke the registrations of 2,308 SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing Financials. The one "rare as chicken teeth" exception was A.L.J. Foelak who rendered an Initial Decision to essentially give DBMM a second chance. The SEC Division of Enforcement vigorously disagrees with A.L.J. Foelak's Initial Decision and argues that their precedent of accepting no excuses for Financials delinquencies must be maintained and that revocation of registration(s) must also be maintained. If the D.O.E. lose their precedents there would be havoc in the markets when other delinquent filers would use DBMM as the new precedent to not file Financials and get away with it.
In every A.L.J. Final Decision the A.L.J. revoked a company's stock registration(s) by citing "An issuer’s failure to file periodic reports violates “a central provision of the Exchange Act , depriving both existing and prospective holders of its registered stock of the ability to make informed investment decisions based on current and reliable information." The A.L.J.'s also cite maintaining inviolate integrity of the Markets by revoking the registrations of companies that "egregiously failed" to file requisite Financials. *** A.L.J. Foelak rendered 100's of those FINAL Decisions!!!
For any DBMM shareholder who is seriously interested in understanding the magnitude of the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM pick any sampling of stocks and go to the respective I-HUB boards to read the A.L.J. FINAL DECISION. Learn WHY those companies had their registration(s) revoked.
***** Readers may also discover posts about NSS on a few hundred of the listed stocks where there never was a short squeeze because there never was any NSS.....the BIGGEST LIE ON THE ENTIRE OTC!!!!! The entire stock markets would collapse if pervasive NSS existed as so many DBMM'ers pound the table about. Does anyone really think NSS criminals would confine themselves to just DBMM or a handful of stocks? If NSS was so easy to create they would do it to EVERY stock....Google, Microsoft, Bank stocks, etc. Incomprehensible insanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Over the last 12+ years I have spent 1,000's of hours compiling data to educate I-Hubbers. Surely the DBMM investors who ignore or reject the reasons for the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM can spend one measly hour to research a sampling of the stocks listed below.
To all DBMM shareholders who can't/won't grasp the necessity for the SEC to maintain their precedent of revocation of registration(s) for all SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing MANDATORY Financials:
Over the last 12+ years that I have posted each revocation the SEC Admin. Law Judges have universally supported the SEC Division of Enforcement's Admin. Proceedings to revoke the registrations of 2,308 SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing Financials. The one "rare as chicken teeth" exception was A.L.J. Foelak who rendered an Initial Decision to essentially give DBMM a second chance. The SEC Division of Enforcement vigorously disagrees with A.L.J. Foelak's Initial Decision and argues that their precedent of accepting no excuses for Financials delinquencies must be maintained and that revocation of registration(s) must also be maintained. If the D.O.E. lose their precedents there would be havoc in the markets when other delinquent filers would use DBMM as the new precedent to not file Financials and get away with it.
In every A.L.J. Final Decision the A.L.J. revoked a company's stock registration(s) by citing "An issuer’s failure to file periodic reports violates “a central provision of the Exchange Act , depriving both existing and prospective holders of its registered stock of the ability to make informed investment decisions based on current and reliable information." The A.L.J.'s also cite maintaining inviolate integrity of the Markets by revoking the registrations of companies that "egregiously failed" to file requisite Financials. *** A.L.J. Foelak rendered 100's of those FINAL Decisions!!!
For any DBMM shareholder who is seriously interested in understanding the magnitude of the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM pick any sampling of stocks and go to the respective I-HUB boards to read the A.L.J. FINAL DECISION. Learn WHY those companies had their registration(s) revoked.
***** Readers may also discover posts about NSS on a few hundred of the listed stocks where there never was a short squeeze because there never was any NSS.....the BIGGEST LIE ON THE ENTIRE OTC!!!!! The entire stock markets would collapse if pervasive NSS existed as so many DBMM'ers pound the table about. Does anyone really think NSS criminals would confine themselves to just DBMM or a handful of stocks? If NSS was so easy to create they would do it to EVERY stock....Google, Microsoft, Bank stocks, etc. Incomprehensible insanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Over the last 12+ years I have spent 1,000's of hours compiling data to educate I-Hubbers. Surely the DBMM investors who ignore or reject the reasons for the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM can spend one measly hour to research a sampling of the stocks listed below.
“To all DBMM shareholders who can't/won't grasp the necessity for the SEC to maintain their precedent of revocation of registration(s) for all SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing MANDATORY Financials:
Over the last 12+ years that I have posted each revocation the SEC Admin. Law Judges have universally supported the SEC Division of Enforcement's Admin. Proceedings to revoke the registrations of 2,308 SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing Financials. The one "rare as chicken teeth" exception was A.L.J. Foelak who rendered an Initial Decision to essentially give DBMM a second chance. The SEC Division of Enforcement vigorously disagrees with A.L.J. Foelak's Initial Decision and argues that their precedent of accepting no excuses for Financials delinquencies must be maintained and that revocation of registration(s) must also be maintained. If the D.O.E. lose their precedents there would be havoc in the markets when other delinquent filers would use DBMM as the new precedent to not file Financials and get away with it.
In every A.L.J. Final Decision the A.L.J. revoked a company's stock registration(s) by citing "An issuer’s failure to file periodic reports violates “a central provision of the Exchange Act , depriving both existing and prospective holders of its registered stock of the ability to make informed investment decisions based on current and reliable information." The A.L.J.'s also cite maintaining inviolate integrity of the Markets by revoking the registrations of companies that "egregiously failed" to file requisite Financials. *** A.L.J. Foelak rendered 100's of those FINAL Decisions!!!
For any DBMM shareholder who is seriously interested in understanding the magnitude of the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM pick any sampling of stocks and go to the respective I-HUB boards to read the A.L.J. FINAL DECISION. Learn WHY those companies had their registration(s) revoked.
***** Readers may also discover posts about NSS on a few hundred of the listed stocks where there never was a short squeeze because there never was any NSS.....the BIGGEST LIE ON THE ENTIRE OTC!!!!! The entire stock markets would collapse if pervasive NSS existed as so many DBMM'ers pound the table about. Does anyone really think NSS criminals would confine themselves to just DBMM or a handful of stocks? If NSS was so easy to create they would do it to EVERY stock....Google, Microsoft, Bank stocks, etc. Incomprehensible insanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Over the last 12+ years I have spent 1,000's of hours compiling data to educate I-Hubbers. Surely the DBMM investors who ignore or reject the reasons for the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM can spend one measly hour to research a sampling of the stocks listed below.
“To all DBMM shareholders who can't/won't grasp the necessity for the SEC to maintain their precedent of revocation of registration(s) for all SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing MANDATORY Financials:
Over the last 12+ years that I have posted each revocation the SEC Admin. Law Judges have universally supported the SEC Division of Enforcement's Admin. Proceedings to revoke the registrations of 2,308 SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing Financials. The one "rare as chicken teeth" exception was A.L.J. Foelak who rendered an Initial Decision to essentially give DBMM a second chance. The SEC Division of Enforcement vigorously disagrees with A.L.J. Foelak's Initial Decision and argues that their precedent of accepting no excuses for Financials delinquencies must be maintained and that revocation of registration(s) must also be maintained. If the D.O.E. lose their precedents there would be havoc in the markets when other delinquent filers would use DBMM as the new precedent to not file Financials and get away with it.
In every A.L.J. Final Decision the A.L.J. revoked a company's stock registration(s) by citing "An issuer’s failure to file periodic reports violates “a central provision of the Exchange Act , depriving both existing and prospective holders of its registered stock of the ability to make informed investment decisions based on current and reliable information." The A.L.J.'s also cite maintaining inviolate integrity of the Markets by revoking the registrations of companies that "egregiously failed" to file requisite Financials. *** A.L.J. Foelak rendered 100's of those FINAL Decisions!!!
For any DBMM shareholder who is seriously interested in understanding the magnitude of the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM pick any sampling of stocks and go to the respective I-HUB boards to read the A.L.J. FINAL DECISION. Learn WHY those companies had their registration(s) revoked.
***** Readers may also discover posts about NSS on a few hundred of the listed stocks where there never was a short squeeze because there never was any NSS.....the BIGGEST LIE ON THE ENTIRE OTC!!!!! The entire stock markets would collapse if pervasive NSS existed as so many DBMM'ers pound the table about. Does anyone really think NSS criminals would confine themselves to just DBMM or a handful of stocks? If NSS was so easy to create they would do it to EVERY stock....Google, Microsoft, Bank stocks, etc. Incomprehensible insanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Over the last 12+ years I have spent 1,000's of hours compiling data to educate I-Hubbers. Surely the DBMM investors who ignore or reject the reasons for the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM can spend one measly hour to research a sampling of the stocks listed below.
To all DBMM shareholders who can't/won't grasp the necessity for the SEC to maintain their precedent of revocation of registration(s) for all SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing MANDATORY Financials:
Over the last 12+ years that I have posted each revocation the SEC Admin. Law Judges have universally supported the SEC Division of Enforcement's Admin. Proceedings to revoke the registrations of 2,308 SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing Financials. The one "rare as chicken teeth" exception was A.L.J. Foelak who rendered an Initial Decision to essentially give DBMM a second chance. The SEC Division of Enforcement vigorously disagrees with A.L.J. Foelak's Initial Decision and argues that their precedent of accepting no excuses for Financials delinquencies must be maintained and that revocation of registration(s) must also be maintained. If the D.O.E. lose their precedents there would be havoc in the markets when other delinquent filers would use DBMM as the new precedent to not file Financials and get away with it.
In every A.L.J. Final Decision the A.L.J. revoked a company's stock registration(s) by citing "An issuer’s failure to file periodic reports violates “a central provision of the Exchange Act , depriving both existing and prospective holders of its registered stock of the ability to make informed investment decisions based on current and reliable information." The A.L.J.'s also cite maintaining inviolate integrity of the Markets by revoking the registrations of companies that "egregiously failed" to file requisite Financials. *** A.L.J. Foelak rendered 100's of those FINAL Decisions!!!
For any DBMM shareholder who is seriously interested in understanding the magnitude of the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM pick any sampling of stocks and go to the respective I-HUB boards to read the A.L.J. FINAL DECISION. Learn WHY those companies had their registration(s) revoked.
***** Readers may also discover posts about NSS on a few hundred of the listed stocks where there never was a short squeeze because there never was any NSS.....the BIGGEST LIE ON THE ENTIRE OTC!!!!! The entire stock markets would collapse if pervasive NSS existed as so many DBMM'ers pound the table about. Does anyone really think NSS criminals would confine themselves to just DBMM or a handful of stocks? If NSS was so easy to create they would do it to EVERY stock....Google, Microsoft, Bank stocks, etc. Incomprehensible insanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Over the last 12+ years I have spent 1,000's of hours compiling data to educate I-Hubbers. Surely the DBMM investors who ignore or reject the reasons for the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM can spend one measly hour to research a sampling of the stocks listed below.
To all DBMM shareholders who can't/won't grasp the necessity for the SEC to maintain their precedent of revocation of registration(s) for all SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing MANDATORY Financials:
Over the last 12+ years that I have posted each revocation the SEC Admin. Law Judges have universally supported the SEC Division of Enforcement's Admin. Proceedings to revoke the registrations of 2,308 SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing Financials. The one "rare as chicken teeth" exception was A.L.J. Foelak who rendered an Initial Decision to essentially give DBMM a second chance. The SEC Division of Enforcement vigorously disagrees with A.L.J. Foelak's Initial Decision and argues that their precedent of accepting no excuses for Financials delinquencies must be maintained and that revocation of registration(s) must also be maintained. If the D.O.E. lose their precedents there would be havoc in the markets when other delinquent filers would use DBMM as the new precedent to not file Financials and get away with it.
In every A.L.J. Final Decision the A.L.J. revoked a company's stock registration(s) by citing "An issuer’s failure to file periodic reports violates “a central provision of the Exchange Act , depriving both existing and prospective holders of its registered stock of the ability to make informed investment decisions based on current and reliable information." The A.L.J.'s also cite maintaining inviolate integrity of the Markets by revoking the registrations of companies that "egregiously failed" to file requisite Financials. *** A.L.J. Foelak rendered 100's of those FINAL Decisions!!!
For any DBMM shareholder who is seriously interested in understanding the magnitude of the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM pick any sampling of stocks and go to the respective I-HUB boards to read the A.L.J. FINAL DECISION. Learn WHY those companies had their registration(s) revoked.
***** Readers may also discover posts about NSS on a few hundred of the listed stocks where there never was a short squeeze because there never was any NSS.....the BIGGEST LIE ON THE ENTIRE OTC!!!!! The entire stock markets would collapse if pervasive NSS existed as so many DBMM'ers pound the table about. Does anyone really think NSS criminals would confine themselves to just DBMM or a handful of stocks? If NSS was so easy to create they would do it to EVERY stock....Google, Microsoft, Bank stocks, etc. Incomprehensible insanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Over the last 12+ years I have spent 1,000's of hours compiling data to educate I-Hubbers. Surely the DBMM investors who ignore or reject the reasons for the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM can spend one measly hour to research a sampling of the stocks listed below.
To all DBMM shareholders who can't/won't grasp the necessity for the SEC to maintain their precedent of revocation of registration(s) for all SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing MANDATORY Financials:
Over the last 12+ years that I have posted each revocation the SEC Admin. Law Judges have universally supported the SEC Division of Enforcement's Admin. Proceedings to revoke the registrations of 2,308 SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing Financials. The one "rare as chicken teeth" exception was A.L.J. Foelak who rendered an Initial Decision to essentially give DBMM a second chance. The SEC Division of Enforcement vigorously disagrees with A.L.J. Foelak's Initial Decision and argues that their precedent of accepting no excuses for Financials delinquencies must be maintained and that revocation of registration(s) must also be maintained. If the D.O.E. lose their precedents there would be havoc in the markets when other delinquent filers would use DBMM as the new precedent to not file Financials and get away with it.
In every A.L.J. Final Decision the A.L.J. revoked a company's stock registration(s) by citing "An issuer’s failure to file periodic reports violates “a central provision of the Exchange Act , depriving both existing and prospective holders of its registered stock of the ability to make informed investment decisions based on current and reliable information." The A.L.J.'s also cite maintaining inviolate integrity of the Markets by revoking the registrations of companies that "egregiously failed" to file requisite Financials. *** A.L.J. Foelak rendered 100's of those FINAL Decisions!!!
For any DBMM shareholder who is seriously interested in understanding the magnitude of the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM pick any sampling of stocks and go to the respective I-HUB boards to read the A.L.J. FINAL DECISION. Learn WHY those companies had their registration(s) revoked.
***** Readers may also discover posts about NSS on a few hundred of the listed stocks where there never was a short squeeze because there never was any NSS.....the BIGGEST LIE ON THE ENTIRE OTC!!!!! The entire stock markets would collapse if pervasive NSS existed as so many DBMM'ers pound the table about. Does anyone really think NSS criminals would confine themselves to just DBMM or a handful of stocks? If NSS was so easy to create they would do it to EVERY stock....Google, Microsoft, Bank stocks, etc. Incomprehensible insanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Over the last 12+ years I have spent 1,000's of hours compiling data to educate I-Hubbers. Surely the DBMM investors who ignore or reject the reasons for the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM can spend one measly hour to research a sampling of the stocks listed below.
To all DBMM shareholders who can't/won't grasp the necessity for the SEC to maintain their precedent of revocation of registration(s) for all SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing MANDATORY Financials:
Over the last 12+ years that I have posted each revocation the SEC Admin. Law Judges have universally supported the SEC Division of Enforcement's Admin. Proceedings to revoke the registrations of 2,308 SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing Financials. The one "rare as chicken teeth" exception was A.L.J. Foelak who rendered an Initial Decision to essentially give DBMM a second chance. The SEC Division of Enforcement vigorously disagrees with A.L.J. Foelak's Initial Decision and argues that their precedent of accepting no excuses for Financials delinquencies must be maintained and that revocation of registration(s) must also be maintained. If the D.O.E. lose their precedents there would be havoc in the markets when other delinquent filers would use DBMM as the new precedent to not file Financials and get away with it.
In every A.L.J. Final Decision the A.L.J. revoked a company's stock registration(s) by citing "An issuer’s failure to file periodic reports violates “a central provision of the Exchange Act , depriving both existing and prospective holders of its registered stock of the ability to make informed investment decisions based on current and reliable information." The A.L.J.'s also cite maintaining inviolate integrity of the Markets by revoking the registrations of companies that "egregiously failed" to file requisite Financials. *** A.L.J. Foelak rendered 100's of those FINAL Decisions!!!
For any DBMM shareholder who is seriously interested in understanding the magnitude of the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM pick any sampling of stocks and go to the respective I-HUB boards to read the A.L.J. FINAL DECISION. Learn WHY those companies had their registration(s) revoked.
***** Readers may also discover posts about NSS on a few hundred of the listed stocks where there never was a short squeeze because there never was any NSS.....the BIGGEST LIE ON THE ENTIRE OTC!!!!! The entire stock markets would collapse if pervasive NSS existed as so many DBMM'ers pound the table about. Does anyone really think NSS criminals would confine themselves to just DBMM or a handful of stocks? If NSS was so easy to create they would do it to EVERY stock....Google, Microsoft, Bank stocks, etc. Incomprehensible insanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Over the last 12+ years I have spent 1,000's of hours compiling data to educate I-Hubbers. Surely the DBMM investors who ignore or reject the reasons for the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM can spend one measly hour to research a sampling of the stocks listed below.
"NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / October 7, 2021 / VNUE, Inc. (OTC PINK:"VNUE") announced today thatthe Company has commenced a lawsuit against Power Up Lending Group, Ltd. and its CEO, Kurt Cramer, in the United States Federal District Court for the Eastern District of New York, in order to challenge and rescind several convertible note transactions that the company believes were unlawfully made and performed by Power Up as part of an alleged and potentially illegal convertible note business stemming over several years."
To all DBMM shareholders who can't/won't grasp the necessity for the SEC to maintain their precedent of revocation of registration(s) for all SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing MANDATORY Financials:
Over the last 12+ years that I have posted each revocation the SEC Admin. Law Judges have universally supported the SEC Division of Enforcement's Admin. Proceedings to revoke the registrations of 2,308 SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing Financials. The one "rare as chicken teeth" exception was A.L.J. Foelak who rendered an Initial Decision to essentially give DBMM a second chance. The SEC Division of Enforcement vigorously disagrees with A.L.J. Foelak's Initial Decision and argues that their precedent of accepting no excuses for Financials delinquencies must be maintained and that revocation of registration(s) must also be maintained. If the D.O.E. lose their precedents there would be havoc in the markets when other delinquent filers would use DBMM as the new precedent to not file Financials and get away with it.
In every A.L.J. Final Decision the A.L.J. revoked a company's stock registration(s) by citing "An issuer’s failure to file periodic reports violates “a central provision of the Exchange Act , depriving both existing and prospective holders of its registered stock of the ability to make informed investment decisions based on current and reliable information." The A.L.J.'s also cite maintaining inviolate integrity of the Markets by revoking the registrations of companies that "egregiously failed" to file requisite Financials. *** A.L.J. Foelak rendered 100's of those FINAL Decisions!!!
For any DBMM shareholder who is seriously interested in understanding the magnitude of the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM pick any sampling of stocks and go to the respective I-HUB boards to read the A.L.J. FINAL DECISION. Learn WHY those companies had their registration(s) revoked.
***** Readers may also discover posts about NSS on a few hundred of the listed stocks where there never was a short squeeze because there never was any NSS.....the BIGGEST LIE ON THE ENTIRE OTC!!!!! The entire stock markets would collapse if pervasive NSS existed as so many DBMM'ers pound the table about. Does anyone really think NSS criminals would confine themselves to just DBMM or a handful of stocks? If NSS was so easy to create they would do it to EVERY stock....Google, Microsoft, Bank stocks, etc. Incomprehensible insanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Over the last 12+ years I have spent 1,000's of hours compiling data to educate I-Hubbers. Surely the DBMM investors who ignore or reject the reasons for the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM can spend one measly hour to research a sampling of the stocks listed below.
My Very Abbreviated Explanation:Wrong. The Weatherman is at least right half the time. Meanwhile,$DBMM Busy Making History
NSS is the BIGGEST LIE in the OTC!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The short volumes posted by FINRA are actually shares traded that have not yet been settled between buyers and sellers as reported daily by Brokers. The daily number is adjusted to subtract share trades that have been settled between buyers and sellers and new share trades added that have not yet been settled. It is a constantly revolving number for all stocks. With the technological advancements by Brokers most trades are settled simultaneous to the trade execution or very soon thereafter......but multiple trades by a few buyers and sellers (eg., penny stock flippers) may not be settled by end of the day.If DBMM did not have any appreciable trading volume for 3 days the FINRA Short Volumes would be zero by the third day as all trades would be settled by then.Everyone knows that Brokers have up to a 3 day settlement period.For FINRA to have approved the FORM 211 for DBMM they would have ensured there were no Fail To Deliver (FTD) shares outstanding or any inaccuracies to DBMM's Outstanding Shares.There are 2 safeguards to prevent Fail To Deliver shares, also known as Naked Short Shares....Regulation Sho and the Depository Trust Corp. Offenders that contravene Regulation Sho are prosecuted when the abuses are discovered.Regulation Sho, (a.k.a. Reg Sho):My very abbreviated explanation:When online trading began about 20-ish years ago trading volumes exploded into the mega billions per day. It was virtually impossible for Brokers or their electronic trading vehicles to settle every trade when there would be multiple buyers of one seller's shares or multiple sellers for one buyer's shares, millions of times per day. Brokers had up to 5 days to settle all trades or the unsettled trades would be Fail to Deliver shares......infamously called Naked Short Shar es/ NSS.Reg Sho is an elaborate Securities Law implemented by the SEC at the timelines of online trading to force all Brokers to settle all trades within 5 days (at that time), to prevent unsettled trades/Fail To Delive rs/NSS beyond 5 days. To repeat, offenders are caught and prosecuted !!!!!!!!!!!!D epository Trust Corp/DTC or DTCC: ***NOTE: OTC Markets displays shares held at the DTCThe DTCC have absolute power and authority to ensure all public companies on the OTC abide by SEC rules governing confirmed Outstanding Shares. Offending companies or Convertible Debenture Lenders that unlawfully increase the Outstanding Shares by not abiding Rule 144, etc., will be sanctioned by the DTCC, either with a Global Lock that prevents all trading, or a Continuous Net Settlement Order that requires all trades by buyers and sellers to be confirmed BEFORE the trade can be executed. DBMM's Outstanding Shares are confirmed by the DTCC to be exactly 787,718,631......NOT BILLIONS like the NSS'ers pound the table about.FINRA would have checked that there were no issues with Regulation Sho or with the Depository Trust Corp. BEFORE granting the FORM 211 to Glendale Securities.
Out of 2,308. $DBMM Prevailed! What's the Revocation Timeline? Asking for a Friend that doesn't hold shares but is on the Fence, & Leaning more towards the negative.
NSS is the BIGGEST LIE in the OTC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Weatherman is at least right half the time. Meanwhile,$DBMM Busy Making History
NSS is the BIGGEST LIE in the OTC!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The short volumes posted by FINRA are actually shares traded that have not yet been settled between buyers and sellers as reported daily by Brokers. The daily number is adjusted to subtract share trades that have been settled between buyers and sellers and new share trades added that have not yet been settled. It is a constantly revolving number for all stocks. With the technological advancements by Brokers most trades are settled simultaneous to the trade execution or very soon thereafter......but multiple trades by a few buyers and sellers (eg., penny stock flippers) may not be settled by end of the day.If DBMM did not have any appreciable trading volume for 3 days the FINRA Short Volumes would be zero by the third day as all trades would be settled by then.Everyone knows that Brokers have up to a 3 day settlement period.For FINRA to have approved the FORM 211 for DBMM they would have ensured there were no Fail To Deliver (FTD) shares outstanding or any inaccuracies to DBMM's Outstanding Shares.There are 2 safeguards to prevent Fail To Deliver shares, also known as Naked Short Shares....Regulation Sho and the Depository Trust Corp. Offenders that contravene Regulation Sho are prosecuted when the abuses are discovered.Regulation Sho, (a.k.a. Reg Sho):My very abbreviated explanation:When online trading began about 20-ish years ago trading volumes exploded into the mega billions per day. It was virtually impossible for Brokers or their electronic trading vehicles to settle every trade when there would be multiple buyers of one seller's shares or multiple sellers for one buyer's shares, millions of times per day. Brokers had up to 5 days to settle all trades or the unsettled trades would be Fail to Deliver shares......infamously called Naked Short Shar es/ NSS.Reg Sho is an elaborate Securities Law implemented by the SEC at the timelines of online trading to force all Brokers to settle all trades within 5 days (at that time), to prevent unsettled trades/Fail To Delive rs/NSS beyond 5 days. To repeat, offenders are caught and prosecuted !!!!!!!!!!!!D epository Trust Corp/DTC or DTCC: ***NOTE: OTC Markets displays shares held at the DTCThe DTCC have absolute power and authority to ensure all public companies on the OTC abide by SEC rules governing confirmed Outstanding Shares. Offending companies or Convertible Debenture Lenders that unlawfully increase the Outstanding Shares by not abiding Rule 144, etc., will be sanctioned by the DTCC, either with a Global Lock that prevents all trading, or a Continuous Net Settlement Order that requires all trades by buyers and sellers to be confirmed BEFORE the trade can be executed. DBMM's Outstanding Shares are confirmed by the DTCC to be exactly 787,718,631......NOT BILLIONS like the NSS'ers pound the table about.FINRA would have checked that there were no issues with Regulation Sho or with the Depository Trust Corp. BEFORE granting the FORM 211 to Glendale Securities.
Angry Shareholders?You mean Shorts?Asking for a friend.
The Weatherman is at least right half the time. Meanwhile,$DBMM Busy Making History
NSS is the BIGGEST LIE in the OTC!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The short volumes posted by FINRA are actually shares traded that have not yet been settled between buyers and sellers as reported daily by Brokers. The daily number is adjusted to subtract share trades that have been settled between buyers and sellers and new share trades added that have not yet been settled. It is a constantly revolving number for all stocks. With the technological advancements by Brokers most trades are settled simultaneous to the trade execution or very soon thereafter......but multiple trades by a few buyers and sellers (eg., penny stock flippers) may not be settled by end of the day.If DBMM did not have any appreciable trading volume for 3 days the FINRA Short Volumes would be zero by the third day as all trades would be settled by then.Everyone knows that Brokers have up to a 3 day settlement period.For FINRA to have approved the FORM 211 for DBMM they would have ensured there were no Fail To Deliver (FTD) shares outstanding or any inaccuracies to DBMM's Outstanding Shares.There are 2 safeguards to prevent Fail To Deliver shares, also known as Naked Short Shares....Regulation Sho and the Depository Trust Corp. Offenders that contravene Regulation Sho are prosecuted when the abuses are discovered.Regulation Sho, (a.k.a. Reg Sho):My very abbreviated explanation:When online trading began about 20-ish years ago trading volumes exploded into the mega billions per day. It was virtually impossible for Brokers or their electronic trading vehicles to settle every trade when there would be multiple buyers of one seller's shares or multiple sellers for one buyer's shares, millions of times per day. Brokers had up to 5 days to settle all trades or the unsettled trades would be Fail to Deliver shares......infamously called Naked Short Shar es/ NSS.Reg Sho is an elaborate Securities Law implemented by the SEC at the timelines of online trading to force all Brokers to settle all trades within 5 days (at that time), to prevent unsettled trades/Fail To Delive rs/NSS beyond 5 days. To repeat, offenders are caught and prosecuted !!!!!!!!!!!!D epository Trust Corp/DTC or DTCC: ***NOTE: OTC Markets displays shares held at the DTCThe DTCC have absolute power and authority to ensure all public companies on the OTC abide by SEC rules governing confirmed Outstanding Shares. Offending companies or Convertible Debenture Lenders that unlawfully increase the Outstanding Shares by not abiding Rule 144, etc., will be sanctioned by the DTCC, either with a Global Lock that prevents all trading, or a Continuous Net Settlement Order that requires all trades by buyers and sellers to be confirmed BEFORE the trade can be executed. DBMM's Outstanding Shares are confirmed by the DTCC to be exactly 787,718,631......NOT BILLIONS like the NSS'ers pound the table about.FINRA would have checked that there were no issues with Regulation Sho or with the Depository Trust Corp. BEFORE granting the FORM 211 to Glendale Securities.
To all DBMM shareholders who can't/won't grasp the necessity for the SEC to maintain their precedent of revocation of registration(s) for all SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing MANDATORY Financials:
Over the last 12+ years that I have posted each revocation the SEC Admin. Law Judges have universally supported the SEC Division of Enforcement's Admin. Proceedings to revoke the registrations of 2,308 SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing Financials. The one "rare as chicken teeth" exception was A.L.J. Foelak who rendered an Initial Decision to essentially give DBMM a second chance. The SEC Division of Enforcement vigorously disagrees with A.L.J. Foelak's Initial Decision and argues that their precedent of accepting no excuses for Financials delinquencies must be maintained and that revocation of registration(s) must also be maintained. If the D.O.E. lose their precedents there would be havoc in the markets when other delinquent filers would use DBMM as the new precedent to not file Financials and get away with it.
In every A.L.J. Final Decision the A.L.J. revoked a company's stock registration(s) by citing "An issuer’s failure to file periodic reports violates “a central provision of the Exchange Act , depriving both existing and prospective holders of its registered stock of the ability to make informed investment decisions based on current and reliable information." The A.L.J.'s also cite maintaining inviolate integrity of the Markets by revoking the registrations of companies that "egregiously failed" to file requisite Financials. *** A.L.J. Foelak rendered 100's of those FINAL Decisions!!!
For any DBMM shareholder who is seriously interested in understanding the magnitude of the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM pick any sampling of stocks and go to the respective I-HUB boards to read the A.L.J. FINAL DECISION. Learn WHY those companies had their registration(s) revoked.
***** Readers may also discover posts about NSS on a few hundred of the listed stocks where there never was a short squeeze because there never was any NSS.....the BIGGEST LIE ON THE ENTIRE OTC!!!!! The entire stock markets would collapse if pervasive NSS existed as so many DBMM'ers pound the table about. Does anyone really think NSS criminals would confine themselves to just DBMM or a handful of stocks? If NSS was so easy to create they would do it to EVERY stock....Google, Microsoft, Bank stocks, etc. Incomprehensible insanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Over the last 12+ years I have spent 1,000's of hours compiling data to educate I-Hubbers. Surely the DBMM investors who ignore or reject the reasons for the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM can spend one measly hour to research a sampling of the stocks listed below.
Was there Mitigating Circumstances for $DBMM? ALJ Says: YES How is saying the Opposite of an ALJ beneficial to Shareholders? Asking for a Friend. Is there a Revocation Timeline?
There are no "mitigating circumstances" for 2 years of delinquent Financials with NOT ONE WORD from the company during the delinquencies. See any 8K's during that timeframe????????? See any shareholder updates during that timeframe???????????
It isn't fair for me to now give odds on DBMM winning or losing on the PFR, but I have always been on the shareholders' side, even when it appears that I'm not.
The COVID pandemic excuse and the other extremely feeble excuses from DBMM insult the intelligence of an amoeba because the company could have spent a few measly minutes to file N/T late notifications or 8K's or at least shareholder updates that they have no problem submitting now. And THAT is why the D.O.E. is so adamant about DBMM being penalized for the delinquencies......not their compliance AFTER they got caught.
is $GNS related to$DBMM like 2,308 Revoked SEC Registrations? Asking for a Friend
. To all DBMM shareholders who can't/won't grasp the necessity for the SEC to maintain their precedent of revocation of registration(s) for all SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing MANDATORY Financials:
Over the last 12+ years that I have posted each revocation the SEC Admin. Law Judges have universally supported the SEC Division of Enforcement's Admin. Proceedings to revoke the registrations of 2,308 SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing Financials. The one "rare as chicken teeth" exception was A.L.J. Foelak who rendered an Initial Decision to essentially give DBMM a second chance. The SEC Division of Enforcement vigorously disagrees with A.L.J. Foelak's Initial Decision and argues that their precedent of accepting no excuses for Financials delinquencies must be maintained and that revocation of registration(s) must also be maintained. If the D.O.E. lose their precedents there would be havoc in the markets when other delinquent filers would use DBMM as the new precedent to not file Financials and get away with it.
In every A.L.J. Final Decision the A.L.J. revoked a company's stock registration(s) by citing "An issuer’s failure to file periodic reports violates “a central provision of the Exchange Act , depriving both existing and prospective holders of its registered stock of the ability to make informed investment decisions based on current and reliable information." The A.L.J.'s also cite maintaining inviolate integrity of the Markets by revoking the registrations of companies that "egregiously failed" to file requisite Financials. *** A.L.J. Foelak rendered 100's of those FINAL Decisions!!!
For any DBMM shareholder who is seriously interested in understanding the magnitude of the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM pick any sampling of stocks and go to the respective I-HUB boards to read the A.L.J. FINAL DECISION. Learn WHY those companies had their registration(s) revoked.
***** Readers may also discover posts about NSS on a few hundred of the listed stocks where there never was a short squeeze because there never was any NSS.....the BIGGEST LIE ON THE ENTIRE OTC!!!!! The entire stock markets would collapse if pervasive NSS existed as so many DBMM'ers pound the table about. Does anyone really think NSS criminals would confine themselves to just DBMM or a handful of stocks? If NSS was so easy to create they would do it to EVERY stock....Google, Microsoft, Bank stocks, etc. Incomprehensible insanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Over the last 12+ years I have spent 1,000's of hours compiling data to educate I-Hubbers. Surely the DBMM investors who ignore or reject the reasons for the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM can spend one measly hour to research a sampling of the stocks listed below.
Kramer|$GNS|$GTII related to$DBMM like 2,308 Revoked SEC Registrations? Asking for a Friend
Not one little bit of that shows even 1 NSS here in DBMM. It doesn’t show Kramer having anything to do with DBMM either. Posts stating Kramer has anything to do with DBMM are completely off topic. So what is gonna on here. Is the SP doing that slow bleed back down to chitville? Hmm I wonder where I saw someone say that would happen LOL!! All the NSS and Kramer talk is just nonsense to try and get the newbies to buy some of those heavy bags bought up around .03 LOL!! Let’s have a show of hands how many hear are now upside down and getting worse by the day with their SP? I bet most are just seeing red day after day on their DBMM shares
To all DBMM shareholders who can't/won't grasp the necessity for the SEC to maintain their precedent of revocation of registration(s) for all SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing MANDATORY Financials:
Over the last 12+ years that I have posted each revocation the SEC Admin. Law Judges have universally supported the SEC Division of Enforcement's Admin. Proceedings to revoke the registrations of 2,308 SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing Financials. The one "rare as chicken teeth" exception was A.L.J. Foelak who rendered an Initial Decision to essentially give DBMM a second chance. The SEC Division of Enforcement vigorously disagrees with A.L.J. Foelak's Initial Decision and argues that their precedent of accepting no excuses for Financials delinquencies must be maintained and that revocation of registration(s) must also be maintained. If the D.O.E. lose their precedents there would be havoc in the markets when other delinquent filers would use DBMM as the new precedent to not file Financials and get away with it.
In every A.L.J. Final Decision the A.L.J. revoked a company's stock registration(s) by citing "An issuer’s failure to file periodic reports violates “a central provision of the Exchange Act , depriving both existing and prospective holders of its registered stock of the ability to make informed investment decisions based on current and reliable information." The A.L.J.'s also cite maintaining inviolate integrity of the Markets by revoking the registrations of companies that "egregiously failed" to file requisite Financials. *** A.L.J. Foelak rendered 100's of those FINAL Decisions!!!
For any DBMM shareholder who is seriously interested in understanding the magnitude of the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM pick any sampling of stocks and go to the respective I-HUB boards to read the A.L.J. FINAL DECISION. Learn WHY those companies had their registration(s) revoked.
***** Readers may also discover posts about NSS on a few hundred of the listed stocks where there never was a short squeeze because there never was any NSS.....the BIGGEST LIE ON THE ENTIRE OTC!!!!! The entire stock markets would collapse if pervasive NSS existed as so many DBMM'ers pound the table about. Does anyone really think NSS criminals would confine themselves to just DBMM or a handful of stocks? If NSS was so easy to create they would do it to EVERY stock....Google, Microsoft, Bank stocks, etc. Incomprehensible insanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Over the last 12+ years I have spent 1,000's of hours compiling data to educate I-Hubbers. Surely the DBMM investors who ignore or reject the reasons for the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM can spend one measly hour to research a sampling of the stocks listed below.
Kramer|$GNS|$GTII relatedto $DBMM like 2,308 Revoked SEC Registrations? Asking for a Friend
Not one little bit of that shows even 1 NSS here in DBMM. It doesn’t show Kramer having anything to do with DBMM either. Posts stating Kramer has anything to do with DBMM are completely off topic. So what is gonna on here. Is the SP doing that slow bleed back down to chitville? Hmm I wonder where I saw someone say that would happen LOL!! All the NSS and Kramer talk is just nonsense to try and get the newbies to buy some of those heavy bags bought up around .03 LOL!! Let’s have a show of hands how many hear are now upside down and getting worse by the day with their SP? I bet most are just seeing red day after day on their DBMM shares
To all DBMM shareholders who can't/won't grasp the necessity for the SEC to maintain their precedent of revocation of registration(s) for all SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing MANDATORY Financials:
Over the last 12+ years that I have posted each revocation the SEC Admin. Law Judges have universally supported the SEC Division of Enforcement's Admin. Proceedings to revoke the registrations of 2,308 SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing Financials. The one "rare as chicken teeth" exception was A.L.J. Foelak who rendered an Initial Decision to essentially give DBMM a second chance. The SEC Division of Enforcement vigorously disagrees with A.L.J. Foelak's Initial Decision and argues that their precedent of accepting no excuses for Financials delinquencies must be maintained and that revocation of registration(s) must also be maintained. If the D.O.E. lose their precedents there would be havoc in the markets when other delinquent filers would use DBMM as the new precedent to not file Financials and get away with it.
In every A.L.J. Final Decision the A.L.J. revoked a company's stock registration(s) by citing "An issuer’s failure to file periodic reports violates “a central provision of the Exchange Act , depriving both existing and prospective holders of its registered stock of the ability to make informed investment decisions based on current and reliable information." The A.L.J.'s also cite maintaining inviolate integrity of the Markets by revoking the registrations of companies that "egregiously failed" to file requisite Financials. *** A.L.J. Foelak rendered 100's of those FINAL Decisions!!!
For any DBMM shareholder who is seriously interested in understanding the magnitude of the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM pick any sampling of stocks and go to the respective I-HUB boards to read the A.L.J. FINAL DECISION. Learn WHY those companies had their registration(s) revoked.
***** Readers may also discover posts about NSS on a few hundred of the listed stocks where there never was a short squeeze because there never was any NSS.....the BIGGEST LIE ON THE ENTIRE OTC!!!!! The entire stock markets would collapse if pervasive NSS existed as so many DBMM'ers pound the table about. Does anyone really think NSS criminals would confine themselves to just DBMM or a handful of stocks? If NSS was so easy to create they would do it to EVERY stock....Google, Microsoft, Bank stocks, etc. Incomprehensible insanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Over the last 12+ years I have spent 1,000's of hours compiling data to educate I-Hubbers. Surely the DBMM investors who ignore or reject the reasons for the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM can spend one measly hour to research a sampling of the stocks listed below.
Should shareholders Contact Linda & Maranda about this too? Asking for a Friend.
To all DBMM shareholders who can't/won't grasp the necessity for the SEC to maintain their precedent of revocation of registration(s) for all SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing MANDATORY Financials:
Over the last 12+ years that I have posted each revocation the SEC Admin. Law Judges have universally supported the SEC Division of Enforcement's Admin. Proceedings to revoke the registrations of 2,308 SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing Financials. The one "rare as chicken teeth" exception was A.L.J. Foelak who rendered an Initial Decision to essentially give DBMM a second chance. The SEC Division of Enforcement vigorously disagrees with A.L.J. Foelak's Initial Decision and argues that their precedent of accepting no excuses for Financials delinquencies must be maintained and that revocation of registration(s) must also be maintained. If the D.O.E. lose their precedents there would be havoc in the markets when other delinquent filers would use DBMM as the new precedent to not file Financials and get away with it.
In every A.L.J. Final Decision the A.L.J. revoked a company's stock registration(s) by citing "An issuer’s failure to file periodic reports violates “a central provision of the Exchange Act , depriving both existing and prospective holders of its registered stock of the ability to make informed investment decisions based on current and reliable information." The A.L.J.'s also cite maintaining inviolate integrity of the Markets by revoking the registrations of companies that "egregiously failed" to file requisite Financials. *** A.L.J. Foelak rendered 100's of those FINAL Decisions!!!
For any DBMM shareholder who is seriously interested in understanding the magnitude of the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM pick any sampling of stocks and go to the respective I-HUB boards to read the A.L.J. FINAL DECISION. Learn WHY those companies had their registration(s) revoked.
***** Readers may also discover posts about NSS on a few hundred of the listed stocks where there never was a short squeeze because there never was any NSS.....the BIGGEST LIE ON THE ENTIRE OTC!!!!! The entire stock markets would collapse if pervasive NSS existed as so many DBMM'ers pound the table about. Does anyone really think NSS criminals would confine themselves to just DBMM or a handful of stocks? If NSS was so easy to create they would do it to EVERY stock....Google, Microsoft, Bank stocks, etc. Incomprehensible insanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Over the last 12+ years I have spent 1,000's of hours compiling data to educate I-Hubbers. Surely the DBMM investors who ignore or reject the reasons for the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM can spend one measly hour to research a sampling of the stocks listed below.
Is there a possible large Short in $DBMM like $GTII? Asking for a Friend
***** Readers may also discover posts about NSS on a few hundred of the listed stocks where there never was a short squeeze because there never was any NSS.....the BIGGEST LIE ON THE ENTIRE OTC!!!!!
The entire stock markets would collapse if pervasive NSS existed as so many DBMM'ers pound the table about.
Does anyone really think NSS criminals would confine themselves to just DBMM or a handful of stocks?
If NSS was so easy to create they would do it to EVERY stock....Google, Microsoft, Bank stocks, etc. Incomprehensible insanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Over the last 12+ years I have spent 1,000's of hours compiling data to educate I-Hubbers.
Surely the DBMM investors who ignore or reject the reasons for the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM can spend one measly hour to research a sampling of the stocks listed below.
Should we still send posts to Maranda Fritz&Linda Perry? Asking for a Friend of Mine Best thing is silence|let the market sort it out.
DBMM'ers have my permission to copy my post and send it to Maranda Fritz and Linda Perry.
A DBMM advocacy post: If there is another 90 day extension tomorrow it is plausible to think there could be interminable 90 day extensions. No-one wins with the interminable 90 day extensions, not the SEC D.O.E., not A.L.J. Foelak, and most importantly, not Digital Brand Media.
So then, instead of the very unproductive back and forth bantering on whether the SEC D.O.E. is wrong or right, or Digital Brand Media is wrong or right, or A.L.J. Foelak was wrong or right, shareholders can individually or as a group contact Maranda Fritz and Linda Perry directly and suggest the following:
#1. Maranda Fritz as DBMM's Lawyer and Linda Perry could negotiate a deal with the SEC D.O.E. to accept revocation that protects the SEC D.O.E. demand for "precedents' (i.e. revocation), protects the judicial integrity of A.L.J. Foelak's Initial Decision, and provides a window for DBMM to quickly reregister with the SEC whereby the SEC commits to not holding up a FORM 10 to reregister with interminable questions. DBMM could be reregistered within 60 days, and DBMM could again ask a Market Maker to submit a FORM 211 to FINRA to obtain quotations. Optimal timeframe 90 days, the equivalent of one 90 day extension.....no more Caveat Emptor and no more 90 day extensions!! Everyone wins.
#2. Maranda Fritz and Linda Perry could cite a D.O.E. recommendation in their O.I.P. against Legacy Xchange Inc. that had their registration revoked on Nov. 30,2022. In the D.O.E.'s arguments they wrote "If, after revocation, Legacy is able to meet the relevant requirements, it may file a Form 10 to re-register its securities under Exchange Act Section 12(g)". This is the first time I have seen this inclusion in a D.O.E. argument for revocation, and Maranda Fritz and Linda Perry could negotiate a deal citing the D.O.E.'s own words.
I suggest not contaminating any contact with Maranda Fritz or Linda Perry with NSS conspiracies. Wouldn't they already know if there was an NSS issue with DBMM?
Ridiculous. The pumpers out post the naysayers by almost 3 to 1 which is what the 3rd party will tell Linda. The most nonsense posts are by the pumpers and are hurting the company by doing so.
Continual garbage like 'revocation guaranteed' just make and DD sound like stupidity. And the jibberish goes quiet when asked for proof, LOL. A friend of mine once told me 'pumpers cost investors more than bashers do'. Its too bad the ridiculousness doesnt stop.
Still waiting for those 1000s of investors who were going to buy 100s of millions of shares once the CE was dropped? Maybe they are in hiding instead of asher. Stop with the ridiculous accusations and veiled hints and we all will be fine.
I get the precedent argument. I made it in the beginning when the DOE recommendation was filed and subsequently challenged. What you have pointed out, in length, is correct to the point of prior cases. But, where it falls short, is the assumption the ALJ not agreeing with a DOE recommendation is rare or would affect ant SEC established rules. This process was setup as a check and balance in the system. These proceedings are not court proceedings, they are internal rule compliance governance based on the established rules within the SEC. Every company has a right to challenge them, just as DBMM has. Most do not because OTC is largely a scam wasteland. Some challenge SEC and some win. I am not just talking about revocation, as well. DOE has more purpose than revocation. In addition, this process to establish a moderator(ALJ) to review the DOE and any information the company may want to present, is designed to allow for a case by case review. As many cases could have extenuating circumstances that are not in anyway related to other companies. You can't have a zero tolerance policy and maintain a working system with equality throughout. This is why, if both the ALJ and DOE come to the same unfavorable conclusion, it can be challenged in a court of law. What makes this DBMM case stand out, is almost nobody fights revocation, not any assumed precedent.
Prepare4 MarketHav0c as$DBMM AccumulatesInfo4 Potential Action Against StockManipulation.
The Company has noted that recent prosecutions by the SEC and the DOJ of named individuals who deliberately manipulate and peddle misinformation, often slanderous are cause for regulatory and public policy concerns.
DBMM has long highlighted the negative aspects of those paid to create chaos and scare shareholders. The Company stated in recent Shareholder Updates, that it has sought advice from individuals and organizations prudent in these matters, and participation by third parties in monitoring and gathering information.
$DBMM c0ntacted 0TCW|Meets all 0TC0B lower platf0rm criteria. OTCW has NOT already responded that they will work with the Company Early in the New Year to effect the transition to the lower platform Source:http://www.dbmmgroup.com/shareholders-update-december-28-2022
$DBMM c0ntacted 0TCW|Meets all 0TC0B lower platform criteria. OTCW has NOT already responded that they will work with the Company Early in the New Year to effect the transition to the lower platform Source:http://www.dbmmgroup.com/shareholders-update-december-28-2022
Any such exemption is conditioned upon the bid price for such Company’s securities remaining over $0.01 for each of the Company’s next 30 calendar days on OTCQB. ($DBMM .01 50+ days hardlythecompany’saction +1)
oh.wow.OTCMGroup may consider an exemption if:a)The Company is applying for admission to OTCQB in conjunction with an initial review for quotation eligibility;
b)There has been no prior public market for the Company’s securities in the U.S. and FINRA has recently approved a Form 211 relating to the Company’s securities with a bid price equal or greater to $0.01; or
c)The Company’s securities are traded on a Qualified Foreign Exchange at a price equal to or greater than $0.01.
But wait - what is this? 100% LIE to MANIPULATE $DBMM PPS. To scare current investors to SELL. To scare potential investors. Here is the PROOF that below is 100% LIE to MANIPULATE $DBMM PPS> $DBMM SEC OIP Website CLEARLY SHOWS - there is NO FINAL DECISION for Judge Patil ORDER. https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/ap-3-17990.xml
✅Why cho0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestment0pp.$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
✅Why cho0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestment0pp.$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
✅Why cho0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestment0pp.$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
✅Why cho0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestment0pp.$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
✅Why cho0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestment0pp.$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
✅Why cho0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestmentopp.$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
Topics Related to $DBMM: Wes and company CEOs taking action against short sellers| $GNS, $CRTD, $GTII $FNGR $TRCH $MMAT $MMTLP $GME $AMC and $BBBY, a ClayTrader Video| $GTII | $HPIL | $VNUE | 2,308 Other Stocks | HUD | Kramer |Ex Morgan Stanley Employee |Avid Traders Interview with COO Reggie James|Ex-JPMorgan Gold Traders Ask for No Prison Time in Spoofing Case
✅Why cho0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestment0pp.$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
Meanwhile, Dec. 9, 2021 34-93747 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Mar. 9, 2022 34-94385 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Jun. 7, 2022 34-95056 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Sep. 6, 2022 34-95675 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Dec. 5, 2022 34-96446 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Mar. 6, 2023 34-97047 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Jun. 2, 2023 33-11198 Order Dismissing Proceedings
$DBMM litigated w/Asher for the protection of shareholders+marketplace.Asher Enterprises, Inc. has been sanctioned numerous times by the Commission for Securities §5 violations and, under information and belief, intends to commit further Securities Act §5 violations in DBMM's securities.
✅Why cho0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestmentopp.$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
✅Why cho0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestment0pp.$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
✅Why cho0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestment0pp.$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
IT IS ORDERED this administrative proceeding IS DISMISSED. by Administrative Law Judge(ALJ) Carol Fox Foelak
This Initial Decision shall become effective in accordance with and subject to the provisions of Rule 360 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. § 201.360. Pursuant to that Rule, a party may file a petition for review of this Initial Decision within twenty-one days after service of the Initial Decision. A party may also file a motion to correct a manifest error of fact within ten days of the Initial Decision, pursuant to Rule 111 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. § 201.111. If a motion to correct a manifest error of fact is filed by a party, then a party shall have twenty-one days to file a petition for review from the date of the undersigned’s order resolving such motion to correct a manifest error of fact. The Initial Decision will not become final until the Commission enters an order of finality. The Commission will enter an order of finality unless a party files a petition for review or a motion to correct a manifest error of fact or the Commission determines on its own initiative to review the Initial Decision as to a party. final as to that party. If any of these events occur, the Initial Decision shall not become ______________________________ Carol Fox Foelak Administrative Law Judge S o u r c e : https://www.sec.gov/alj/aljdec/2019/id1389cff.pdf
IT IS ORDERED this administrative proceeding IS DISMISSED. by Administrative Law Judge(ALJ) Carol Fox Foelak
This Initial Decision shall become effective in accordance with and subject to the provisions of Rule 360 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. § 201.360. Pursuant to that Rule, a party may file a petition for review of this Initial Decision within twenty-one days after service of the Initial Decision. A party may also file a motion to correct a manifest error of fact within ten days of the Initial Decision, pursuant to Rule 111 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. § 201.111. If a motion to correct a manifest error of fact is filed by a party, then a party shall have twenty-one days to file a petition for review from the date of the undersigned’s order resolving such motion to correct a manifest error of fact. The Initial Decision will not become final until the Commission enters an order of finality. The Commission will enter an order of finality unless a party files a petition for review or a motion to correct a manifest error of fact or the Commission determines on its own initiative to review the Initial Decision as to a party. final as to that party. If any of these events occur, the Initial Decision shall not become ______________________________ Carol Fox Foelak Administrative Law Judge S o u r c e : https://www.sec.gov/alj/aljdec/2019/id1389cff.pdf
Funders wait,to ensure $DBMM Isn't revoked by the Commission.
The Company has the present ability to move forward to continue to grow its business for the benefit of its shareholders and asks that the Commission affirm the decision of the Law Judge denying revocation of its registration.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, the Company submits that revocation of its registration is not necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors, and that the denial of revocation should be affirmed.
Dated: March 26, 2021 Respectfully Submitted, /s/Maranda Fritz_____________________ Maranda E. Fritz Maranda E. Fritz PC 335 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10017
✅Why cho0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestment0pp.$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
2023Commision:$DBMM proceeding Dismissed due to MitigatingExcuses🤷♀️
$DBMM! Digital Brand Media & Marketing Group, Inc. Intellicell Biosciences, Inc. 3-17990
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/opinions/2023/33-11198.pdf Minimum 4 Fraud Cases! "Not Kramer but a Fraud Asscociate" (Moot)! "IT was a Kazillion Years Ago" (Moot) "Evidence" (moot)! ALJ Carol Fox Foelak (moot)! CE drop (moot)! Timely Filings (moot) Are Late Filings also Moot? Asking for a Friend. Happy Belated Groundhogs Day! 02/02/23
✅Why cho0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestment0pp.$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
inCourt UnderOath DOE resorts to Slander $DBMM+Management. (DOH! Br. at 25-28)
$DBMM has obtained resources to complete the re-audit, bring the Company current, & continue its timely filings,
DOE once again rejects the Law Judge’s analysis and conclusion that the Company explained the reasons for the reporting violations and demonstrated that it had taken effective measures to ensure timely filing.
The Company undertook and successfully completed the re-audit, while also addressing and resolving the litigation. Having resolved those issues, the Company then ensured, for three years, the timely filing of its periodic reports. Its assurances are more than credible; they have been borne out by years of filings.
$DBMM Accumulating Info for Potential Action Against StockBashing⚖️
The Company has noted that recent prosecutions by the SEC and the DOJ of named individuals who deliberately manipulate and peddle misinformation, often slanderous are cause for regulatory and public policy concerns.
DBMM has long highlighted the negative aspects of those paid to create chaos and scare shareholders. The Company stated in recent Shareholder Updates, that it has sought advice from individuals and organizations prudent in these matters, and participation by third parties in monitoring and gathering information.
Commision:$DBMM proceedingDismissed due to MitigatingExcuses
$DBMM! Digital Brand Media & Marketing Group, Inc. Intellicell Biosciences, Inc. 3-17990
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/opinions/2023/33-11198.pdf Minimum 4 Fraud Cases! "Not Kramer but a Fraud Asscociate" (Moot)! "IT was a Kazillion Years Ago" (Moot) "Evidence" (moot)! ALJ Carol Fox Foelak (moot)! CE drop (moot)! Timely Filings (moot) Are Late Filings also Moot? Asking for a Friend. Happy Belated Groundhogs Day! 02/02/23
✅Why ch0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestment0pp.$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
ALJ:"No available sanction appropriate|Thus ProceedingDismissed. -------------------------------V. ORDER------------------------------ IT IS ORDERED this administrative proceeding IS DISMISSED." by Administrative Law Judge(ALJ) Carol Fox Foelak
Came off Grey + Pink Current (same thing) +2 211 filed + 211 accepted (same thing) +2
01 or higher for 50+ days (hardly the company's action) +1 (Requires a min. bid price for 30 days above .01 & a bid price above .01 on the day when approval would be made.)
Then the CE DROPPED +1 10 K in (although MOOT) + 1 08 K in (although MOOT) + 1
Timely Filings Moot = Sometimes Late Filings Moot = Sometimes Delays Moot = Sometimes 3+ Years Timely Great Stuff
✅Why ch0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestment0pp.$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
✅Why ch0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestment0pp.$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
✅Why ch0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestment0pp.$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
Funders wait,to ensure $DBMM Isn't revoked by the Commission.
The Company has the present ability to move forward to continue to grow its business for the benefit of its shareholders and asks that the Commission affirm the decision of the Law Judge denying revocation of its registration.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, the Company submits that revocation of its registration is not necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors, and that the denial of revocation should be affirmed.
Dated: March 26, 2021 Respectfully Submitted, /s/Maranda Fritz_____________________ Maranda E. Fritz Maranda E. Fritz PC 335 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10017
Meanwhile, Dec. 9, 2021 34-93747 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Mar. 9, 2022 34-94385 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Jun. 7, 2022 34-95056 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Sep. 6, 2022 34-95675 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Dec. 5, 2022 34-96446 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Mar. 6, 2023 34-97047 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Jun. 2, 2023 33-11198 Order Dismissing Proceedings
✅Why ch0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestment0pp.$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
✅Why ch0se $DBMM?Gr0und-floorInvestment0pp.$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
To all DBMM shareholders who can't/won't grasp the necessity for the SEC to maintain their precedent of revocation of registration(s) for all SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing MANDATORY Financials:
Over the last 12+ years that I have posted each revocation the SEC Admin. Law Judges have universally supported the SEC Division of Enforcement's Admin. Proceedings to revoke the registrations of 2,308 SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing Financials. The one "rare as chicken teeth" exception was A.L.J. Foelak who rendered an Initial Decision to essentially give DBMM a second chance. The SEC Division of Enforcement vigorously disagrees with A.L.J. Foelak's Initial Decision and argues that their precedent of accepting no excuses for Financials delinquencies must be maintained and that revocation of registration(s) must also be maintained. If the D.O.E. lose their precedents there would be havoc in the markets when other delinquent filers would use DBMM as the new precedent to not file Financials and get away with it.
In every A.L.J. Final Decision the A.L.J. revoked a company's stock registration(s) by citing "An issuer’s failure to file periodic reports violates “a central provision of the Exchange Act , depriving both existing and prospective holders of its registered stock of the ability to make informed investment decisions based on current and reliable information." The A.L.J.'s also cite maintaining inviolate integrity of the Markets by revoking the registrations of companies that "egregiously failed" to file requisite Financials. *** A.L.J. Foelak rendered 100's of those FINAL Decisions!!!
For any DBMM shareholder who is seriously interested in understanding the magnitude of the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM pick any sampling of stocks and go to the respective I-HUB boards to read the A.L.J. FINAL DECISION. Learn WHY those companies had their registration(s) revoked.
***** Readers may also discover posts about NSS on a few hundred of the listed stocks where there never was a short squeeze because there never was any NSS.....the BIGGEST LIE ON THE ENTIRE OTC!!!!! The entire stock markets would collapse if pervasive NSS existed as so many DBMM'ers pound the table about. Does anyone really think NSS criminals would confine themselves to just DBMM or a handful of stocks? If NSS was so easy to create they would do it to EVERY stock....Google, Microsoft, Bank stocks, etc. Incomprehensible insanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Over the last 12+ years I have spent 1,000's of hours compiling data to educate I-Hubbers. Surely the DBMM investors who ignore or reject the reasons for the D.O.E. arguments against DBMM can spend one measly hour to research a sampling of the stocks listed below.
No available sanction appropriate|Thus Proceeding Dismissed. -------------------------------V. ORDER------------------------------ IT IS ORDERED this administrative proceeding IS DISMISSED. by Administrative Law Judge(ALJ) Carol Fox Foelak
Came off Grey + Pink Current (same thing) +2 211 filed + 211 accepted (same thing) +2
01 or higher for 50 + days(hardly the company's action) +1 (Requires a min. bid price for 30 days above .01 & a bid price above .01 on the day when approval would be made.)
Then the CE DROPPED +1 10 K in (although MOOT) + 1 08 K in (although MOOT) + 1 Commission Dismissed Case (hardly the company’s action)+1
Timely Filings Moot = Sometimes Late Filings Moot = Sometimes Delays Moot = Sometimes 3+ Years Timely Great Stuff
Meanwhile, Dec. 9, 2021 34-93747 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Mar. 9, 2022 34-94385 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Jun. 7, 2022 34-95056 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Sep. 6, 2022 34-95675 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Dec. 5, 2022 34-96446 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Mar. 6, 2023 34-97047 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Jun. 2, 2023 33-11198 Order Dismissing Proceedings
✅Why cho0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestment0pp $GME|$AMCLevel $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
✅Why cho0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestment0pp $GME|$AMCLeveL $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
No available sanction appropriate|Thus Proceeding Dismissed. -------------------------------V. ORDER------------------------------ IT IS ORDERED this administrative proceeding IS DISMISSED. by Administrative Law Judge(ALJ) Carol Fox Foelak
Came off Grey + Pink Current (same thing) +2 211 filed + 211 accepted (same thing) +2
01 or higher for 50 + days(hardly the company's action) +1 (Requires a min. bid price for 30 days above .01 & a bid price above .01 on the day when approval would be made.)
Then the CE DROPPED +1 10 K in (although MOOT) + 1 08 K in (although MOOT) + 1 Commission Dismissed Case (hardly the company’s action)+1
Timely Filings Moot = Sometimes Late Filings Moot = Sometimes Delays Moot = Sometimes 3+ Years Timely Great Stuff
***** Readers may also discover posts about NSS on a few hundred of the listed stocks where there never was a short squeeze because there never was any NSS.....the BIGGEST LIE ON THE ENTIRE OTC!!!!! The entire stock markets would collapse if pervasive NSS existed as so many DBMM'ers pound the table about. Does anyone really think NSS criminals would confine themselves to just DBMM or a handful of stocks? If NSS was so easy to create they would do it to EVERY stock....Google, Microsoft, Bank stocks, etc. Incomprehensible insanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
✅Why cho0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestment0pp$GME|$AMCLevel $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
✅Why ch0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestment0pp$GME|$AMCLevel $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
✅Why ch0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestment0pp.$GME|$AMCLevel $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
Meanwhile, Dec. 9, 2021 34-93747 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Mar. 9, 2022 34-94385 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Jun. 7, 2022 34-95056 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Sep. 6, 2022 34-95675 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Dec. 5, 2022 34-96446 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Mar. 6, 2023 34-97047 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Jun. 2, 2023 33-11198 Order Dismissing Proceedings
✅Why ch0se $dbmm?Gr0und-floorInvestment0pp$GME|$AMCLevel $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
IT IS ORDERED this administrative proceeding IS DISMISSED. by Administrative Law Judge(ALJ) Carol Fox Foelak
This Initial Decision shall become effective in accordance with and subject to the provisions of Rule 360 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. § 201.360. Pursuant to that Rule, a party may file a petition for review of this Initial Decision within twenty-one days after service of the Initial Decision. A party may also file a motion to correct a manifest error of fact within ten days of the Initial Decision, pursuant to Rule 111 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. § 201.111. If a motion to correct a manifest error of fact is filed by a party, then a party shall have twenty-one days to file a petition for review from the date of the undersigned’s order resolving such motion to correct a manifest error of fact. The Initial Decision will not become final until the Commission enters an order of finality. The Commission will enter an order of finality unless a party files a petition for review or a motion to correct a manifest error of fact or the Commission determines on its own initiative to review the Initial Decision as to a party. final as to that party. If any of these events occur, the Initial Decision shall not become ______________________________ Carol Fox Foelak Administrative Law Judge S o u r c e : https://www.sec.gov/alj/aljdec/2019/id1389cff.pdf
Commision:$DBMM proceeding Dismissed due to MitigatingExcuses
$DBMM! Digital Brand Media & Marketing Group, Inc. Intellicell Biosciences, Inc. 3-17990
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/opinions/2023/33-11198.pdf Minimum 4 Fraud Cases! "Not Kramer but a Fraud Asscociate" (Moot)! "IT was a Kazillion Years Ago" (Moot) "Evidence" (moot)! ALJ Carol Fox Foelak (moot)! CE drop (moot)! Timely Filings (moot) Are Late Filings also Moot? Asking for a Friend. Happy Belated Groundhogs Day! 02/02/23
✅Why ch00se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestment0pp$GME|$AMCLevel $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
The Company has noted that recent prosecutions by the SEC and the DOJ of named individuals who deliberately manipulate and peddle misinformation, often slanderous are cause for regulatory and public policy concerns.
DBMM has long highlighted the negative aspects of those paid to create chaos and scare shareholders. The Company stated in recent Shareholder Updates, that it has sought advice from individuals and organizations prudent in these matters, and participation by third parties in monitoring and gathering information.
$DBMM! Digital Brand Media & Marketing Group, Inc. Intellicell Biosciences, Inc. 3-17990
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/opinions/2023/33-11198.pdf Minimum 4 Fraud Cases! "Not Kramer but a Fraud Asscociate" (Moot)! "IT was a Kazillion Years Ago" (Moot) "Evidence" (moot)! ALJ Carol Fox Foelak (moot)! CE drop (moot)! Timely Filings (moot) Are Late Filings also Moot? Asking for a Friend. Happy Belated Groundhogs Day! 02/02/23
Topics Related to $DBMM: Wes and company CEOs taking action against short sellers| $GNS, $CRTD, $GTII $FNGR $TRCH $MMAT $MMTLP $GME $AMC and $BBBY, a ClayTrader Video| $GTII | $HPIL | $VNUE | 2,308 Other Stocks | HUD | Kramer |Ex Morgan Stanley Employee |Avid Traders Interview with COO Reggie James|Ex-JPMorgan Gold Traders Ask for No Prison Time in Spoofing Case
✅Why cho0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestment0pp$GME|$AMCLevel $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
The Company has noted that recent prosecutions by the SEC and the DOJ of named individuals who deliberately manipulate and peddle misinformation, often slanderous are cause for regulatory and public policy concerns.
DBMM has long highlighted the negative aspects of those paid to create chaos and scare shareholders. The Company stated in recent Shareholder Updates, that it has sought advice from individuals and organizations prudent in these matters, and participation by third parties in monitoring and gathering information.
Meanwhile, Dec. 9, 2021 34-93747 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Mar. 9, 2022 34-94385 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Jun. 7, 2022 34-95056 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Sep. 6, 2022 34-95675 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Dec. 5, 2022 34-96446 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Mar. 6, 2023 34-97047 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Jun. 2, 2023 33-11198 Order Dismissing Proceedings
✅100%HAV0KS00N|Ground-floorInvestment0pp|$GME|$AMCLevel $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
No available sanction appropriate|Thus Proceeding Dismissed. -------------------------------V. ORDER------------------------------ IT IS ORDERED this administrative proceeding IS DISMISSED. by Administrative Law Judge(ALJ) Carol Fox Foelak
Came off Grey + Pink Current (same thing) +2 211 filed + 211 accepted (same thing) +2
01 or higher for 50 + days(hardly the company's action) +1 (Requires a min. bid price for 30 days above .01 & a bid price above .01 on the day when approval would be made.)
Then the CE DROPPED +1 10 K in (although MOOT) + 1 08 K in (although MOOT) + 1 Commission Dismissed Case (hardly the company’s action)+1
Timely Filings Moot = Sometimes Late Filings Moot = Sometimes Delays Moot = Sometimes 3+ Years Timely Great Stuff
✅WhyCho0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestment0pp$GME|$AMCLevel $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
No available sanction appropriate|Thus Proceeding Dismissed. -------------------------------V. ORDER------------------------------ IT IS ORDERED this administrative proceeding IS DISMISSED. by Administrative Law Judge(ALJ) Carol Fox Foelak
Came off Grey + Pink Current (same thing) +2 211 filed + 211 accepted (same thing) +2
01 or higher for 50 + days(hardly the company's action) +1 (Requires a min. bid price for 30 days above .01 & a bid price above .01 on the day when approval would be made.)
Then the CE DROPPED +1 10 K in (although MOOT) + 1 08 K in (although MOOT) + 1 Commission Dismissed Case (hardly the company’s action)+1
Timely Filings Moot = Sometimes Late Filings Moot = Sometimes Delays Moot = Sometimes 3+ Years Timely Great Stuff
6, 12, 2023 — SEC charged investment adviser Sabby Management LLC & managing partner,Hal D. Mintz,w/ fraud in connection w/ a long running scheme involving misrepresentations & violations of rules for short selling & order making, as well as other violative trading, that generated $2M + in illegal profits.
From at least March 2017-May 2019 Sabby|Mintz repeatedly circumvented trading rules to conduct unlawful trades in the stock of 10 PUBLIC COMPANIES! Sabby |Mintz engaged in illegal “naked short selling” by intentionally|improperly placing short sales when they knew or were reckless in not knowing that they had not borrowed or located the shares, & then failed to make timely delivery of the shares. The purpose was to earn profits they could not have gained by legal trading.
The naked short selling artificially deflated the price of securities, allowing them to obtain more shares cheaper price.
✅why Ch0se $DBMMgroundfloorInvestment0pp✅$GME|$AMCLevel $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
inCourt🔥Under0ath🔥D0EresortsToBashing $DBMM+Management (D0H! Br. at 25-28.)
$DBMM has obtained resources to complete the re-audit, bring the Company current, & continue its timely filings,
DOE once again rejects the Law Judge’s analysis and conclusion that the Company explained the reasons for the reporting violations and demonstrated that it had taken effective measures to ensure timely filing.
The Company undertook and successfully completed the re-audit, while also addressing and resolving the litigation. Having resolved those issues, the Company then ensured, for three years, the timely filing of its periodic reports. Its assurances are more than credible; they have been borne out by years of filings.
🔥WhyCh0se🔥$DBMM|Ground-fl00rInvesting0pp$GME|$AMC|Level🔥 $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
✅WhyCh0se✅$DBMM?Ground-fl0rInvesting0pp$GME|$AMCLevel $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
The Company has the present ability to move forward to continue to grow its business for the benefit of its shareholders and asks that the Commission affirm the decision of the Law Judge denying revocation of its registration.
C0NCLUSI0N
For the foregoing reasons, the Company submits that revocation of its registration is not necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors, and that the denial of revocation should be affirmed.
Dated: March 26, 2021 Respectfully Submitted, /s/Maranda Fritz_____________________ Maranda E. Fritz Maranda E. Fritz PC 335 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10017
✅WhyCh0se🔥 $DBMM?Ground-fl0rInvesting0pp$GME|$AMCLevel $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
✅WhyCh0se🔥$DBMM?Ground-fl0rInvestment0pp$GME|$AMCLevel $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
No available sanction appropriate|Thus Proceeding Dismissed. -------------------------------V. ORDER------------------------------ IT IS ORDERED this administrative proceeding IS DISMISSED. by Administrative Law Judge(ALJ) Carol Fox Foelak
Came off Grey + Pink Current (same thing) +2 211 filed + 211 accepted (same thing) +2
01 or higher for 50 + days(hardly the company's action) +1 (Requires a min. bid price for 30 days above .01 & a bid price above .01 on the day when approval would be made.)
Then the CE DROPPED +1 10 K in (although MOOT) + 1 08 K in (although MOOT) + 1 Commission Dismissed Case (hardly the company’s action)+1
Timely Filings Moot = Sometimes Late Filings Moot = Sometimes Delays Moot = Sometimes 3+ Years Timely Great Stuff
Topics Related to $DBMM: Wes and company CEOs taking action against short sellers| $GNS, $CRTD, $GTII $FNGR $TRCH $MMAT $MMTLP $GME $AMC and $BBBY, a ClayTrader Video| $GTII | $HPIL | $VNUE | 2,308 Other Stocks | HUD | Kramer |Ex Morgan Stanley Employee |Avid Traders Interview with COO Reggie James|Ex-JPMorgan Gold Traders Ask for No Prison Time in Spoofing Case
✅WhyCh0se🔥$DBMM?Ground-fl0rInvesting0pp$GME|$AMCLevel $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
6, 12, 2023 — SEC charged investment adviser Sabby Management LLC & managing partner,Hal D. Mintz,w/ fraud in connection w/ a long running scheme involving misrepresentations & violations of rules for short selling & order making, as well as other violative trading, that generated $2M + in illegal profits.
From at least March 2017-May 2019 Sabby|Mintz repeatedly circumvented trading rules to conduct unlawful trades in the stock of 10 PUBLIC COMPANIES! Sabby |Mintz engaged in illegal “naked short selling” by intentionally|improperly placing short sales when they knew or were reckless in not knowing that they had not borrowed or located the shares, & then failed to make timely delivery of the shares. The purpose was to earn profits they could not have gained by legal trading.
The naked short selling artificially deflated the price of securities, allowing them to obtain more shares cheaper price.
The Company has noted that recent prosecutions by the SEC and the DOJ of named individuals who deliberately manipulate and peddle misinformation, often slanderous are cause for regulatory and public policy concerns.
DBMM has long highlighted the negative aspects of those paid to create chaos and scare shareholders. The Company stated in recent Shareholder Updates, that it has sought advice from individuals and organizations prudent in these matters, and participation by third parties in monitoring and gathering information.
✅WhyCh0se$DBMM🔥ChickenTeethRare🔥$GME|$AMCLevel $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
✅WhyCh0se🔥$DBMM|Ground-fl0rInvesting0pp$GME|$AMC🔥Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
✅WhyCh0se🔥$DBMM🔥Ground-fl0rInvesting0pp$GME|$AMCLevel $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
Meanwhile, Dec. 9, 2021 34-93747 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Mar. 9, 2022 34-94385 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Jun. 7, 2022 34-95056 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Sep. 6, 2022 34-95675 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Dec. 5, 2022 34-96446 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Mar. 6, 2023 34-97047 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Jun. 2, 2023 33-11198 Order Dismissing Proceedings
✅WhyCh0se🔥$DBMMGround-fl0rInvestment0pp$GME|$AMC🔥Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
Meanwhile, Dec. 9, 2021 34-93747 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Mar. 9, 2022 34-94385 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Jun. 7, 2022 34-95056 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Sep. 6, 2022 34-95675 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Dec. 5, 2022 34-96446 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Mar. 6, 2023 34-97047 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Jun. 2, 2023 33-11198 Order Dismissing Proceedings
✅WhyCh0se🔥$DBMMGround-fl0rInvestment0pp$GME|$AMCLevel $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
✅WhyCh0se $DBMM🔥Ground-fl0rInvesting0pp$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
inCourt Under0ath🔥D0H! resorts toSlander$DBMM+Management🔥 (D0H! Br. at 25-28.)
$DBMM has obtained resources to complete the re-audit, bring the Company current, & continue its timely filings,
DOE once again rejects the Law Judge’s analysis and conclusion that the Company explained the reasons for the reporting violations and demonstrated that it had taken effective measures to ensure timely filing.
The Company undertook and successfully completed the re-audit, while also addressing and resolving the litigation. Having resolved those issues, the Company then ensured, for three years, the timely filing of its periodic reports. Its assurances are more than credible; they have been borne out by years of filings.
✅WhyCh0se$DBMM|Ground-fl0rInvesting0pp🔥$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
Topics Related to $DBMM: Wes and company CEOs taking action against short sellers| $GNS, $CRTD, $GTII $FNGR $TRCH $MMAT $MMTLP $GME $AMC and $BBBY, a ClayTrader Video| $GTII | $HPIL | $VNUE | 2,308 Other Stocks | HUD | Kramer |Ex Morgan Stanley Employee |Avid Traders Interview with COO Reggie James|Ex-JPMorgan Gold Traders Ask for No Prison Time in Spoofing Case
✅WhyCh0se🔥$DBMMGround-fl0rInvesting0pp$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
✅WhyCh0se$DBMMGround-fl0rInvesting0pp$GME|$AMC🔥 Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
$DBMM! Digital Brand Media & Marketing Group, Inc. Intellicell Biosciences, Inc. 3-17990
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/opinions/2023/33-11198.pdf Minimum 4 Fraud Cases! "Not Kramer but a Fraud Asscociate" (Moot)! "IT was a Kazillion Years Ago" (Moot) "Evidence" (moot)! ALJ Carol Fox Foelak (moot)! CE drop (moot)! Timely Filings (moot) Are Late Filings also Moot? Asking for a Friend. Happy Belated Groundhogs Day! 02/02/23
The Company has noted that recent prosecutions by the SEC and the DOJ of named individuals who deliberately manipulate and peddle misinformation, often slanderous are cause for regulatory and public policy concerns.
DBMM has long highlighted the negative aspects of those paid to create chaos and scare shareholders. The Company stated in recent Shareholder Updates, that it has sought advice from individuals and organizations prudent in these matters, and participation by third parties in monitoring and gathering information.
The Company has the present ability to move forward to continue to grow its business for the benefit of its shareholders and asks that the Commission affirm the decision of the Law Judge denying revocation of its registration.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, the Company submits that revocation of its registration is not necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors, and that the denial of revocation should be affirmed.
Dated: March 26, 2021 Respectfully Submitted, /s/Maranda Fritz_____________________ Maranda E. Fritz Maranda E. Fritz PC 335 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10017
✅WhyCh0se🔥$DBMMGroundFl0rInvesting0pp$GME|$AMC🔥Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
✅Why cho0se $DBMM?Ground-floorInvestmentopp.$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
The Company has noted that recent prosecutions by the SEC and the DOJ of named individuals who deliberately manipulate and peddle misinformation, often slanderous are cause for regulatory and public policy concerns.
DBMM has long highlighted the negative aspects of those paid to create chaos and scare shareholders. The Company stated in recent Shareholder Updates, that it has sought advice from individuals and organizations prudent in these matters, and participation by third parties in monitoring and gathering information.
✅WhyCh0se🔥$DBMMGround-fl0rInvestment0pp$GME|$AMC🔥Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
Meanwhile, Dec. 9, 2021 34-93747 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Mar. 9, 2022 34-94385 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Jun. 7, 2022 34-95056 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Sep. 6, 2022 34-95675 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Dec. 5, 2022 34-96446 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Mar. 6, 2023 34-97047 Order Extending Time to Issue Decision Jun. 2, 2023 33-11198 Order Dismissing Proceedings
✅WhyCh0se🔥$DBMMGround-fl0rInvesting0pp$GME|$AMC🔥Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
$DBMM litigated w/Asher🔥4theProtection ofShareholders+Mrkt🔥 Asher Enterprises, Inc. has been sanctioned numerous times by the Commission for Securities §5 violations and, under information and belief, intends to commit further Securities Act §5 violations in DBMM's securities.
✅WhyCh0se🔥$DBMM?Ground-fl0Investment0pp$GME|$AMC🔥Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
Topics Related to $DBMM: Wes and company CEOs taking action against short sellers| $GNS, $CRTD, $GTII $FNGR $TRCH $MMAT $MMTLP $GME $AMC and $BBBY, a ClayTrader Video| $GTII | $HPIL | $VNUE | 2,308 Other Stocks | HUD | Kramer |Ex Morgan Stanley Employee |Avid Traders Interview with COO Reggie James|Ex-JPMorgan Gold Traders Ask for No Prison Time in Spoofing Case
inCourt UnderOath🔥D0H! resortsto Defaming $DBMM+Mgmt(D0H! Br. at 25-28.)
$DBMM has obtained resources to complete the re-audit, bring the Company current, & continue its timely filings,
DOE once again rejects the Law Judge’s analysis and conclusion that the Company explained the reasons for the reporting violations and demonstrated that it had taken effective measures to ensure timely filing.
The Company undertook and successfully completed the re-audit, while also addressing and resolving the litigation. Having resolved those issues, the Company then ensured, for three years, the timely filing of its periodic reports. Its assurances are more than credible; they have been borne out by years of filings.
Topics Related to $DBMM: Wes and company CEOs taking action against short sellers| $GNS, $CRTD, $GTII $FNGR $TRCH $MMAT $MMTLP $GME $AMC and $BBBY, a ClayTrader Video| $GTII | $HPIL | $VNUE | 2,308 Other Stocks | HUD | Kramer |Ex Morgan Stanley Employee |Avid Traders Interview with COO Reggie James|Ex-JPMorgan Gold Traders Ask for No Prison Time in Spoofing Case
No available sanction appropriate|Thus Proceeding Dismissed. -------------------------------V. ORDER----------------------------- IT IS ORDERED this administrative proceeding IS DISMISSED. by Administrative Law Judge(ALJ) Carol Fox Foelak
Came off Grey + Pink Current (same thing) +2 211 filed + 211 accepted (same thing) +2
01 or higher for 50 + days(hardly the company's action) +1 (Requires a min. bid price for 30 days above .01 & a bid price above .01 on the day when approval would be made.)
Then the CE DROPPED +1 10 K in (although MOOT) + 1 08 K in (although MOOT) + 1 Commission Dismissed Case (hardly the company’s action)+1
Timely Filings Moot = Sometimes Late Filings Moot = Sometimes Delays Moot = Sometimes 3+ Years Timely Great Stuff
$DBMM litigatedw/Asher🔥4theProtection ofShareholders+Mrkt🔥 Asher Enterprises, Inc. has been sanctioned numerous times by the Commission for Securities §5 violations and, under information and belief, intends to commit further Securities Act §5 violations in DBMM's securities.
The Company has noted that recent prosecutions by the SEC and the DOJ of named individuals who deliberately manipulate and peddle misinformation, often slanderous are cause for regulatory and public policy concerns.
DBMM has long highlighted the negative aspects of those paid to create chaos and scare shareholders. The Company stated in recent Shareholder Updates, that it has sought advice from individuals and organizations prudent in these matters, and participation by third parties in monitoring and gathering information.
DoAll $DBMM Shareholders grasp SECsNeed for100%revocation of registration(s) for all SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing MANDATORY Financials?
Over the last 12+ years Each revocation the SEC Admin. Law Judges have universally supported the SEC DOE Admin. Proceedings to revoke the registrations of 2,308 SEC Registered companies that were severely delinquent in filing Financials.
The one "rare as chicken teeth" exception was A.L.J. Foelak who rendered an Initial Decision to essentially give DBMM a second chance.
The SEC DOE vigorously disagrees with A.L.J. Foelak's Initial Decision & argues through Ad Hominom Attacks the precedent of accepting no excuses for Financials delinquencies & that revocation of registration(s) must also be maintained.
If the D.O.E. lose their precedents there would be havoc in the markets.
In every A.L.J. Final Decision except for $DBMM, the A.L.J. revoked a company's stock depriving both existing and prospective holders of its registered stock of the ability to make informed investment decisions based on current and reliable information."
*** A.L.J. Foelak rendered 100's of those FINAL Decisions and $DBMM's!!!
For any $DBMM shareholder who are seriously interested in understanding the magnitude of the D.O.E. arguments against $DBMM pick any sampling of stocks and go to the respective I-HUB boards to read the A.L.J. FINAL DECISION. Learn WHY those companies had their registration(s) revoked.
Readers may also discover posts about NSS. The entire stock markets would collapse if pervasive NSS existed as so many DBMM'ers pound the table about. Does anyone really think NSS criminals would confine themselves to just $DBMM or a handful of stocks? If NSS was so easy to create they would do it to EVERY stock....Google, Microsoft, Bank stocks, etc. Incomprehensible insanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Over the last 9+ years I have spent 100,000's of hours compiling data to educate I-Hubbers. Surely the $DBMM investors can spend 1 measly hour to research a sampling of the stocks listed below.
The Company has noted that recent prosecutions by the SEC and the DOJ of named individuals who deliberately manipulate and peddle misinformation, often slanderous are cause for regulatory and public policy concerns.
DBMM has long highlighted the negative aspects of those paid to create chaos and scare shareholders. The Company stated in recent Shareholder Updates, that it has sought advice from individuals and organizations prudent in these matters, and participation by third parties in monitoring and gathering information.
✅♻Why$DBMM🔥GroundfloorInvestment🔥$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
inCourtUnderOath🔥D0H! used idiotNamesVs$DBMM+Mgmt(D0H! Br. at 25-28.)
$DBMM has obtained resources to complete the re-audit, bring the Company current, & continue its timely filings,
DOE once again rejects the Law Judge’s analysis and conclusion that the Company explained the reasons for the reporting violations and demonstrated that it had taken effective measures to ensure timely filing.
The Company undertook and successfully completed the re-audit, while also addressing and resolving the litigation. Having resolved those issues, the Company then ensured, for three years, the timely filing of its periodic reports. Its assurances are more than credible; they have been borne out by years of filings.
$DBMM! Digital Brand Media & Marketing Group, Inc. Intellicell Biosciences, Inc. 3-17990
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/opinions/2023/33-11198.pdf Minimum 4 Fraud Cases! "Not Kramer but a Fraud Asscociate" (Moot)! "IT was a Kazillion Years Ago" (Moot) "Evidence" (moot)! ALJ Carol Fox Foelak (moot)! CE drop (moot)! Timely Filings (moot) Are Late Filings also Moot? Asking for a Friend. Happy Belated Groundhogs Day! 02/02/23
$DBMM litigated w/Asher🔥4theProtection ofShareholders+Mrkt🔥 Asher Enterprises, Inc. has been sanctioned numerous times by the Commission for Securities §5 violations and, under information and belief, intends to commit further Securities Act §5 violations in DBMM's securities.
✅♻Why$DBMM🔥GroundfloorInvestment🔥$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
✅♻Why$DBMM🔥GroundfloorInvestment🔥$GME|$AMC Level $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
Topics Related to $DBMM: Wes and company CEOs taking action against short sellers| $GNS, $CRTD, $GTII $FNGR $TRCH $MMAT $MMTLP $GME $AMC and $BBBY, a ClayTrader Video| $GTII | $HPIL | $VNUE | 2,308 Other Stocks | HUD | Kramer |Ex Morgan Stanley Employee |Avid Traders Interview with COO Reggie James|Ex-JPMorgan Gold Traders Ask for No Prison Time in Spoofing Case
✅♻Why$DBMM🔥GroundfloorInvestment🔥$GME|$AMCLevel $DBMM @dbmm_group Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to $GME and $AMC
✅Why chose DBMM?
Positioned to disrupt multitrillion-dollar global market Ground-floor investment opportunity Comparisons to GameStop and AMC
$DBMM $HPIL $GTII HUD $VNUE Any more?Asking for a Friend
Minimum 4 Fraud Cases! "Not Kramer but a Fraud Asscociate" (Moot)! "IT was a Kazillion Years Ago" (Moot) "Evidence" (moot)! ALJ Carol Fox Foelak (moot)! CE drop (moot)! Timely Filings (moot) Are Late Filings also Moot?Asking for a Friend. Happy Belated Groundhogs Day! 02/02/23
Commision✅Drops $DBMM case dueto Data Leak Mistake✅
$DBMM! Digital Brand Media & Marketing Group, Inc. Intellicell Biosciences, Inc. 3-17990
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/opinions/2023/33-11198.pdf Minimum 4 Fraud Cases! "Not Kramer but a Fraud Asscociate" (Moot)! "IT was a Kazillion Years Ago" (Moot) "Evidence" (moot)! ALJ Carol Fox Foelak (moot)! CE drop (moot)! Timely Filings (moot) Are Late Filings also Moot? Asking for a Friend. Happy Belated Groundhogs Day! 02/02/23
The Company has noted that recent prosecutions by the SEC and the DOJ of named individuals who deliberately manipulate and peddle misinformation, often slanderous are cause for regulatory and public policy concerns.
DBMM has long highlighted the negative aspects of those paid to create chaos and scare shareholders. The Company stated in recent Shareholder Updates, that it has sought advice from individuals and organizations prudent in these matters, and participation by third parties in monitoring and gathering information.
$DBMM Accumulating Data🟩Potential Action Vs Clown Facts🟩
The Company has noted that recent prosecutions by the SEC and the DOJ of named individuals who deliberately manipulate and peddle misinformation, often slanderous are cause for regulatory and public policy concerns.
DBMM has long highlighted the negative aspects of those paid to create chaos and scare shareholders. The Company stated in recent Shareholder Updates, that it has sought advice from individuals and organizations prudent in these matters, and participation by third parties in monitoring and gathering information.
$DBMM Accumulating Data✅Potential Action Vs ClownFacts✅
The Company has noted that recent prosecutions by the SEC and the DOJ of named individuals who deliberately manipulate and peddle misinformation, often slanderous are cause for regulatory and public policy concerns.
DBMM has long highlighted the negative aspects of those paid to create chaos and scare shareholders. The Company stated in recent Shareholder Updates, that it has sought advice from individuals and organizations prudent in these matters, and participation by third parties in monitoring and gathering information.
IT IS ORDERED this administrative proceeding IS DISMISSED. by Administrative Law Judge(ALJ) Carol Fox Foelak
November 12, 2019
This Initial Decision shall become effective in accordance with and subject to the provisions of Rule 360 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. § 201.360. Pursuant to that Rule, a party may file a petition for review of this Initial Decision within twenty-one days after service of the Initial Decision. A party may also file a motion to correct a manifest error of fact within ten days of the Initial Decision, pursuant to Rule 111 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. § 201.111. If a motion to correct a manifest error of fact is filed by a party, then a party shall have twenty-one days to file a petition for review from the date of the undersigned’s order resolving such motion to correct a manifest error of fact. The Initial Decision will not become final until the Commission enters an order of finality. The Commission will enter an order of finality unless a party files a petition for review or a motion to correct a manifest error of fact or the Commission determines on its own initiative to review the Initial Decision as to a party. final as to that party. If any of these events occur, the Initial Decision shall not become ______________________________ Carol Fox Foelak Administrative Law Judge S o u r c e : https://www.sec.gov/alj/aljdec/2019/id1389cff.pdf
Timely Filings Don't Matter It became Great Stuff November 12, 2019
Market Data 
Markets 
/production/original_523167995.gif)
/production/original_535882261.png)
AI
