Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[StayHumble]

Should we still send posts to Maranda Fritz&Linda Perry? Asking for a Friend of Mine Best thing is silence|let the market sort it out.

DBMM'ers have my permission to copy my post and send it to Maranda Fritz and Linda Perry.

A DBMM advocacy post: If there is another 90 day extension tomorrow it is plausible to think there could be interminable 90 day extensions. No-one wins with the interminable 90 day extensions, not the SEC D.O.E., not A.L.J. Foelak, and most importantly, not Digital Brand Media.

So then, instead of the very unproductive back and forth bantering on whether the SEC D.O.E. is wrong or right, or Digital Brand Media is wrong or right, or A.L.J. Foelak was wrong or right, shareholders can individually or as a group contact Maranda Fritz and Linda Perry directly and suggest the following:

#1. Maranda Fritz as DBMM's Lawyer and Linda Perry could negotiate a deal with the SEC D.O.E. to accept revocation that protects the SEC D.O.E. demand for "precedents' (i.e. revocation), protects the judicial integrity of A.L.J. Foelak's Initial Decision, and provides a window for DBMM to quickly reregister with the SEC whereby the SEC commits to not holding up a FORM 10 to reregister with interminable questions. DBMM could be reregistered within 60 days, and DBMM could again ask a Market Maker to submit a FORM 211 to FINRA to obtain quotations. Optimal timeframe 90 days, the equivalent of one 90 day extension.....no more Caveat Emptor and no more 90 day extensions!! Everyone wins.

#2. Maranda Fritz and Linda Perry could cite a D.O.E. recommendation in their O.I.P. against Legacy Xchange Inc. that had their registration revoked on Nov. 30,2022. In the D.O.E.'s arguments they wrote "If, after revocation, Legacy is able to meet the relevant requirements, it may file a Form 10 to re-register its securities under Exchange Act Section 12(g)". This is the first time I have seen this inclusion in a D.O.E. argument for revocation, and Maranda Fritz and Linda Perry could negotiate a deal citing the D.O.E.'s own words.

Page 13 section 58, after the Secretary's signature:
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/opinions/2022/34-96401.pdf


I suggest not contaminating any contact with Maranda Fritz or Linda Perry with NSS conspiracies. Wouldn't they already know if there was an NSS issue with DBMM?

Ridiculous. The pumpers out post the naysayers by almost 3 to 1 which is what the 3rd party will tell Linda. The most nonsense posts are by the pumpers and are hurting the company by doing so.

Continual garbage like 'revocation guaranteed' just make and DD sound like stupidity. And the jibberish goes quiet when asked for proof, LOL. A friend of mine once told me 'pumpers cost investors more than bashers do'. Its too bad the ridiculousness doesnt stop.

Still waiting for those 1000s of investors who were going to buy 100s of millions of shares once the CE was dropped? Maybe they are in hiding instead of asher.
Stop with the ridiculous accusations and veiled hints and we all will be fine.