Replies to post #235501 on Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Jetmek_03052]

So true! Why DOESN'T Linda comply with the requested SEC changes???

Let's face it....when the company was on a legitimate trading venue, they paid for EVERYTHING using SHARES! So Linda could spend the money complying with the requested changes and then once on a legitimate trading tier, she could simply (ONCE AGAIN) pay for the money spent using shares!

It's OBVIOUS the shareholders don't pay any heed to how many shares are being used! What's another 50 ~ 100 million shares to Linda? It's NOTHING!

If she did it, she and her little scheme of a company would be back trading in no time at all!

But NO! Linda is a "Harvard Grad"!! She KNOWS BETTER!

LMFAO!

Shareholders! Write Linda! Tell her to stop SCREWING AROUND and just MAKE THE CHANGES.

Linda Perry. Harvard grad extraordinaire !

Hahahahaha!

[hendigitty]

I dont think their is a difference when it comes to OTC Markets. Before it

got to Judge Foelak DBMM was compliant in their filings and up to date for

almost 2 years. That was the issue at hand then. Hence Foelak's ID in favor

of DBMM. Fast forward 2 years later and DBMM is still consistently and

currently fiiling on time. Just because the SEC dont see it that way OTC

Markets does. When 9/28 comes around and all the shells and non filers get

kicked to the curb what are they going to do about DBMM whos a current

filer for the last 4 years. How can they be kicked to the curb...according

to OTC Markets they're current. Meanwhile I'm kung fu gripping my bag to see

if Gensler and his team can sniff this out or find them a whistleblower to

bring the darkness into light...whichever comes first. All I know is the

window of delay is closing and fast.


#CEtoPINKtoDBOOMtoDABOOM