Replies to post #12174 on All Things Mobile Analytic Inc (ATMH)

[DD_dempsey]

You're very welcome Janice. $TRON-- RE: Case # and your queries:

With TRON, the documents that you have supplied actually go a long way when explaining what transpired on 12/6/16 hearing and thereafter, by court injunction. Tracy was perceivably able to make the change on 12/15/16 with NVSOS to legally remove Bosticco and replaced him with Morentin. (This is reflected in the NVSOS annual list and now recently issued business cert). More actions followed in January.

Respectfully, I will familiarize mylsef with scribd.com and I thank you again for that suggestion. It's not easy for this old dog to learn new tricks. But- since my time is somewhat short - I just preferred to get the Custodianship case number to you at your request.
NOTE: IT WAS and IS the correct case number. The "-P" is an action classification by petition. Thank you for adeptly pointing that out though for those trying to find the WHOLE PETITION and injunction /order by Judge to vacate see - 1/31/17.

PLEASE READ THE MINUTES on 12/6/16 as they spell out exactly what the Judge determined and this explains why ON 1/10/17- the Judge previewed the shareholder meeting report/ the annual filing and the NVSOS change in directors and as such- IMO - this is evidence that all was in good order and as such on 1/10/17- the judge would have ruled for ADAM TRACY to be put back as custodian and the SHARES given to Bosticco that were in question - RETURNED to Pacific Stock transfer.
This WOULD BE THE BEST CASE For shareholders of TRON and what I do believe when I saw the words "VACATED per judge" on the 1/31/17 mandatory status check.

Please see here on bottom 1/31/17- cancelled. VACATED by judge.





MORE DD -- My understanding is that Hayes and Bosticco are not on any good terms at all. Now note this custodial action was between Tracy and Bosticco

Again - I like the PATENTED technology involved here and it certainly appears that $TRON is securing said technology.

ALSO:: I'm aware that the NVSOS was filed on 12/15 to change directors and remove Bosticco, I think that's in the docket too from 12/6. Please see what you attached. They were allowed to HOLD shareholder meeting based off the 12/6/16 court date minutes. They then. By PROOF on NVSOS, conducted the shareholder meeting to make the change in directors by that legal court injunction. They also filed these documents and OTHERS with Nevada which might serve more useful here.

Again here: for all to read: (thanks to Janice)





Janice- I will dig those up-- the date and proof of the change of directors as well as The annual statement. I think both were submitted around 12/15/16.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOW...even more pertinent to your Query was, HOW can we tell this case was FINISHED?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Aside from thet aforementioned 1/31/17 -vacated by judge issuance and the 1/10/17 meeting where Tracy must proved they had the shareholder annual meetings done and annual filing done, I also noticed that TRON issued a new Business CERT for Nevada. Interestingly, this was done in January of 2017! THUS, it is my STRONG opinion that, this case was determined in favor of TRON under Tracy custodian, and all further action to show cause has been vacated by the Judge. And, That the proper documents were all presented to the judge on 1/10/17 and thus by virtue of how the share exchange occurred, Bosticco would have been ordered to Return those 400mil shares back (issued to his Utah Corp) to Tracy /and thus back to Pacific stock.

Once the TA confirms they have the shares accounted for, the final action in the case is resolved and I presume - Tracy is then officially REMOVED from TRON forever

Please note, my DD is actually on Imedscan. I could care less about Tracy or Bosticco -I hope they are both gone! Truly gone.

As per my DD - I am aware that both ACUENT and Change healthcare REALLY use the proprietary technology owned by Imedscan. From my understanding,- it's actually generating monthly revenues and the profits ray technology now has a few more industries now where it is going to be needed for sure.

I have read ALL your DD on Hayes, Tracy, etc. I feel much more insulated here, with this fact pattern and circumstantial evidence within the court case. if they actually do separate out Imedscan - my DD will prove to be correct as it's truly what holds value.

IMO- Rene Morenitin is a far better choice than any to take over this revenue producing shell. And far better indication that the shell has cleaned it act.

Let's see where this goes. I am going to wait and see how this plays out. If I have read the full documents and minutes correctly, then this judge did indeed green light $TRON- and we should see some pending material actions soon to validate my claims.

[nodummy]

I went to the Clark County court website and downloaded all of the relevant available documents in the Custodianship proceedings for TRON

They only had documents available up to December 5, 2016, but I think there is some good information in the following documents:

1) The Original Custodianship Petition/Complaint filed by Adam Tracy on December 22, 2015

https://promotionstocksecrets.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/TRONApplication_For_Appointment_Of_Custodian__NRS_78_347_1__B___Comp3.pdf

2) The July 22, 2016 Custodian Report filed by Adam Tracy (Barton Hollow LLC)

https://promotionstocksecrets.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/TRONREport_of_Barton_Hollow__LLC__as_Court_Appointed_Custodian_for_Toron__Inc__Sr.pdf

3) And the very important Motion filed by Fabrizio Bosticco on November 21, 2016

https://promotionstocksecrets.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/TRONEx_Parte_Application_for_Order_Shortening_Time_to_Hear_Motion_to_Set_Aside_Order_Appointing_Custodi_Epap.pdf


Unfortunately they don't have the 12/5/06 Opposition to the 11/21 filing available to view/download.


Some of the things I found most interesting about the 11/21/06 filing by Fabrizio Bosticco were:

1) Boticcio's attorney pointed out how Adam Tracy has violated rule 78.347 by not disclosing to the Clark County court in his custodianship filings that he is under SEC investigation.

http://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-078.html#NRS078Sec347

2. An applicant on whose behalf a stockholder has applied to the district court for a custodianship pursuant to subsection 1 shall provide the following information, along with an affidavit attesting that such information is true and correct, to the district court:

(a) A detailed list of all previous applications to a court in any jurisdiction for a custodianship of a publicly traded corporation that were filed by the applicant or an affiliate or subsidiary of the applicant.

(b) If an application listed in paragraph (a) was approved, a detailed description of the activities performed during the custodianship by the applicant or the affiliate or subsidiary of the applicant.

(c) A description of the current corporate status and business operation of any publicly traded corporation for which the applicant and any affiliate or subsidiary of the applicant has held a custodianship.

(d) A full disclosure of any and all previous criminal, administrative, civil or National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., or Securities and Exchange Commission investigations, violations or convictions concerning the applicant and any affiliate or subsidiary of the applicant.

Adam Tracy is under investigation by the SEC

The SEC started an investigation into 15 IPOs done by Adam Tracy in October of 2015

https://promotionstocksecrets.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/AdamSTracyShamIPOs.pdf

The SEC first Subpoenaed Adam Tracy for records in November of 2015

https://promotionstocksecrets.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/SECAdamTracyExhibitB.pdf

In June of 2016 a Complaint was filed against Adam Tracy in the case

https://promotionstocksecrets.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/AdamSTracy.pdf

Adam Tracy has filed custodianship petitions for dozens of abandoned shells since coming under investigation by the SEC and has never disclosed the investigation one single time in any of his dozens of custodianship petitions.

2) Boticcio's attorney pointed out how it was Adam Tracy that faxed the change of officer filing to the Nevada SOS naming Fabrizio Bosticco as the new officer of TRON. It was Adam Tracy that provided the attorney letter verifying the facts in the OTC filings which present Fabrizio Bosticco as the new controlling shareholder and new CEO of TRON.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=TRON&id=158312

https://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=TRON&id=158207

https://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=TRON&id=158205

Boticcio points out how Tracy failed to inform the court of these changes when he filed his Custodianship Report with the court on July 22, 2016.

I'm sure the reason that Tracy didn't inform the court of the changes is because he did the changes without properly holding a shareholders meeting to approve the changes. I'm also pretty sure that Adam Tracy probably does all the changes with all of his custodianship shells without ever actually holding a proper shareholders meeting - yet another violation of Nevada State Law.

The fact that Tracy is using the argument that he didn't hold a shareholders meeting as his defense is strange, especially since as the Custodian, it was his responsibility to have held the shareholder meeting months ago. Tracy is basically admitting that he made corporate changes without getting shareholder approval first. It also exposes the fact that Adam Tracy probably never actually holds any shareholder meetings for any of the dozens of shells he hijacks. He just makes whatever changes he sees fit without doing a proper shareholder meeting first.

3) Boticcio's attorney points out how this isn't the first time that Adam Tracy has sold control of a shell just to take back control of the shell after accepting payment. Exhibition 10 is a lawsuit filed by GF Offshore Energy and Resource Ltd against Adam Tracy after they acquired the China Ivy School Inc (CIVS) shell from Tracy then he allegedly kept control and tried to sell it again. To make the document easy to find I separated it and attached it at the following link:

https://promotionstocksecrets.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/GFOffshorevsTracyCIVSshell.pdf

In that Complaint, GF Offshore Energy & Resources Ltd claims they made every payment that Adam Tracy asked for.

They also make another interesting statement about how Adam Tracy pushed them into hiring Cathedral Stock Transfer as the new TA for the entity charging them $30,000/month (which was a discount off the original $37,200/month price). Apparently, a normal TA only charges around $550/month.



How is it that Adam Tracy can be Custodian, the Transfer Agent (through Cathedral Stock Transfer), Attorney (through Securities Compliance Group, Ltd), Investors Relation person (through Pacifix Financial, LLC), plus the convertible debt Note holder - all for the same shell?