Replies to post #85580 on NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)

[exwannabe]

I do NOT equate this with Woodford admitting that he received inside information.

Furthermore, if he did receive such, it was a reg FD violation.

Even if via a third party, it would be illegal for NWBO not to disclose the information once they became aware of the leak.

[flipper44]

There are three different quotes.

1. Nothing untoward.
2. In line with clinical protocol
3. NWBO could still come good.


If you add their comment that they sometimes happen upon inside information, and they will not trade until it is disclosed, I think you can draw your own conclusions.

[CherryTree1]

OK then tell me how he can claim "nothing untoward” (improper, unfavorable, unfortunate) regarding the hold. I don't feel I could make that claim with what I know from public disclosures. Do you have something you want to share that would make you feel like you could make that claim? I am all ears.

[GoodGuyBill]

Evaluate, no doubt the NW comment does not explicitly prove that he received insider information. But the context in which this statement occurred suggests strongly that he did.

Shortly after the a large investment into NWBO, the info hit that the Trial was halted. The stock began to crater. It is most probable that NW called LP to find out wtfwgo. Given the context, I am sure LG and LP HAD to inform him of the details regarding the halt. I believe it is certainly most probable that the comment NW made, ..."Nothing Untoward...", was a direct result of their conversation. In fact NW said as much: He said he met with NWBO management and found“nothing untoward” regarding the screening hold'. Let me rephrase this slightly: NW met with NWBO management and learned the halt was a non-issue, period.