out to lunch
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
doing the math, had you sold at 6 cents you would have been at a 50% loss, had the stock gone to say 12 cents a share you would have been break even, and at 50 cents you would have made about a better than 33% return per year on your initial investment, yes that does suck--NOT!
imho patience was your better play
I seem to recall a post before i signed up at ihub that accused you of making a profit.
At any rate i don't take it back, because that's what I recall
unfortunately, most likely yes! eom
from what is posted here they read this board regularly, and imho they are focused on prevailing in their legal troubles above all else, however, the current run up no doubt has given them a taste of victory, how they will respond to that I do not know.
Miles, imho its clear you made bucks in the last run, there is no question of that, and if this gets low enough, despite your loathing of barnett you will be a buyer. Barnett is a proven winner and you know it, you know the pattern of this stock and barnett better than most.
in a few months you will not be able to contain yourself as time and again before, its not in your nature, you have to rub it in to barnett that you made a buck since to you that's like stealing a buck from barnett
imho, there was a true breakout last week, and we broke through the 10 cents reistance and made it support, there is good validation for your position
i hope this turns into a great long term play for everyone
yes, it seems there are additional risks, but if the mm's want to keep everything chugging along they better make their best customers happy--if they can get a trade in on the side all the better!
It seems to me that they can gauge their naked short position in
advance, and if the program sells are not in play they can increase their odds that there will be lower price inventory when they put you guys into play, if you guys get burned them some of them feel it too though it looks set so its always by not as much
looks like we are filling the gap, this might be the first day in years that clyw has "traded like a real stock", a nice smooth filling of the gap on decent volume would prove it,
the bottom line is this, among the ppl that stopped out how many will decide to get back in, and when?
If they believe a settlement is coming they will get back in, since the clock is ticking many will believe that they cannot afford not to be in the stock, hopefully that is what we see
so far it does look like we are getting support at 10 cents, which is wonderful
(last post updated) i made that post prior to the 2010-09-24 document from hotstocked so yes i mean both, thats a compound question and i move to strike
http://www.hotstocked.com/article/2929/calypso-wireless-inc-pink-clyw-stock-rushed-not.html
this is old news? look at the logo they used, from drago's web site, is everyone dense?, note how she has no explaination as to why the stock suddenly went up (she even says it), the most obvious conclusion is that clearly she was decived by drago's listing of court documents and drew the eronious consclusion that there were no court documents that could provide an explaination.
if you called the analyst on this she would have to reply that she made the worng conclusion base on the misleading information provided by drago daic's unauthroized web site. An ex parte action against hotstocked would likely be a no response win verifying the default position (that is calypso's) worse case scenario she provides a declairaton that she believes the site was authentic and up to date.
the NEWS HERE IS THAT FINALLY THE COMPANY HAS AN EXAMPLE OF A CONSEQUENCE OF DRAGO INCOMPLIANCE WITH COMPANY REQUESTS and a case for damages, anyone that denies that this is an important example should step down as co moderator and not post on this board any more.
the company needs examples of damage, anyone that says anything different should not be on the message board representing the company
its highly likely that the lawyer has not been asked to review this document, yet everyone has already made a conclusion for him
what a joke
It's a forward looking statement (but i'm optimistic that one day it will be true)
like the most recent pr, barnett is overall exceeding the bar for a typical pink so i can believe that soon he will be of of it
Management finally has proof that they are suffering significant on going damage from the web site they have two responsibilites to stop the damage and to seek compensation.
imho, the company needs to make that the threshold for preponderance, or is it clear and convincing evidence? imho this puts the company over the top in both categories
they cannot afford to let this go
we are facing a bp deep water horizon problem w/ o the explosion, the company haa a responsibility to stop the leak now.
because we now have the money counter ticking, you are missing the point this is not just on www.calypsowirelessinc.com its also on the russian post, the russian post is incorrect because of daic's bad faith, in the abscense of drago doing nothing the company has to attempt to seal the leak in order to claim financial loss, right now the loss is huge before the russian article the loss was arguable and nebulas now it is not, evasive action needs to be taken, as it stands now daic is on the hook for 40 Million from friday, i suspect that the fastest he could get the russian article down is by wensday or thursay that puts the loss (including treble damage award for keeping it up there in bad faith) at between 160 million and 200 million dollars tangable damage award / that is a 40 million dollar tangable (at 10 Million dollars per day that the russian article is up),to 50 Million dollar award based on 4 to 5 days plus trebble damages.
i repeat, to claim this the company must notice diaic immediately and then move for ex parte actions against his isp and the russian site to "stop the leak", if it takes untill the end of the first week of october so be it, then messer's williamson and daic even own more,
but the company needs to move now to stop the damage. This damage discovery is on the face of it new and no longer insidious, but obvious to calypso management and counsel and must be stopped immediately to minimize the damage done to the company since it is of such a huge extent and magnitude.
yes prior to friday the company could take the path of least resistance in going after drago, no longer, now its time to move for the jugular immediately sieze the moment, and stop their extortion cold,
It does not matter if drago shuts it down any more, he's incured HUGE MONITARY DAMAGES on the order that the man has claimed against calypso.
THE BOD SHOULD BE BREIFING THE EXPARTE MOTION NOW AND SUBMITTING IT FIRST THING MONDAY MORNING
qed
Notice to Messer's Diac and Willimson-NB: re the following quote:
Public Notice to Messer’s Daic and Williamson
This link Illustrates and quantifies the ongoing damage that has occurred to Calypso Wireless as a result of Messer’s Daic and Williamson’s refusal to comply with Calypso Wireless’s request to remove their unauthorized website that misrepresents Calypso Wireless Inc. that is:
http://www.calypsowirelessinc.com
As a result of this egregious inaction the following website has made misrepresentations that have damaged and will continue to damage Calypso Wireless at a rate of $10,000,000 per trading day (plus treble damages):
http://www.hotstocked.com/article/2929/calypso-wireless-inc-pink-clyw-stock-rushed-not.html
Please note that in the photo under the chart ( http://www.hotstocked.com/articles-img/small/CLYW_from_the_site.png ) they are using is the Calypso Wireless logo-pic from the site registered to Drago Daic, the site suggests to the reader, in this case Ms. Ekaterina Zelenkova, that it is up-to-date on the Tmobile court documents. The writer clearly indicated in her diagram that she sees no reason for the rally that began on 2010-09-22 and only cites news released several months earlier relating to a delayed market response to the company’s effort to keep up-to-date with patent maintenance fees.
She then goes on to discuss the significance in brief and uses the Logo taken from the hope page of the www.calypsowirelessinc.com page to demonstrate to readers that she has done her homework and were she has been looking for information. However looking at the hyperlink on that same page titled “Litigation Update”, its clear that she could not have missed the opportunity to access the Litigation Update and that clearly it was her professional responsibility to do so. Hence it must be assumed that she did review the page with the url www.calypsowirelessinc.com/litigation.htm. However, as is clear this page has not been updated in over a year and hence she had no reason to believe that there was a legitimate reason for the rally that began on 2010-09-22 the day that a 90 day extension for the purposes of settling with Tmobile was entered into the record. As a result of the malicious antics of Messer’s Daic and Williamson’s unwillingness to comply with requests from Calypso Wireless’s Management / Board of Directors countless investors have been turned away by Ms. Ekaterina Zelenkova’s article.
Again this has unquestionably damaged the company. Economic damages can be estimated but as a rough approximation Damages should be estimated to be $10,000,000.00 per day and of course treble damages must be added (I will surrender the task of parsing out the exact method of damage calculation to the BOD, but may I suggest the long term damage of turning investors away may be that investors are never to return again further it is clear that less than 1 in 20 investors will actually look to see if the court document information as misrepresented by the www.calypsowirelessinc.com web site are going to go any further, if Ms. Ekaterina Zelenkova did not then why should they? ).
Therefore I demand as should the Calypso Wireless Board of Directors, in the interest of shareholders that Messer’s Diac and Williamson contact Ms. Ekaterina Zelenkova immediately and stop this ongoing damage to the company and its shareholders. I also ask that they immediately “take down” Mr. Daic’s website www.calypsowireless.com .
I also ask Calypso Wireless Counsel to file a pleading / counter-claim for this damage immediately and serve Mr. Daic’s provider and Hot Stocked with an ex-parte injunction ASAP.
Respectfully
ooag_long
I have included the following documents as evidence which I have uploaded from gifs that I screen captured this evening, 2010-09-24 (where this post was completed after midnight), I swear under penalty of perjury that these documents were captured today and are true and correct copy’s of their web representations and submit them here as evidence against Messers Daic and Williamson:
the natural gas in caddo parish is formadable, there will be a huge push to natural gas in commercial vehicles, my estimate based on the 5 billion that will be going into the program is that natural gas consumption will increase by 10 percent on that alone, given the gas in storage and current flows etc. this will mean that in about 3 years huge drawdowns will become the norm and the value of caddo will skyrocket--dont forget that chk is moving away from natural gas in all futre development, and imho, there will be more consolodation in the services business neaning that w/ the exception of smaller operators, drillers will be able to stay afloat w/ less business hence reversing the current glut in natural gas
its progress, what else can anyone say, fat should be averaging down
lol, who do you guess? my guess is lanza, for a few bucks he can kick AB in the nuts by taking the company name and then do things to screw w/ it (like maybe issueing shares and short selling fooling brokers to take shares that are not for ooag into thinking they are) the reason for AB's epiphany is unclear, but imho all the AB bashing on this delaware stuff i always chalked that up to AB not having good corporate counsel (meaning not spending enough money for trouble shooters) so he has been winging some of the fine points which is understandable as its hard to master everything when you are dealing w/ scum like lanza, on the other hand what made me resign from com was the issue of the former counsel getting a chunck of the pie of which i can't approve, however according to my dd, it will likewise be much less of an issue just has been shown w/ the others so for now im back posting
Real
DonLeopoldo, CLYW has just broken through resistance, wake up, your time is I know you have been watching it for years, wake up, you are needed, I hope you still own your position
ClayTrader, today clyw.pk broke through 2+ year resistance on much heavier than average volume, the catylist appears to be an un opposed motion to the stay litigation w/ the goal of settling w/ Tmobile
IMHO newbies don't understand that this kind of a resistance breakthrough means that 4-5 cents is now impenetrable support, whatever your opinion, longs would like to see it find its way back to the clyw message board--hopefully w/ one of your slick video reviews, imho a breakout of this magnitude warrents it
tia
ooag_long
ok will do, clyw up another 5% since my post, btw barnett had posted w/ ooag the "financials" it looks like soon he will be moving forward, reading between the lines we are lookingat 5OOK / quarter as it stands now, market is not really accepting that as yet so will see
ps, imho one can catch it, CLYW.pk, early here because it hasn't even made it to the ticker buzz cloud yet!
CJ, hi, the stock that the blowhard ben lurkin was pumping is rallying, that is clyw.pk, a recent court document stated they they stayed a motion in the fedral patent trial because they were in talks w/ tmobile to settle (you have to read the message board to find the document they may not have sticky posted it--they need a new hotshot moderator), the motion was unopposed by tmobile--this may mean a settlement is immenent (not sure about the time frame here) but this would be huge, it looks like the market senses this as they have broken a 2 and 1/2 year high (approxy) and now are over 25% the mendoza buyout price of 4 and 1/2 cents when shareholders
float is well locked up by longs imho and most are looking for much higher from what is being posted
risky yes but looks at the least to be a good flip
Real
wow, i just cheked out the the ihub featured add on this message list to the right, they have a video on the other end of the link that shows how scammers can rip one off using rfid technology, here is the link incase that it does not show up later, what an eye opener
http://www.idstronghold.com/
probably because there is more to come, as there should be, as we all know once lanza pockets money from bdgr shareholders and lanza's fingers are greasy sticky at the least--its one of those cases were the smaller the bureaucracy the longer it takes--he probably breakes it all into one's and keeps recounting untill he is so sick of all self-imposed fuss that he can finally bare to part w/ it--lol
If you look at my old posts I suggested that Barnett was actually entitled to much higher compensation than the current financial statement says here,
as far as any aquisitions, w/ cash flow from bdgr AND LANZA, we are looking at 4 x 500,000+ or upwards of 2 M / year as it stands now, its a very simple balance sheet, I am not sure if it suggests there has been a settlement w/ the lawyer, or will be used as evidence in the upcoming hearing,
I am getting excited about the company again, and w/ the full ignore, its a pleasure to be posting again free from all of the blowhards
:)
cheers
legal fees(?) + monies paid to barnett amount to $530,000.00 + money that was SPENT in q2, there is money "due" to "gulf gate" of about $200,000.00, all other debts are fully in control of the company / management. Note they do not state goodwill, or intangables etc = overall balance sheet is clean!
looks like the company is possibly capible of bringing in 2.1 Million dollars / year at this point, and we still don't have details regarding lanza. Interesting is that the company's "paid in" about 2.6 M, give you an indication of the age of the "company" imho the financials are fully doable in that case having swept away all of lanza's garbage no doubt the accountants have some splicing to do, but imho its all doable and good!
all in all revs appear to be proven up to 1 cent a share, puts this company, RIGHT NOW, AT 5+ CENTS A SHARE in value, easy, more as more info--expect stock price to resume appreciation
good luck to all,
not quite enough info do demand that the blowhards remove themselves from the board, but otherwise goode enough--not mad at barnett anymore...
Real
Mickey Rourke's character in The Rainmaker would be proud!eom
Na, its worse using a real company because it takes alot longer to figure out the scam
"not to exceed $20.00"
<<Article 2178 Attorney's fees recoverable in certain cases procedure costs Hereafter any person in this state having a valid bona fide claim against any person or corporation doing business in this state for personal services rendered or for labor done or for material furnished or for overcharges on freight or express or for any claim for lost or damaged freight or for stock killed or injured by such person or corporation its agents or employes may present the same to such person or corporation or to any duly authorized agent thereof in any county where suit may be instituted for the same and if at the expiration of thirty days after the presentation of such claim the same has not been paid or satisfied he may immediately institute suit thereon in the proper court and if he shall finally establish his claim and obtain judgment for the full amount thereof as presented for payment to such person or corporation in such court he shall be entitled to recover the amount of such claim and all costs of suit and in addition thereto a reasonable amount as attorney's fees provided he has an attorney employed in the case not to exceed twenty dollars to be determined by the court or jury trying the case Acts 1909 p 93 >>
imho, barnett will rack up another relative "win"
what ever happened to mineseeker? eom
time to say flush to mgmt and the rest of this garbage
Mick or John, is authorized now up to 20B?eom
ty for the report as a result im pulling my pitch from the board, lanza is truely the greasiest pile of scum in the pinks he uses a "real company" as a front for a worthless stock
the board is open for a new assist. mod, ive resigned.
good luck all
outahere!!!
late
real
yup , im out of this pos, finally whew!
barnett can choke on the smoke comming out of his arse
late
Lanza knows that all to well, but the smoother this goes for everyone the better, even nathan, it detracts from his contribution if he makes a stink out of this and it hurts his reputation, barnett's defense should be very matter of fact regarding the determination, if we can get nathan to 300 bucks an hour, that would still be a huge hourly salary, the bitterness would wear off once he started to count his money, further, if he gets shares and helps barnett by making nice and being a tout he could really rake in some serious dough, if he gets greedy lanza will sense the weakness and stiff everyone
well i'm not happy about the situation w/ the attorney, but he should have sued to keep himself as the contingency attorney instead of just walking away at the first sign of barnett telling him to go, that was his mistake, and imho will cost him, but yes, its starting to look like being a moderator here might have been a mistake, but i am thick skinned, so i'll stick around to see what happens