Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
ORCA SAYS: OS 317 MILLION & ZERO DILUTION FOR YEARS: ARE YOU KIDDING ME? IT WAS ORIGNIALLY OS OF 8 MILLION SHARES AT .24. THEN IT WENT TO OS OF 16MILLIOM "DILUTION, PRICE DROPED LIKE A ROCK AND CONTINUED TO BE DELUITED BY MORE STOCK BEING DUMPED ON THE MARKET, WHARE DID IT ALL COME FROM? FROM 8 MILLION TO NOW 317 MILLION, AND AT WHAT PRICE TO DAY, BUT SORRY THATS DILUTION.
OK, PLEASE HELP ME OUT: WHAT BROKAGE HOUSE WILL TAKE OUR STOCK CERTIFICATES TO OPEN AN ACCOUNT?? THANKS.
OK Stock_Barber, I'll take you up on that buy offer for all my stock at 10 cents, 12,500,000 shares. WHAT SAY YOU?
I'll take you up on that offer 10 cents for all my shares, 12,500,000.
dr. bob beverly
My group controls 44 million shares. this stock has done nothing sense we were purchased. at that time there was only 8 million shares on the float,200 million authorized, we were on a two year restriction, the stock price was 24 cents, during that time someone started dumping shares ten's of millions of shares???
I believe it was Ed Hayter. a pump and dumper. where did all these shares come from???
HOW DO YOU GET 294,564 MILLION SHARES ON THE MARKET, WITH OUT SOMEONE DUMPING THEM? THEY RAISED THE AUTHORIZED FROM 300M TO 500M, WHEN AND WHY?
OK, BUT THAT DOESN'T CHANGE ANYTHING, THE STOCK IS STILL BEING MANIPULATED,
AND SOMEONE IS STILL PUMPING AND DUMPING. AND IT IS GOING NO WERE. SO WHAT HAS CHANGED??? NOTHING.
I remember when the stock was .24, and only 8 million shares were on the float, and only 200 million authorized, where did all these shares come from now, and who dumped them????
Captain the KEY Words in your post is quit interesting:"I'm venturing a guess" thats all this stock has been guessing what will happen next. Guess whos comming to dinner?
ditka just give it time and the pumping BS pr's will start comming out, i hope not , but if Ed is involved it will happen
See Captain, you still have no clue on the value of the Technology that was given to UDHC and Clayton. Even today it is the best out there for the price it was offered at, but you like Clayton have no real idea about video image compression technology. Clayton and his so called tech team tried using wireless technology that was around when SNV's wired technology was created, Snv's technology was cheaper, the image compression refreash rates were better and there was on degragation when a 100 people look at the images at the same time. But if you would like to get into a video image commpression technology discussion, you might want to do a little researgh first.You will fine there has not been much in improvments in that area in the technology world, it's pretty much the same as it was back in 2000, wired technology is and always will be the best as for viewing clearity versus wireless, Kinderview is currently using wireless technology that was around in 2000 at a more expensive cost to the customer than SNV's technology would have been. Captian, when you design a video image compression technplogy and deployee it in a location or locations let me know, until then you might consider staying in your field of knowledge penny stocks.
Chiron, I believe at these low prices Ed is buying up and maybe Mr. Wiess, some one has to be selling for some one to buy, I believe Mr.Wiess has a plan,but he's not telling you or anyone else for what ever the reason, why would you keep your current shareholders in the dark about your business plan? But I also believe he is not alone in this, I believe Ed is in the back ground just waiting, and he will release his hord of shares, and of coures some will make some money on the ride up, while most will lose. Thats been ED's way of working the penny stocks for years, he is always in the back groung, until it is time to move his people in to key positions, and start all over. You just have to wait and see who is right or wrong here. Good Luck
Ditka, When was Mr. Wiess last news release or up date?, No one here has a clue where he is taking tihs company because no one can even get in contact with this wonderful managent team running UDHC,in cluding the Stock transfer agent. Remember this The SNV shareholders hold 44% of the comon stock while the rest of you hold somewhere in the range of 8%, because the 20 million phantom shares were pretty much bought up by SNV shareholders.So you conversation is just cheap idle talk.
CaptianJim I do not know or care who has the SNV shares considering they were all turned over to UDHC during the SVN stock trade deal, but the Kinderview shares promised at a 1 for every 10 UDHC swap. UDHC shareholders should be concerned and demand their shares, that is the deal ED made while he was the UDHC CEO after Claytons death, even though I would like to know how Ed got control of UDHC if he was not involved or a share holder at that time. I would further like to know how many shares Mr Wiess gave Ed Hayter for his deal being made to take control of UDHC, there are only so many authorized shares available, around 28 million out of 100 million. SNV share holders control 44 million, 28 million on the current float. Not hard to figure out what is left, but to figure out where they are is something different. By the way Kinderview is SNV,Kinderview changed it's name back in September 2009 to Securenetview, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, with 55 million authorized common shares and 20 million perfered shares.The bottom line here is the SNV shareholders got a royal screwing so far.
ditka Yes I'm nuts, but your closed minded to think Ed has nothing to do with UDHC now or in the past. Answer one question how did Ed Hayter get control of UDHC when Clayton Young Died?
Next question what did he receive for turning over UDHC to Mr. Wiess? these are questions that need to be answered for the benifit of the IUDHC shareholders. 100 million shares Authorized:
SNV shareholders control 44 million, 28 million on the float, that leaves 28 million, who controls these? 20 million out of the 28 million on the float are the phantom shares dumpd on the market during the pump up of the SNV deal by Clayton Young. Who do you think dumped them? was it you, was it Clayton, was it possibally ED? there was no divy screw up, and if you believe that there was your screwed up in your thinking, and as nuts as I am.
Well, Well, Well I see it's time for a REALITY checkup from the neck up for many of you, still hanging out on this stock and this board, with no real clue to what your talking about. Fact Mr Wiess
bought UDHC from who? Ed Hayter. Question here is how did Ed Hayter get Back control of UDHC in the first place? Clayton gave Ed shares for his take over, question here is How many shares did he give Ed, un recorded. I guess about 20 million, the phantom amount dumped on the market during the divy scandel,dropping the price. Whos buying all this stock back at such a low price? Guess who: I bet Good old boy ED. Now next question How many unrecorded shares did Mr.Wiess give Ed Hayter for his take over? Is'nt it funny right after Ed took back over UDHC, he sold the assets of SNV to the family of Clayton, leaving the UDHC shell with no assets, (emty), with the promise UDHC share holders would receive one share of Kinderview for every 10 of UDHC. Yet none of the KV shares have been issued. further All SNV shares 44 million were to become unrestriced after one year. All SNV share holders have been told to remove the restriction they must pay a hefty $100 trans fer fee to the stock trans fer agent.
The bottom line here is Mr.Wiess is a puppy dog on a rope held by Ed Hayter, and when the right time comes the stock will go up so that Ed can unload his Phantom shares, and no one here seems to want question how he got them, or what Mr Wiess is really up to.
their is litigation smoke in the air here.
Have a REALITY day.
First Bob Beverly had nothing to do with UDHC and or the way it was run, nor did he have anything to do with the running of SNV after being taken ove by UDHC. Again you UDHC folks have no clue what your talking about, always placing the blame on the wrong people for the way UDHC was and is run. Bottomline Clayton Young did not follow through with what he said he would do with aquiring SNV and expanding it, and getting UDHC stock up to $1.00. Now the ball is in Allen richards court along with ED Hayter. I'm suprised no one here even mentions ED Hayter, Why not? He was clearly involve in the SNV Deal happing and funding Clayton Young in UDHC, as well as possibly dumping those 18 million phantom shares on the market, making him a nice profit off the hype from the SNV deal and he is probbaly the one buying them back at these low prices. think about it, if you have the ability to even think clearly.
Reality Check
It's time for a Reality Check: first gold duck you have no understanding what it is your posting sometimes, please let me give you and the rest of this board some clearity. Kinderview is Securenetview, Kinderview changed it's corporate name in Nov 2001 to Securenetview, a Nevada corporation, a privately held company. Kinderview or SNV was never a public held company.Next the 44 million shares are UDHC shares and should be, that was the deal Clayton Young and ED Hayter, and Allen Richards made
to aquire SNV -Kinderview. The Real Problem here is all the lying Clayton, Ed Hayter and Allen Richard have done and now are doing. Allen Richards should be held accountable to All UDHC shareholders to deliver any shares as promised in the sale of SNV, if it really was sold.Under Rule 508 of the New York SEC rules they must disclose any and all transactions if you request in writing, I suggest you all request in writing under that rule 805. Request how many shares Clayton gave ED Hayter for UDHC, and you will find those 18,million phaytom shares dumped on the market, during the SNV deal. then request information on any and all tranactions of the sale of SNV and any other information you want. If no responce it's time for all to build a financial legal war chest and sue UDHC, SNV, ED Hayter, Allen Richards, MRS Young and any other person in that company.
Thats the Reality. NOW DO SOMTHING OTHER THAN TALK!
Well Well, I see everybody here is still grumbling at each other.
It's time for a Reality Check. Just because Mr. Young is gone, does not mean UDHC shareholders should just disaper and be quite, Mr.Young made a lot of promises to a lot of people and did not follow through. Now it is up to Allen Richards to step in and follow up on those commitments, It does not matter who he sales SNV to, your going to get some VALUE (stock)for the Sale, thats more than you have now, and if he and Ed Hayter take it public it just might be worth something, if your not on board in a positave way you might consider jumping ship.
What UDHC shareholders need now is a clear understanding on where this new CEO is going with UDHC, it looks like they may let it go in the craper, and pick up SNV and run.
While everbody's been consentrating on Clayton, I'm sure the management has been making plans, and I do not see any benifits as far as UDHC shareholders current stock holdings, increasing in value (price), and being keep clearly informed.
I have done my 8 months research quietly and believe that Mr. Ed Hayter has been in control all along, and I further believe he is the one that dumped 18 million phantom shares on the market, not a divy screw up, but many of you have been blinded by your personal greed to not see what was happening, THINK about it, Were did 18 million free trading shares come from? How did Clayton obtain control of UDHC? Did he exchange free trading shares for the CEO position? If so hwo many did he give? and who did he give them to? These are some of the questions you should be asking between yourselfs, instead of bickering at each other.
This is a Reality Check!!!!!
Jerle Shannara, maybe killed a dream, but not the technology and not the potiential to reap hughe profits in the Daycare viewing arena. As for military the daycare viewing is wide open.
Remember nitch market that should be the focal point for UDHC, one day care at a time, through lead generation at the largest daycare shows, two a year.
Well, Capitan You purchase a system that you think is better than SNVs technology and put it up on the net. And I will purchas SNVs what, you call old technology and put it up on the net and lets compare, because even to date there is nothing that offers refreash rates 22 to 25 frames per second with many people thitting the same cameras with out loss of frame rate. You may have spoke to one or two SNV people but I have spoke to hunderds, and they agree Bob Beverly did what he said he would do no matter how long it took. The old SNV technology before Bob Beverly was 2 to 3 frames per second refreash rate, Bob's
energineering team create an AWARDWINNING Technology 20 to 25 frames per second refreash rate in cluding a data base that could handle 100's of thousands of customers, names, and passwords.A gain you have no clue what your talking about, you just like to complain, like Jim Bishop, two pees in a pod, not trying to help Move Udhc forward but down ward. Things will change. Good luck all Reality is comming soon.
It's time for a Reality Check, first Reptile, Bob Beverly had no errors nor did he create any errors, you folks know nothing about Bob Beverly, sence you canot beat up on Clayton now your picking on Bob what a joke. Bob Beverly saved 0ver 700 share holders, at least he did every thing he said he would do and even stayed in contact with all shareholders and still does.His only commitment was to get the company in the hands of someone that had a publicly traded company and would move it forward for the shareholders and give them an exit stratogy of some sort. Clayton Young said he had the financial where abouts to do just that and that he would get the UDHC stock to $1.00. The SNV technology is still by far better that even the technology Clayton has said they have created. The SNV technology was even a lower cost to install at $50 per camera verous $100 per camera Clayton is charging. Unless you can state the specific errors Mr. Beverly has committed I would be very carful what you state and post on this board. You should be focaused on what Mr. Young is going to do to move UDHC forward, Because I know for a fact that Mr. Beverly is clearly focused, and is ready to move forward with the help of many old SNV shareholders to get to the bottom on why Mr. Young is not letting sharehold know what his plan is for UDHC, and why he has let the share price drop so badly. Get some reality in your UDHC Life, Only Mr Young has the answers on where UDHC is going. Through Mr Beverly's research he has formulated the answers on how UDHC and it's management team has gotten in this negative mess and soon will reveal with real clear answers and clearity.
cdnkid10 To date no restricted UDHC shares have been issued to any SNV shareholders. SNV shareholders were told they would receive their shares in 8 weeks from May 30, 2008. Again to Date no shares are issued and SNV sharholder are not happy.
No not Clayton, SNV Shareholders grabbing all they can. And have been for months.
OTCplay your right cost figures a little high. Average 8 camera
system for a day care with at least 100 childern is $50 per camera per month 8X50= $400 per month divided by # of children
$400 divided by 100 = $4.00 per month divided by 28 days the average number of days childern are in daycare $4.00 divided by 28 = .14 centes per day. I was high on the cost and of course the more children the less it cost. .14 centes to have the ability to keep an eye on your child giving you peace of mind.
NOW THATS REALITY!
OTCplayers sorry, you really do not understand SNV's business plan or you would not be saying what your posting. Makes no sence at all. Simple Question for you OTC - for an 8 channel video board that has the capability to produce 480 fps total, how many cameras will the board support and at what number fps per camera would ther be? Then if you get that right. How much bandwith is needed minium to push it out over the internet with out any loss of fps? Now if you can successuflly answer these simple streaming video technology parameters we might think you know what your talking about. If not join anotherboat onanotherboat penny stock. I haveput togeather a little soething in reference to streaming technology parameters below. hope you understand the simplicity.
Key parameters
Resolution (video)
bits horizontal by bits vertical
nnn x nnn
Frequency range (audio)
Hertz (Hz)
e.g., 200Hz - 10,000Hz
Sampling rate
Frames per second (fps) for video
Hz for audio
Keyframes (video)
How often do you 'reregister' your video
Record entire frame
Resync audio to video
Codec
Different for audio and video
Different codecs optimized for differ----
Total amount of data being sent
Bits per second
Optimal versus
what is really going through the pipe
what the computer can decode and present
Davidam, Get your facts streight! Kinderview a division of SNV, KV is dealing with national daycare chains as well as independently owned daycare centers, Kinderview is not on any rating on the pinksheets, but kinderview has a perfect rating and reputation with the National Child Care Association (NCCA) in Washington DC, the NCCA over see's anything that has to do with daycare centers. Again Kinderview and Securenetview are not pink sheet companys.A little research will get you the facts, before you post worthless information.Thats The REALITY Check
for the day.
MCA, Ok if a buy only occurs at the ask, what do you call
buy at 1.8? Isn;t it still a buy, or did some one just give the stock away or did they have to PURCHASE it? When I buy something no matter what it is and what price I paid for it I bought It Period.
oregon1, if there are sales then there must be buys other wise who are you selling to?
Thunderttt, I do not know what web site you went to get a phone number and call it, but it wasn't Securenetview.com, I just went there and clicked on Contact: the numbers are very clear on the bottom of the page. 928-704-9333 - Fax 928-704-9339. Arizona, not San Diego, CA.
Sidedraft, All SNV shares were tendered back to SNV Stock Tresuary so that 100% of all SNV shares are held and not issued to anyone. The exchange agreement gave SNV shareholders UDHC shares for tendering those SNV shares back to SNV where by giving Ulysses a clean private company with no shares issued.
The SNV shareholders became UDHC shareholders not the other way around.
For all of you who are so knowledgable in the aera of a private company becomming a public company, PLEASE READ below. This is the only way a private company can become public, AGAIN THE ONLY WAY. SNV has not done any.NONE of SNV's shares are offered on the market through an IPO nor are they registered with the SEC. THEY ARE HELD PRIVATELY in SNV's STOCK TREASURY. DIG!
While some large and successful companies are still privately-owned, many companies aspire toward becoming a publicly-owned company with the intent to gain another source of raising funds for operations. An initial public offering (IPO) represents a private company's first offering of its equity to public investors. This process is generally considered to be very intensive with many regulatory hurdles to jump over. While the formal process to produce the IPO is well documented and as a result is a fairly well-structured process, the transformational process of which a company changes from a private to a public firm is a much more difficult process.
TIME FOR ANOTHER REALITYCHK, for those of you that have
called SNV or Kinderview, and have gotten an answer mahine. Have you thought about using the machine and leaving a message and your name and phone number? Kindervies number is more for PARENTS or Administrators of the daycare centers that are having problems or concerns in reference to their ability to see their children. The phones are not setup to answer questions of stockholders of Ulyss You might try stockholder relations for Ulysses. For those of you complaining your in the RED you might consider selling your shares at this point then you will be in the GREEN. As for Fort Mohave being in a no were land your right thats why SNV moved from California, San Diego, to cut cost and overhead, and put their money in technology. The SNV/ Kinderview business can run from anywhere. As for Fort Mohave SNV did Research nation wide back in 2003 for a location that had growth potiential. BullHead City AZ had one of the highest growth rates in the country 3 miles north of Fort Mohave
That location could change I understand from the expantion plans there could be many locations soon. Word to the wise, all good and stable things that last,take time to grow. If you have done your DD you would know SNV came thru the roughest times in the history of this country as far as business surving the Dot Com bust 2002 2003. SNV is still here, Their technology has gotten better, and the need for their product and services in their niche market has grown by 300%. Many of your concerns are based not on facts but on penny stock greed, I call it flipping and flapping, buy low flip high, then flap to bring it back down and hopfully start over again. I have noticed many of the flippers are gone or are currently saying nothing, they will be back. Excitement is in the AIR. Can you feel it. STAY POSITIVE
YOR FINANCIAL FUTURE DEPENDS ON OTHERS GETTING EXCITED.Now thats reality!
Well,Well,Well, I see some are at it early to day talking about things they know nothing about, NO CLUE! from the websites looking like hell, to the links going nowhere, I did some research on the links of course some go no where, they've been disconnected while they revamp the need for them, such as investor relations, there are no SNV investors,there are no partners, the links that work are, sales, support, advertising, public relations. Now to website looking like hell, again I did some research, SNV/Kinderview web sites have won many web awards, based on its simplicity of content,use,its clairity in reference to what the company does.There is no other purpose for a website.Oh a few dates might need to be changed, nit picking here. The sites draws over 600,000 hits per month.
The sights are doing what they were designed to do no matter how they appear to you the unknowledgable in web design. Besides the web design will not move the stock up or down, no not one penny will change because of all this talk about the web design.
Now on to more research, do you think SNV shareholders holding 67 million shares cares where the price is currently? No they have 12 months before it becomes unrestricted. The way you flipperes buy and sell sheres here currently keeps the price down, but there will be a time when all the stock is accounted for and any loose shares will be taken by SVN holders at these low prices, then and only then will you see stability, growth, and a real rise in the stock price, and as it comes closer to the release date for those 67 million shares, things will really begin to happen. So keep talking,keep nocking down the price. Thank you, Thank you so much.
Well its time for another reality check. I see most of the flippers have left the board, for now anyway, they made
their money, when the stock was going up they pumped it and when it got to a point they felt it was at a peak they sold, and started talking negative and negative postings, forcing some to sell whereby bringing the price down,then of courcs when the price is down buy it back again and start all over. As I said many are gone but they forgot the 650 SNV shareholders are buying every day as the stock becomes available, Trader Rick is right things are changing for this stock, weeding out the flippers, locking up the float and moving forward,with a real plan. Clayton will make this work for all shareholders no just a few. Right now its a PENNY STOCK, and in the penny stock world not a lot happens to benifit shareholders, but there is that gleamer of hope it will be big. Is this STOCK It? Time will tell!!!!
MONEYMADE, you are very funny,
You have no clue on what your talking about
when it come to Securenetviews viewing systems.
If you can get the same system from At&T for $199,
then you know what technology Securenetview uses.
What is It? For $199 you could not buy a needed Data
base to handle the kind of parent traffic that hits
the SNV web servers daily with verifying center codes,
user names, passwords,exct.Then you have the proprietary
technology in the video servers to handle thousands of
secure live video streams that go out to thousands of parents,
within minutes thousands of times daily. WOW all this for $199. Please give me the number so I can get in line. before you talk you should do some research.