InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 36
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/23/2008

Re: CaptainJim post# 69899

Wednesday, 01/27/2010 4:40:38 PM

Wednesday, January 27, 2010 4:40:38 PM

Post# of 141761
See Captain, you still have no clue on the value of the Technology that was given to UDHC and Clayton. Even today it is the best out there for the price it was offered at, but you like Clayton have no real idea about video image compression technology. Clayton and his so called tech team tried using wireless technology that was around when SNV's wired technology was created, Snv's technology was cheaper, the image compression refreash rates were better and there was on degragation when a 100 people look at the images at the same time. But if you would like to get into a video image commpression technology discussion, you might want to do a little researgh first.You will fine there has not been much in improvments in that area in the technology world, it's pretty much the same as it was back in 2000, wired technology is and always will be the best as for viewing clearity versus wireless, Kinderview is currently using wireless technology that was around in 2000 at a more expensive cost to the customer than SNV's technology would have been. Captian, when you design a video image compression technplogy and deployee it in a location or locations let me know, until then you might consider staying in your field of knowledge penny stocks.