Although he looks alone, somebody wants him on the phone.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yep, I got both my shots just as soon as I was eligible to get them.
Ahhhh, some sanity. Good to see you my man!
I'm sure admins are always looking for more to do. Cleaning up intros each time a mod resigns is probably a new duty they would welcome enthusiastically...
Thanks for that. A nice easy read...
No, the intros are only deleted when the last mod goes:
When a stock specific boards loses all Moderators, then the iBox will be deleted. When a new Mod is added, then they have the option to place their own content in the Intro or to restore previous versions of the iBox. This is accomplished by clicking on Manage/Edit iBox/iBox Version History/Select a Version (click on the date to preview)/Revert to This Version.
That might have been the initial spike down. But Kaplan is talking now, and he is probably one of the most aggressive of the FED governors. As long as he's talking, markets are going to get pushed down.
Ahhh, Robert Kaplan is about to come on CNBC. Maybe the markets think he'll say "taper".
What? Did Jay Powell just fart? What happened??
"Or janice shell" - That's her buddy Rosie's job!
There are several Rolling Stones references in that song. I just mentioned that because no one knows who John Hiatt even is unless they listen to XRT...
That song has gotten as much play as any Stones song yesterday and today. I gotta assume you listen to WXRT?
"and kill all the conspiracy posts."
Lol, that sounds like a lot of work!!
What Malone is saying is misleading - at best.
August 16, 2018: https://biontech.de/sites/default/files/2019-08/20180816_BioNTech-Signs-Collaboration-Agreement-with-Pfizer.pdf
April 9, 2020: https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-announce-further-details-collaboration
Pfizer and BioNTech's partnership in this field dates back to 2018 when they agreed to jointly develop an mRNA based vaccine for the flu. Then Covid came along.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/24/business/nightcap-onlyfans-comirnaty/index.html
Robert Malone has an ax to grind with "Big Pharma" as he thinks he should have the rights to mRNA vaccines, not them. So he's saying things that are easily twisted into misinformation by the likes of a Glenn Beck or Steve Bannon.
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/08/robert-malone-vaccine-inventor-vaccine-skeptic/619734/
Best ever explanation I've come across:
I guess you are referring to WebMD failing to mention non-existent treatments?
Again, looks like we better forward WebMD some Bitchute videos so they can be better informed...
Have you noticed what a cesspool of stupidity the Pfizer board has become?
https://investorshub.advfn.com/Pfizer-Inc-PFE-995/
Moderna board too, for that matter:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/Moderna-Inc-MRNA-36438/
"hardly any infection or deaths, so to have that containment the Chinese were using hydroxy"
You are bending statistics to fit your preconception. Logic tells us a person would have to be infected to be successfully treated with hydroxy (or any drug for that matter).
"Hardly any infection" would be due to prevention, not treatment. Prevention - as in China leading the world (again, by a fair margin) in percentage of population that has been vaccinated.
"I know all that."
Oh, OK, sorry. By your question that wasn't readily apparent at first:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165594095
"Could there possibly be a profit motive with the USA for such an inhumane policy?"
The profit motive angle, yeah that's a good one to explore.
Let's see what a company (Viatris) which produces human qualified hydroxychloroquine, and stands to profit from it's use, says about their own role in the fight against Covid:
https://newsroom.viatris.com/viatris-role-in-the-fight-against-covid-19
No treatment? Pneumonia can be and is actively treated. You are mistaking a pneumonia (inflammation) treatment for a Covid treatment. From that article I linked to:
The new coronavirus causes severe inflammation in your lungs. It damages the cells and tissue that line the air sacs in your lungs. These sacs are where the oxygen you breathe is processed and delivered to your blood. The damage causes tissue to break off and clog your lungs. The walls of the sacs can thicken, making it very hard for you to breathe.
China got rid of the Covid rapidly because they lead the world (by a fair margin) in percentage of population that have been vaccinated.
https://graphics.reuters.com/world-coronavirus-tracker-and-maps/countries-and-territories/china/
Note the date. Yesterday: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine
"will the people be confused and mixed up and take the Pfizer EUA jab thinking they are getting the real deal COMIRNATY?"
That is the Pfizer vaccine. The one that got FDA approval yesterday.
It's readily available and has been in use for quite some time now. Much to the chagrin of the anti-vax crowd...
Lol, sometimes it's just easy.
Did you actually read it? That is not a treatment for Covid-19. It's about a study regarding a treatment to mitigate Covid associated pneumonia.
I personally had a very good friend who spent some time in the hospital with pneumococcal (bacterial) pneumonia associated with Covid. The root cause of the pneumonia was the build up of fluid and damaged tissue from Covid. The pneumonia was treated with standard anti-biotics and he made a recovery. Due to his own experience, he would be among the first to tell you to go get the vaccine.
https://www.webmd.com/lung/covid-and-pneumonia#1
"It was improper to not continue the control" No, it would have been improper and unethical to continue the control.
Once again, those people volunteered to participate in those trials. You will not be able to find in any outline regarding the proper, ethical conduct of clinical trials in which it would be proper to segregate into perpetuity the control group once that trial's purpose has been accomplished.
Fortunately, Dr. Mengele wasn't running that particular show.
The study was done. Efficacy had been proven. The FDA granted emergency use authorization. It was proper and ethical to release the control group and allow them to choose whether to get the vaccine or not.
But a control group does remain in place. There is a segment of the population against which continued efficacy for the vaccinated population can be compared. If one is sitting at the table, looks around and can't pick out the sucker...
Yeah, Trump told the rally in Alabama the other night to "get the vaccine".
Now that Trump supporters know he is actually being controlled by Gates and Soros, that's got to upset their little Q-niverse a bit?
There are no "dumpsters". There was not any data "dumped".
The trials were ended once the efficacy of the vaccine being tested was shown. The participants who had received the placebo were given the choice to get the real vaccine. The smart ones got it.
This is the article which is twisted around by the "Conservative Treehouse" to say something it does not actually say: https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/02/19/969143015/long-term-studies-of-covid-19-vaccines-hurt-by-placebo-recipients-getting-immuni
Continued assignment of subjects to placebo is unethical once there is good evidence to support the efficacy of the trial therapy.
There is an ethical consideration beyond the pure science. These people volunteered to participate in clinical trials very early in the process of introducing the vaccines.
To deny the vaccine to the placebo control group just because they had been randomly selected to receive a placebo, and even keeping them in the dark regarding the fact that they had received a placebo, once those initial trials had been completed would have been morally bankrupt from an ethical perspective.
Besides there is a "control group" in place at this point anyway, making placebo administration unnecessary in the ongoing study of the progression of Covid.
Recommended reading: "Arrowsmith" by Sinclair Lewis. While fiction, it deals head on with the moral conflict involved when prioritizing science for science sake over ethical considerations.
"Mayo claim that hydroxy was ineffective based on no data"
It's pretty simple: They said they had no data that hydroxy is effective.
That's why I suggested forwarding bitchute videos to the Mayo Clinic - Because then they would have such data.
That article is a classic piece of prevarication. If one actually reads the article referred to, the placebo group was offered the real vaccine after the FDA granted emergency approval. That means they did indeed "lose" the control group in a study regarding the efficacy of the vaccine, but they "lost" it after the study had already proven the efficacy of the vaccine.
That's like me running a math problem out on a piece of paper, and coming up with the a solution. If I was to then run the piece of paper through the shredder, that doesn't mean the solution to my math problem becomes a falsehood.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/02/19/969143015/long-term-studies-of-covid-19-vaccines-hurt-by-placebo-recipients-getting-immuni
So the Mayo Clinic is relying on data from a "criminal health racketeering enterprise"?
Wow, maybe we should forward some bitchute videos to Mayo - ya know, give Mayo some real information to work with?
"They are mass produced by the big pharma that you despise and they don't even want their own drugs pushed to treat the virus."
That is exactly the most telling thing of all. If "Big Pharma" were criminal enterprises, it would only make sense they tout the effectiveness of quack treatments. Instead they tell the public it is not effective!
https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statement-on-ivermectin-use-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/
Hydroxy showed some initial indications as a possible treatment. But ultimately the data proved that to be false.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/expert-answers/coronavirus-drugs/faq-20485627&ved=2ahUKEwi4gbbc_8TyAhWJW80KHTxXCjsQFnoECBcQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0wh05Cn1DOBLeSipEmrHoI
Data from the mRNA trials has been extensively peer reviewed:
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://scholar.google.com/scholar%3Fq%3Dmrna%2Btrials%2Bpeer%2Breviewed%2Barticles%26hl%3Den%26as_sdt%3D0%26as_vis%3D1%26oi%3Dscholart&ved=2ahUKEwjahMWZ_sTyAhVUHs0KHRzFCN4QgQN6BAgDEAE&usg=AOvVaw20vd-516IZImXjXUkCM7zw