Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
lol... I've heard of that one. It sounds somewhat more amusing than many.
Back a million years ago, maybe 20, there was a British TV show in which (real) unemployed people were very briefly trained to do jobs they'd never done before, and then entered in a competition to do those jobs. It was a pretty amazing show. The episode that sticks in my mind was when they took a young man on the dole and trained him to be a professional polo player.
He'd never sat a horse, and was afraid of them. Never mind! Two weeks later, he was riding like a pro. Applied for a position with a team. The team owners were told that one of the three applicants for the job was a rank amateur. While the kid didn't win, he did come in second. Which I think was pretty extraordinary. I wonder what happened to him in the end, though.
A US cable channel picked up the show, but ruined it. As seems always to be the case here, they felt the need to introduce (minor) celebrity contestants. It wasn't worth watching.
Those are all great titles that I would enjoy. I would only enjoy being a PR Crisis Manger if no one new I was "the" PR Crisis manager for said crisis...lol.
We have all of our customers on Microsoft's email platform.
Prior to multi-factor-authentication once in a while a customer's employee would fall for a phishing email. They click on a link that looks like the Microsoft login page. They type in their password and...that info is in the hands of criminals.
Then the criminals will monitor the employee's email and figure out how to monetize access to the account. If it's someone with accounts receivable responsibilities they will send emails to company customers directing them to make the payments to a "new bank account." That account belongs to the criminals, of course...probably with some money mule who actually accepts the money and then passes most of it to the miscreants.
We had one customer that refused to allow us to enabled MFA for their email. We canceled our contract with that customer. One of their employees is a friend. She told me that a month or two after we stopped supporting the company the scenario above happened. A customer got an email directing them to wire money to pay an open invoice. Of course the company never got the money.
$ 197,000. In the wind somewhere.
lol...holy shit...slow is right. Or something else I presume..lol.
A couple of weeks ago I mentioned a Podcast called 'What it's like to be."
IMO some of the more compelling episodes:
* Stadium beer vendor
* FBI Special Agent
* Forensic Accountant
* Turnaround Consultant
* PR Crisis Manager
As you noted, they run around 20 minutes so even the ones that I don't particularly care for aren't a slog.
Most of the reports are this :
That's interesting. I guess, then, that we'll have to wait and see what happens.
I just don't follow them that much.
Today's Hindenburg report on Roblox didn't do much because the allegations contained in the report are old hat and already known. Several media stories state that these allegations have been made by a number of other short sellers previously, and there is little to nothing new in the Hindenburg report.
So why is Hindenburg publishing this story now? I don't know, but I wonder if they have some insight on timing that others don't that can potentially move the market downward. Their connections are very good, and their stories tend to be quite timely. I wouldn't bet against them knowing something important that is likely to move the market that others don't yet know.
Well... I hope he wasn't...
Oh my. You may want to check for malware...
Ahhhh. That will be interesting. Tons of articles about it today. Here's the complaint:
https://crypto.com/document/complaint.pdf
See this article as well; it's the source for the complaint:
https://www.ccn.com/news/crypto/crypto-com-sues-sec/
A part of the RBLX allegations are the way it opens it up for PEDOs and I can certainly see that. MY kid was on it all the time when it first started no idea if he was talking to another 14 year old or a creepy old pedo
OMG I came across a DIDDY instagram video last night. 6 hours later I emerged. WOW I am so out of touch during golf season LOL
Crypto.com sues US SEC after receiving legal threat from regulator
https://www.reuters.com/legal/cryptocom-sues-us-sec-after-receiving-legal-threat-regulator-2024-10-08/
..
.
lol, I don't know. But lately, they haven't been making the impact they once did.
Geez, is Hindenburg becoming just another bit of the market's routine background noise? How's a shorty s'posed to make a buck these days?! Jumping Jehoshaphat! ☹️
And on another subject, Hindenburg has a new report out, on Roblox (RBLX). I haven't read it yet, but it doesn't seem to have had much of an effect on the stock today:
https://hindenburgresearch.com/roblox/
That's interesting. And I have to say I agree with most of this:
Just ask him about crypto. He told MM that if he had been chair in the last few years, there would be tailored rules on the books already, as the industry has long been seeking, offering “a path forward for at least a baseline registration system” for crypto exchanges and brokers. And even then, Gallagher believes there would still need to be legislation.
I think Hester Peirce is right when she says crypto shouldn't be regulated through enforcement actions. It does need rules to follow, rules that are clear and will allow crypto ventures to develop without suddenly finding themselves the targets of SEC investigations. I find it extraordinary that crypto's been around as long as it has without something being done about that.
Alas, I fear Hester isn't a likely pick. She WOULD be fun...
God. It's so annoying. The Microsoft stuff--mail, the Office suite--now wants multiple factor authorization. Every once in a while, I get a threatening message saying I need to give them a "recovery" phone number or I might find myself denied access. I have nothing against that, but when I try to acquiesce with that demand, they say they already have that phone number, and need another. Sorry, I only have one phone number.
And of course that demand could be some kind of unauthorized trap, I suppose.
Politics aside, this is an interesting article from Politico speculating who may be the next SEC Chairman if Trump wins. All the names are definitely pro-crypto, but in no way advocate for unfettered crypto trading. I think each one differs from Gensler in their approach by supporting new crypto-specific regulations be adopted by Congress and the Commission rather than the current approach by Gensler to utilize all existing laws and regulations to regulate crypto.
The crypto executive who could soon be running the SEC
https://www.politico.com/newsletters/morning-money/2024/10/07/the-crypto-executive-who-could-soon-be-running-the-sec-00182663
Wall Street’s top cop is headed for a clash with the trendy online brokerage firm Robinhood.
The regulator could be picking a fight with its next boss, too.
Robinhood Chief Legal Officer Dan Gallagher is emerging as a leading contender to head the Securities and Exchange Commission should Donald Trump win back the presidency, according to a dozen former top regulators, lobbyists and securities lawyers.
“He’d be a natural choice,” one former senior SEC official told MM.
But Gallagher — a onetime SEC commissioner who is known for his affability and political chops — may find himself sparring with the agency first.
The SEC is weighing a lawsuit over Robinhood’s swelling cryptocurrency business in a case that would mark the latest salvo in Chair Gary Gensler‘s crackdown on the $2 trillion market. The SEC is looking into whether Robinhood is operating an unregistered broker-dealer and clearing agency in the crypto markets. Charges are not guaranteed, but if the agency does sue, the resulting legal battle could thrust a new and awkward spotlight onto Gallagher — just as the race for the chairmanship heats up.
For his part, Gallagher has a message for the SEC: Don’t do it.
“It’s a dog of a case,” he told MM. Robinhood, Gallagher said, offers trading in a fraction of crypto tokens compared to others that have hundreds on their platforms. And the company doesn’t have any crypto lending or staking products, he said.
“We’ve been forgoing revenue for the company by not going hog wild listing coins, and I think that puts us in a very, very unique position,” Gallagher said. “Shooting at the good guys is a really bad policy.”
An SEC spokesperson declined to comment.
Eight years ago, a rotating cast of characters from the financial, corporate and legal worlds swung through Trump Tower as they sought to join the then-incoming president’s administration. Now, as evidenced by Gallagher’s brewing candidacy, the revolving door between government and industry appears primed to start spinning once again if Trump wins.
“This is the name of the game: Get the fox in the henhouse,” said Richard Painter, who served as chief ethics lawyer for President George W. Bush.
Other names floating around K Street as potential SEC chairs under Trump include former Commodity Futures Trading Commission Chair Chris Giancarlo, who is known online as “CryptoDad"; former SEC General Counsel Robert Stebbins, now a partner at the law firm Willkie Farr & Gallagher; and current SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce, who occupies a Republican seat on the agency’s five-person commission.
Yet Gallagher’s ascendancy to the chair has long been a matter of when, not if, for some Republicans.
“Dan would be great,” Rep. Bill Huizenga (R-Mich.) told our Jasper Goodman following a House Financial Services Hearing where Gallagher testified last month. “I’ve had a great relationship working with him, even when we disagreed on some stuff.”
“Ultimately, you want someone who’s thoughtful, experienced, and not just ideologically politically driven,” the Michigan Republican said. “That’s been, I think, the problem with Gensler.”
Gallagher as a commissioner blasted the package of rules enacted in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis. He called for a sweeping review of trading in the U.S. stock market and was early to raise concern about the SEC’s internal courts, which have since been declared unconstitutional in certain cases by the Supreme Court. He was also a regular on Capitol Hill, briefing lawmakers on the wonky area of securities law.
If Trump did pick Gallagher, the Robinhood executive could face a contentious confirmation process. Democrats have long been wary of industry officials taking over federal regulators, and Robinhood has attracted a fair amount of congressional scrutiny over the years. (Remember GameStop — the bizarre market phenomenon of 2021 when Robinhood had to cut investors off from buying more shares in the beleaguered video game retailer’s stock, drawing the ire of lawmakers across Capitol Hill?)
But Gallagher argues that was then. The company has since overhauled its compliance and risk-management programs, he said. And as for any revolving-door concerns, he says having experience both in and out of government is a good thing.
Whether Gallagher would want to leave Robinhood is unclear. He told MM that he loves his job and that it’s “an honor to have my name included in any discussion of who may be the next SEC chairman.”
Make no mistake, though, Gallagher has clear issues with the SEC’s direction. Just ask him about crypto. He told MM that if he had been chair in the last few years, there would be tailored rules on the books already, as the industry has long been seeking, offering “a path forward for at least a baseline registration system” for crypto exchanges and brokers. And even then, Gallagher believes there would still need to be legislation.
“I would have done things differently,” he said. “I’ve known Gary for a long time and have a lot of respect for Gary, but, on this one, I disagree with him.”
I enjoy Twitter, now called X. It's not what it was before Musk took over, but to a considerable extent the experience you have depends on who you follow. It's interesting, good for politics, and there're tons of nice animal photos and videos. I've never used Facebook. YouTube is good for music. Snapchat is good, I suppose, if you want to make sure your messages will disappear quickly. And you forgot Instagram, which you need if you want to be an Influencer. Oh, and there's Slack. I don't even know what it does; it seems mostly to be a work thing.
But nowadays, what's really important are podcasts. I suppose part of the reason for their popularity is that a great many people commute to and from work, and they want something to listen to, but not look at. Yeah, there's also Sirius XM, which has longer format shows. Most podcasts seem to be relatively brief; maybe 15 to 20 minutes. But I haven't listened to many. And of course there're audiobooks, but I hate being read to.
The TikTok videos aren't really blurred at the sides. It's just that most people there use Portrait rather than Landscape mode when making their videos.
Yahoo just started with an authorization feature to confirm who I am.
I should have included social media which I think is unsocial media. As a whole I see no redeeming qualities in FB anymore, Tictok, Snap chat, YT except for sports videos and I'm sure I missed a few.
Tic Tok is the most annoying since the videos are blurred out on both sides?
More anti-fraud measures from the SEC and Gary Gensler:
Today, the Commission approved amendments regarding login, password, and other account access protocols for filers and other registrants using the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval System, commonly known as EDGAR. I am pleased to support these amendments because they enhance EDGAR’s security and further improve filers’ access to the EDGAR system.
The public and the SEC long have benefitted from the EDGAR electronic filing system. Today, EDGAR is a rich and accessible library for investors and filers alike. Unlike streaming platforms and other subscription platforms, EDGAR is available to the public free of charge. I think it’s one of the great innovations of the SEC.
A lot has changed in the three decades since the Commission first required mandatory EDGAR filings in 1993.[1] EDGAR has lived through the rise of the internet, social media, and streaming content. We also have learned a great deal about data security and password protection in that time. To keep pace with ever-evolving markets, technology, and business models, we’ve updated EDGAR over the years. Our most recent meaningful update, though, to EDGAR login, password, and other account access protocols was more than a decade ago.
Today’s amendments are an important next step for EDGAR account access protocols. Under previous requirements, registrants had one login per company. This is like having a family passing around one shared login and password for a movie streaming app. You know where that can lead. That’s simply not the most secure system—for filers and the Commission alike—when it comes to information relating to financial disclosure. By contrast, today’s amendments further secure login protocols by requiring every person filing something into EDGAR to login with individual credentials and to use multi-factor authentication.
The SEC’s EDGAR Business Office will open to the public a beta version for filer testing and feedback, which will include a set of optional Application Programming Interfaces (APIs). These APIs will help enhance how filers, including registrants and their agents, can access EDGAR, retrieve information, and submit bulk filings. Such changes promote efficiency for both filers and the Commission.
The final amendments include a number of changes in response to commenters’ feedback. For instance, the grace period for filers to perform annual confirmation was extended from two weeks to three months. Filers will have six months to prepare for compliance, rather than one month as proposed. They will continue to have six months to enroll in EDGAR using the new login protocols, as considered in the proposal, but the final amendments build in an additional three-month period to enroll before making filings after the compliance date. After that point, filers that have not enrolled would need to submit a new Form ID to make filings.
Taken together, these amendments benefit the Commission, filers, and investors alike...
https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/speeches-statements/gensler-statement-edgar-next-092724