Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Actually Durango should be back tomorrow 2/25/2010 around 4pm est
No 10-for-1 applied to account, yet!
My view here, take it or leave it.
It is convenient for people to post slective timelines identifying selective events that occurred, not all. However, some on this board want to call those that raise those events bashers.
Why not allow people to express their concerns that may be legitimate?
IMO, the timeline posted recently does not reveal 'all' that happened. Only Megas knows and is only spoon feeding certain people to report his version of the 'truth', which is only partial truth which is a whole lie.
Remember Enron!
It's a secret only for the inner circle. Shhh. something tells me they may be reading emails on this board and passing info onto Megas in order to reward loyal 'fake' investors.
No more credible than the timeline offered by Masta. What basis do you have to determine credibility of the two posts? I think you can agree with me the timeline is incomplete and not telling the whole story. This is based on info posted by the former moderator of this board. Are you stating Art's credibility is in question?
Either you are too close to Megas to be unbiased or you know more than what you are letting on.
2late:
I do not see how one can get slander out of response to Mastaflash's post of an incomplete, biased, and selective timeline, IMO. In other words, there are people on this board that know more than what they are stating and trying to spoon feed impartial truth ,which IMO is a whole lie, to others on this board.
By the way, IMO, you qualify as one of the people who appear to know more about the timeline and events than what is being told . Hmmm?
IMO, as with op, there is enough information that discredits Mastaflash publishing of commentary on BCIT as Masta is too close to Megas to provide unbiased info regarding the state of affairs with BCIT.
Timeline provided by Masta is obviously selective and does not provide the whole story.
Someone on IHUB has conveniently deleted/and or removed any references to the situation posted by art2gecko that reference information regarding sytner's involvement with BCIT.
yes. til 2/25
Masta:
Where does Sytner interaction with Megas fit into the timeline? This is not the whole story.
Typical of Megasites not providing the 'whole' truth.
Who is responsible for changing CSTL to HHGI in ihub?
op:
IMO, Megas does not have a leg to stand on because of his inability to operate BCIT with 'fiduciary responsibility'. That is why he did not follow thru with the PR statement and file.
I would like to think I am wrong here, but the key ingredient for Megas to win is to be able to display to a jury that he acted responsibly in regards to the Pino/Pammy identity theft discovery.
If this is what you are referring to as a double-cross, I would suggest you rethink again.
You must be one of the insiders that have direct contact with Megas to make this statement. This would make you too close to Megas to be objective with any credibility with any statements you have to make on this board. You follow?
IMO, BCIT got what it deserved. If the CEO fails to comply with the basic pinciples as warned in previous emails to stay up-to-date with filings, then the company got what it asked for.
Yes I know the playing field is not level, but that does not give a CEO a right to try and game the gamers.
All is fair in love and war.
Freedomxxx:
I am keeping the faith also. However, God will not bless anything that is contrary to His character. IMO, Megas has not been completely truthful.
Yes DTCC was wrong first, but IMO, Megas delay of reporting the identity theft later than sooner has as much to do with the revocation of BCIT trading status as DTCC wrongs.
Two wrongs do not make a right, I believe you will agree with me here.
Keeping the faith and waiting on the truth to be told, whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God
Business Week reports "Green Investing Is Paying Off." Eco-friendly investments, from individual stocks to mutual funds and ETFs, outperformed the Dow and S&P 500 in the last year.
I had a similar stock a few years ago that did the same thing that went to the moon($9.00) in one day. Unfortunately I was working and by the time I got my sell order in, had to settle for $6.00. It was in satellite TV.
$9.00 was its high and never got there again.
I see the same thing happening here, but this one has momentum to last a lot longer, IMO. Green will last a long time, just need to be an early adopter of the technology and BGNN is in lline and in production now and for the future.
Give this one another month. Reason is due to tax time and people will be getting refunds and looking for a place to put $1,000 or $2,000. Also, financial institutions will be gearing up to look for a place to make large gains quickly.
You ain't seen nothing yet! To the moon Alice!
Throw on some lighter fluid.
The only hope left is that the DTCC did not use super glue.
beamer:
There are only two beings that know the truth behind BCIT: Megas and his Creator. Some day the truth will be exposed. Time 'is' a friend of mine.
All the questions you ask appear to be for Megas as he is the one with fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders. He isn't talking nor filing so the SEC can validate and verify the share structure of BCIT.
According to Arkait, Megas has no responsibility for the fake shareholders. IMO, Megas did accept responsibility for the fake shareholders once he made the reported deal with Pino for $2 million. Megas supposedly stated this was a mistake while also stating he was just joking. Which is it? You cannot have it both ways.
Megas wants to resolve it his way. DTCC/SEC is resolving it their way. Looks like DTCC and SEC are doing a good job against BCIT and the one with fiduciary responsibility.
You need to be balanced in your accusations, this is where you are wrong. Just because DTCC was initially wrong, so too was Megas in how he handled the discovery of what DTCC and Pino and Pammy did. However, two wrongs do not make make one wrong and the other right, just because the DTCC was first in commiting a wrong.
Eventually Pammy and Pino were convicted. We are now waiting on justice against the ones with 'fiduciary responsibility' for the failure of BCIT trading. Many are involved here.
That is why I have asked for a statement to be sure Attaway or any attorney used is not limited to who is pursued. The BCIT fund has the appearance of limiting the search of culprits behind this fiasco, bumbling, and abuse of the financial systems. I do not expect to get any response to this.
But definitely have received responses regarding the accusations of a few selective parties responsible. Why not ask questions of all parties responsible? I think they are afraid to know the whole truth.
I do not liken the scenario of overstock.com to BCIT at all. At least overstock had revenue. That does not limit Megas to the same opportunity to turn BCIT into a legitimate business, but the method's used by both company leaders are definitely different.
If Megas would have stood up to Pino(and reported him initially) like he has to DTCC and SEC after the fact, IMO, BCIT would not be in this mess.
Hmmm. Sounds like fiduciary responsibility to me. Megas has tried to handle things his way since the beginning and 5 years later BCIT is still no closer to trading.
The only threatening I have seen has been on this board from the Megasites that do not like people that happen to have a different opinion. I was not sued by the DTCC or SEC, but by Megas! Remember "I got to hurt you to help you". Ask yourself this question: What do you think would have happened if Pino would have paid Megas the $2 million they agreed to behind closed doors? That's right, Megas was just joking. IMO, Megas would have washed his hands of BCIT and shareholders and been gone long ago. As Arkait has already stated, Megas has no responsibility for the fake shareholders.
Why is Megas still around? Because he has fiduciary responsibility for BCIT, plain and simple.
If the fund is for the shareholders, then please state that the fund will direct the attorney to provide an opinion that considers all possibilities including Megas and put it in writing on the fund raising board. That is all I am asking for, then I will contribute.
Molson that is a stretch! This attitude is to be expected by people that have been drinking the BCIT cool aid and do not want to hold 'all' fiduciary responsible people involved with BCIT accountable.
But, this is like someone that supports Megas to try to squirm and canive a way to buy off people, similar to the current government administration. In other words, only reward people that agree with Megas.
As I have said before, birds of a feather flock together.
Interesting commentary.
Give you a little secret. Neil Armstrong is my Father-in-Laws 6th cousin.
looks like I missed the mark today. but in for the long haul.
Wisdom told me 2 years ago to pull money out of market before election. Saved a lot of money and ready to reap rewards from private investments. Took some other money and invested in IVOT/BGNN 18 months ago and gradual buy-ins over the 18 months. This is definitely a keeper especially since major buy-in(over 2 mil) % will become 1 year next month. IMO, we will close above .004 today. Look for strong close at end of day.
After 5:03.15 pm Eastern
Durango will be free tomorrow! Best to you!
Exciting times this week. Durango will be set free on Thursday.
IMO, if Megas did, this creates a conflict of interest. As the fund should be used to pursue all possibilities.
As no one stated that the fund will examine possibility of including Megas, as he has fiduciary responsibility of BCIT, I have not contributed to the fund until some states that considering Megas as a party to any complaint or legal action is on the table.
Janice:
IMO, it won't be Megas as he really doesn't want anybody to know what went on behind closed doors.
Don't need it, unless this is a threat. Hope you enjoy paying for it. Maybe you can borrow some money from Megas until this is settled to help you pay for it.
That's right, a man who has assets worth $60 million is broke and has no money, thus the fund to help Megas defend BCIT.
Maybe that is why I do not think this is on the level because the
Megasites running the fund do not want to consider including Megas. A real attorney would request to consider all options, not limit options.
Again, I never said that. Again you want to distort the truth. The problem is Megas had the fiduciary responsibility to report the identity theft upon discovery. From the information, this did not happen. Why is this so difficult to understand. IMO, none of you that support Megas have ever started a corporation before or refuse to accept this fact. Yes, again DTCC, SEC, and brokers were and are wrong. But this does not exempt Megas from his fiduciary responsibility.
The decision as reported he made was definitely a conflict of interest and not in the best interest of the company or real or fake shareholders, IMO.
Since you seem to be so wise oh OP one, please tell me how the decision he made to sell BCIT to PINO for $2 million was in the best interest of BCIT. I know, I know, he was only kidding. To the best of my knowledge, he still has not reported the $50,000(here you go 2late) he claimed to have received. This, IMO, is and was in the best interest of Megas - not BCIT. Until the DTCC, SEC, and now SFC stepped in to hold Megas accountable for filing.
My response must be worth waiting for if you are still here reading and waiting to respond to my posts and counting the time.
I guess I can say the same about you. If the shoe fits wear it.
You and Molson now Yoda are just riots. Fabricating all the untruths and calling others names and making lies about people. Sounds like you are one of the untruthful ones that cannot handle the truth. But that is what untruthful people do. To be expected, IMO.
there will come a day that the truth about BCIT and Megas will be exposed to the whole world. Keep your eyes open and don't blink because the truth travels at 186,000 miles per second and the darkness will be exposed.
Keep living in the past, don't want to come BACK. Typically people that look backwards run into lampposts or walls. As for me, I have the future to look forward to and it is looking great!
I will continue to look forward. My future is not dependent on Megas. One would have starved by now if they were.
Can't handle the truth, eh Joda? The truth will set BCIT free! And even you, but it is obvious at this time you cannot deal with the truth nor the Megasites on this board. I can understand why some people on this board do not want to deal with the truth. Primarily because they are not truthful with anyone much less themselves.
If the Megasites could they would be open to considering including Megas. But they are too emotionally involved. They have to fabricate untruths about people like Joda just did. It is hard to understand how people can be loyal to a person that has done nothing for them except call them fake shareholders, sue them, and then Arkait states that Megas has no responsibility for fake shareholders, and IMO, not even the real shareholders.
The truth will find you out!
You can take that to the bank!