InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 1203
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/13/2008

Re: op9171787 post# 129387

Monday, 01/25/2010 8:25:45 PM

Monday, January 25, 2010 8:25:45 PM

Post# of 159752
Again, I never said that. Again you want to distort the truth. The problem is Megas had the fiduciary responsibility to report the identity theft upon discovery. From the information, this did not happen. Why is this so difficult to understand. IMO, none of you that support Megas have ever started a corporation before or refuse to accept this fact. Yes, again DTCC, SEC, and brokers were and are wrong. But this does not exempt Megas from his fiduciary responsibility.

The decision as reported he made was definitely a conflict of interest and not in the best interest of the company or real or fake shareholders, IMO.

Since you seem to be so wise oh OP one, please tell me how the decision he made to sell BCIT to PINO for $2 million was in the best interest of BCIT. I know, I know, he was only kidding. To the best of my knowledge, he still has not reported the $50,000(here you go 2late) he claimed to have received. This, IMO, is and was in the best interest of Megas - not BCIT. Until the DTCC, SEC, and now SFC stepped in to hold Megas accountable for filing.

Time and the Creator of it are my friends

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.