News Focus
News Focus
icon url

gharma

11/19/12 2:58 PM

#47813 RE: Gatz #47808

Thanks for x-posting Hockmir's non-snide, effectively presented with humor, diagnosis of an incredulous statement.
The response seems to indicate an inability to intelligently respond to honest and pertinent questions.
icon url

Gatz

11/19/12 5:14 PM

#47822 RE: Gatz #47808

New comments added to previous post.

Wanderport Corporation:
We all know how a magnetron works but nobody really knew how to measure or pinpoint and maximize microwave energy in running water. David, For an armchair quarterback you may consider building one yourself then we'll also have the opportunity to laugh and comment on YOUR inept work.
about an hour ago

Jeff:
Amen Andrew
about an hour ago via mobile · Like..
icon url

Hockmir

11/19/12 10:32 PM

#47832 RE: Gatz #47808

Thanks for the update, Gatz. I suspect that they declined to answer any of the questions posed for the simple reason that they don't understand any of the technologies they claim to be working in.

Anyone who considers microwaves unpredictable should not be attempting to develop a device which uses them. Ionizing radiation is rather dangerous to be messing around with if you don't know what you're doing. Stating that they are unpredictable is all the indication I need about the technological competence to design a microwave based device. May I recommend a good introductory text on RF Engineering?

Electricity unpredictable? Would this be the AC source side of the electricity, which people have harnessed and used safely and effectively for more than a century? Or would this be the microwave side of the oven, in which case I recommend re-reading the previous paragraph.

Water unpredictable? I feel no need to comment further.