Key paragraph in Barron’s write-up on CLF (from your post):
There have been concerns about growth in China and other emerging markets of late, but as long as China's hunger for steel stays relatively on track, miners like Cliffs will enjoy high prices, as stretched capacity around the world keeps supplies of iron ore tight.
Although CLF is a significant producer of metallurgical coal required for steelmaking, iron ore is the major determinant of CLF’s fortunes, and the prospects are bright, IMO, despite the symbolic lowering of China’s GDP growth target from 8% to 7.5% (#msg-73088662).
See #msg-71869156 (Bloomberg re buyout vig) and #msg-71437978 (prior article in Barron’s) for related stories.
Discussion: ML’s new price target is $60 (down from the prior target of $84) based on ML’s expectation of 2013 EPS of $6.20. Note that CLF had 2011 EPS of $11.48 (#msg-72282856) and 1Q12 EPS of $2.63 (#msg-75223487), which is an annualized rate of more than $10.50 insofar as the first calendar quarter is seasonally CLF’s weakest period when Great Lakes ports are frozen.
In other words, ML is expecting a very sharp reduction in CLF’s 2013 EPS relative to 2011 and 2012 to date. Moreover, even if ML’s 2013 EPS forecast of $6.30 were to come true, the current share price of $50 is only 8x ML’s 2013 EPS forecast.
Let’s also bear in mind that CLF recently raised its dividend substantially (#msg-73237761, #msg-73261185) and that insiders have been buying shares on the open market (#msg-75995329). Thus, it’s reasonable to surmise that CLF’s insiders do not fully concur with ML’s view on the iron-ore market and the company’s business prospects.