Let's start over and get some terms straight first. First we have Ms. Mitchell starting to work for GRNO after the "SEC" documents were released in June 2010. I should have said the attorney left for incompetence for signing off on those documents. I shouldn't have said "accountant". And that is really just my opinion, I am not an SEC lawyer.
Secondly and thirdly, there is the accountant and accounting firm the accountant works for. That was Sherri Thorp of Amersey Investments, not registered with the Public Companies Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). This person and accounting firm had to be replaced with one registered with the PCAOB which they did last winter. They are now using the firm GBH and they were working with a person there to get the financials audited. But that person was the one who just left and has now been replaced by another accountant. Ms. Mitchell has made initial contact with that person to get that person going. To what extent that person must be gotten up to speed I have no idea, that might take 5 minutes. It shouldn't be necessary for that person to do all the work over again the previous accountant completed. Once something is audited, why keep doing the work over and over again? Just move on and complete the work that remains.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
