News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Sec 10

04/27/05 2:24 PM

#162162 RE: txredneckbud #162161

TX I see you are as intellectually challenged here as you are on RB.

It's quite simple. The only place a "naked short" can exist is at the NSCC. The NSCC records show only 400 billion plus shares owned in street name.

So if you assume that EVERY single street name share is a "naked short" the NSCC count is the max.

Now, moron, how likely is that?
icon url

hundred to one

04/27/05 2:33 PM

#162164 RE: txredneckbud #162161

That is "CONTROL DOUBLE THINK" works well for them...kaos
icon url

Euthydemus

04/27/05 2:36 PM

#162171 RE: txredneckbud #162161

txredneckbud - Here is what abadgoodgirl posted on RB...

I talked to TRANSFER AGENT. She didn't have time to RUN the reports but said PROXIES WOULD not need to be sent out if there is anything to vote on as the company owns greater than 51%.

FACT FACT FACT


http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKX&read=915512

Jeff at 1st Global told me today that conversation did not take place - which part is not clear?

"as far as abadgoodgirl lying? hmmm,,have no reason to believe that based on her past."

I suggest you recalibrate your gullibility sensor...lol.

Hint: Call him yourself - Jeff @ 702-656-4919.