Replies to post #4975 on DD Support Board and Research Team

[janice shell]

LOLOL!! That could happen.

What's even more interesting about that statement is that in his complain he states rather categorically that IHub pays people to post. A truly ridiculous contention that he'll never be able to prove.

So... Is he backing away from that?

Even more important: Everyone knows that paid promoters work all the financial message boards. Some disclose; most don't. No "paid basher" has ever been discovered.

But what on earth does any of that have to do with Eade? He's not a stock. He's not representing a public company in this action. Whatever he wants to think about paid posters, it's completely irrelevant to this litigation.

[janice shell]

Here are Eade's new pleadings:

02/21/2011 4 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for AN ORDER ALLOWING EXPEDITED DISCOVERY RE DOE DEFENDANTS filed by plaintiff Kenneth Eade. Motion set for hearing on 3/15/2011 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Eade, Kenneth) (Entered: 02/21/2011)

Doc 4 PDF file
http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/rAPcdg

Doc 4-1 PDF file
http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/cBbbdA

Document Number: 4 6 pages 90 kb

Attachment Description
1 Proposed Order 1 page 11 kb