What's even more interesting about that statement is that in his complain he states rather categorically that IHub pays people to post. A truly ridiculous contention that he'll never be able to prove.
So... Is he backing away from that?
Even more important: Everyone knows that paid promoters work all the financial message boards. Some disclose; most don't. No "paid basher" has ever been discovered.
But what on earth does any of that have to do with Eade? He's not a stock. He's not representing a public company in this action. Whatever he wants to think about paid posters, it's completely irrelevant to this litigation.