No investor should have to talk to the CEO to get good information about a public company. The CEO can't even provide non-public information to anyone. How objective do you really think a CEO, who has a fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders, would be?
When evaluating investments, IMHO, results are always the most important factor. You may want to consider plans, hopes, etc. but how the company has done in the past often indicates how well it will do in the future. In addition, if a company has a weak balance sheet, as IMHO PNTV does, it's going to be hard to become profitable, even with a good idea. Ideas still take money to implement.