William -
Your scenario all sounds quite plausible, except I believe that the preferred back dividends, if paid, will be paid out of the goodness of someone's heart. Neither the P or the K dividends are cumulative. This means that they do not accumulate (accrue) or in other words there are no legally binding dividends in arrears. Of course that would just mean more for the commons per share.
Now the examiner or THJMW may decide that the preferred dividends had been paid prior to the seizure, and thus, since the seizure was unwarranted, the dividends would have otherwise continued, -- and use that as a justification for paying all of the dividends missed. But I do not believe that any legal obligation to pay dividends in arrears to preferred shareholders exists.
Otherwise, it all sounds reasonable and not at all far fetched. How fast can we make this happen?
GLTall
DrDebit