Replies to post #21495 on Grapefruit USA Inc (GPFT)

[Boxsterfan]

Two comments:

1. Dean SPECIFICALLY says in Video Part 1 at http://forums.imaging3.com that the rotating hand is 2D. He says this near the end of the 2D rotating hand demo as he transitions to the 3D skull demo.

2. I think that Dean showing investors the "real time 3D" in action as many are requesting is a great idea. Besides general investor confidence, the following scenarios are benefits:

* - Stock price likely to go up (I would say a minimum of to $1/share). Sure, this is not guaranteed, but if the device does what it claims to do...this would only be logical. This has the benefit of helping the company fund operations. They sold 107M shares last fall to help fund operations netting $2.5M. The company could dilute by a measly 10M shares more and get 4x the cash to fund the company at $1/share. Dean says he has credit facilities lined up to keep the company running through 2010 and 2011, but if you can claim that not having a significant cash cushion is beneficial then we surely just disagree.

* - (A little more out there...but certainly plausible) A foreign company sees the technology for the first time. Maybe it is a foreign company that no one has thought about. They like it so much and believe in it so much they offer IMGG a buyout at $8/share before FDA approval (maybe they will take it through approval in their own country.) I think someone would come into IMGG's office with an AK-47 if dean turned down $8/share today.

There are probable more scenarios.

[gdsgds]

The Skull was prerecorded object not live image and it was a lousy image at best. Read the name of the company: INSTANT 3D IMAGING. I am going to keep it simple. The red flags are the doubts have multiplied in the last few months, the burden of proof is on Dean.Great investors from this site have turned on this product and you damn well know who they are. At this point i will be satisfied if he goes under oath stating that he has such a machine in working condition as stated, that won't affect the FDA or no one can find out his so called secrets. Hell, he won't respond to investors questions anymore..BTW, i have ocean front property in AZ I want to sell ya, but you can' t see it thus...

[eagleagain2002]

One other thing about not allowing anyone to see the machine for security purposes...while the technology may be patent protected it is very expensive to fight a legal battle over patent infringement. Much better to keep the technology under wraps rather than risk patent infringement. there are many cases in American business where a company will not patent a product just to keep the technology a secret.