Replies to post #9786 on IDO Security, Inc. (fka IDOI)

[goldrusher]

MR. GOLDBERG......Knowing that you read the HUB message boards,
a bit of unsolicited advice.


If you want to be believeable to your shareholders, it is
imperitive that you distance yourself from usury rate financiers and from seeking advice from scamsters. May I
suggest that if you have a valuable product that is needed
in quantity, you let the product determine the direction of
the SP and impress legit bankers and venture capitalists and set about immediately to take down the red flags.
The removal of Ray Willenberg from the IDOI board would be
a huge step in that direction. A high level officer from
a security related firm like Brinks would bring credibility
to the directorship, but a failure scamster can only hurt
IDOI in the long run. Many shareholders are putting trust in
your leadership. It is time to show you are worthy of that
trust, IMO.

cheers

PS Guinness is good for you

[hokiecuz]

I agree with you Gold on some points but not all. The one that stands out to me is the...

"Mr. Willenberg was recommended to us ...and after speaking with him..."

Huh? I can't find where this was stated, but weren't they both on the BOD of Rim? He makes it sound like he didn't know of Ray until he was recommended to IDO.

The main thing to keep in mind though is, that up to this point there is nothing to say the Goldgerg isn't running a legit company and until such info comes forward I am going to take him at his word. I know of several companies that have very questionable people in management, but it doesn't necessarily mean that the company itself is bad.

[neophyte184]

Gold,

I know where you stand on this issue as you weighed in on this email from Goldberg the last time I posted it. But I comprehend the opportunistic response.

I believe that last section where Goldberg talked about every PR being accurate...he was referring to the PR's from IDO, not Rim.

Enjoy the day!

Neo

[tommy 9 fingers]

Hey Goldrusher,

Good morning to you.

Question about one of your statements?

You said:
"Every press release issued by this company have been accurate
to a fault". Give me a break, Goldberg!! You know better
than that! Start with the Lucent test, Add the Maine test
that never happened, add the Milan meeting which was a huge
stack of lies, and maybe even toss in the one with the
photoshopped logo on another companies product. Sorry, Mr.
Goldberg, but you are rapidly moving into the same liar
category as are Ray and Brad.

The question?

Is this statement in reference to RSMI or IDO. IF I recall you made this statement in refernce to RSMI in past posts. Now it appears that you attributing to Mr. Goldberg. I thought the tests you speack of and the photoshop logo on another product was Ray at RSMI.

I thought the above statement attributed to Mr. Goldberg was in regards to IDO press releases, not Rays press releases about RSMI. Sounds like you are mixing the two here. If so, Again why I prefer that the focus is on facts about IDO, and facts about what Ray does at IDO not what he did at RSMI. This again could give new invest the wrong impression about IDO.

I am confused could you clear that up for me?

Thanks