Sorry, Neo, but I can't let that one stand as legit.
Mr. Goldberg says, "Mr. Willenberg was recommended by some of
our largest investors". You might ask him if he is speaking
of the likes of Isaac Winehouse in this case.
You might also ask Mr. Goldberg if he heed that terrific
advice before or after he had been made a director on Ray's
RSMI board. If afterwards, it would seem strange or devious
to claim the mutual backscratching came as a result of some
usury rate financiers.
"I found him to be knowledgeable about financing" and yet
he cannot produce his million dollar supposed order due to
a lack of corporate funds. Now that is truly funny!!
"Have a sound business philosophy" Again, a huge laugh. Ray
ran his company from $31 per share to .0001, got locked out
of his corporate office for non-payment of rent, lost his staff
for non-payment of wages, but he has a sound business philosophy??? LOL
RSMI was offered VC monies. Ray turned it down. Why???
Because to get the funds, he had to show the VC proof of
product which supposedly they had already submitted to Lucent.
So, rather than admit that there was no product, Ray declined
the funds giving a lame excuse of something like opening up
his secrets to competitors. (Another red flag when you hear
that one).
"Every press release issued by this company have been accurate
to a fault". Give me a break, Goldberg!! You know better
than that! Start with the Lucent test, Add the Maine test
that never happened, add the Milan meeting which was a huge
stack of lies, and maybe even toss in the one with the
photoshopped logo on another companies product. Sorry, Mr.
Goldberg, but you are rapidly moving into the same liar
category as are Ray and Brad.
cheers
PS Guinness is good for you
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
