And the fact that Kim chimed in at the 7/23 hearing beginning on page 57, line 9, with, "You have $25,000 a month coming in, and it costs $150,000 to $200,000 per quarter in trust expenses- so you are running a negative to the Unitholders".
Why would he support the Raindl lowball affidavit when his client mosh holding, lp owns 10.2% of the total trust units, knowing that his client'a final maximum distribution amount from that proposed auction depended on a marketing strategy that encouraged higher bids. Could his client have a surrogate(s) in the woodwork also?
Even the plaintiffs trying this lowball nonsense, a bunch of ....
ican
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
