News Focus
News Focus
Followers 2
Posts 1419
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/06/2007

Re: GO MOSH post# 24334

Wednesday, 08/26/2009 11:43:11 AM

Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:43:11 AM

Post# of 27567
And the fact that Kim chimed in at the 7/23 hearing beginning on page 57, line 9, with, "You have $25,000 a month coming in, and it costs $150,000 to $200,000 per quarter in trust expenses- so you are running a negative to the Unitholders".

Why would he support the Raindl lowball affidavit when his client mosh holding, lp owns 10.2% of the total trust units, knowing that his client'a final maximum distribution amount from that proposed auction depended on a marketing strategy that encouraged higher bids. Could his client have a surrogate(s) in the woodwork also?

Even the plaintiffs trying this lowball nonsense, a bunch of ....

ican

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today