P2K -
Is that true... that you were trying to shake down the new board ?
LOL !!! That is too funny. Unbelievable. When you think things here can get no more strange...
Just out of curiosity, what sort of $ were you expecting to shake out of the till to pay yourself, in return for the benefit of sharing your unique understanding, obvious brilliance and unparalleled ability with us ?
Mostly, what I note from this ridiculous brouhaha, is that it makes it clear enough that DHWCO properly dodged a bullet, making the obviously right choice, in spite of your threats, and no doubt because of your obvious misbehavior.
Having this new bit of information on the context and about what it is that is driving your "opinion" and focus here, now, makes it pretty obvious. It seems you aren't different than prior board members, who were all there also trying to TAKE SHAREHOLDERS $ from the company ? That you were clueless enough about that to make your demands of $ from the new board, while also posturing to try to join the board, is just stunning.
The most obvious thing I see in this, highlighting something of a clear difference between past history and now... is that in the past if potential directors were posturing to take the shareholders $ rather than contribute value in effort, that was seen as a clear indication of qualification, and now it seems that it is not.
I guess that knowing the history, and the present situation, and still walking in with your hand held out while making those sorts of demands of the new board... probably wasn't a brilliant negotiating strategy. Perhaps the obviousness of that should also inform our consideration of the wisdom of allowing you anywhere near a negotiation on our behalf ? If you can't negotiate for yourself without creating these sorts of problems and disruptions, and without throwing temper tantrums, and without shifting to trying to hurt the company when you fail in gaining a benefit for yourself ?
I obviously don't think you should be allowed anywhere near any point where you would have influence on making any decision, or representing the company in any capacity.
Maybe you should contact T-Mobile. I'm sure they need and will pay for brilliant turncoat experts who can help them try to obfuscate the facts with formal but erroneous expositions of logic, and then distract from the point of failure in the argument with emotional rants. It seems you are well qualified for that. Who knows ? They might be willing to pay you to continue generating the sort of noise you have here recently... and, since it is about the paycheck... you shouldn't have any issues with stabbing shareholders in the back for pay, given it seems you are doing that now and doing it for free ?
In truth, I don't think that will work out either... unless DHWCO is willing to cut in again once in a while to explain to us what it is you are going on about...
Given the history, I don't generally expect it will be useful to have set overly high expectations here... but, even given the context, I'm disappointed in you.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
