Replies to post #33753 on Calypso Wireless (fka CLYW)

[dr foo]

Dave,

I want to publicly apologize to you, the other BODs, and to the CEO if my last post on this worthless board offended you. My intent was meant to let you know that most of us who read the ramblings of P2K believe they are just that, ramblings. I'm not trying to speak for everyone but I myself would like for the "caretakers" of my investment to be focused on CLYW business and not what gets written on a chat board, whether it's positive or negative chat.

I still can't believe that you would actually resign from your post due to writings on this board, that truly does amaze me. This board IS NOT that serious. That's all my last post was meant to say. Again, there is nothing posted on this board that can help you do your job better or worse.

JMHO

[plaintif2000]

i agree

[downsideup]

I have to agree with you on that.

While I do appreciate the inputs that clarify for me what it is that has been going on, making obvious that which wasn't at all clear before, I can't comprehend that there is any value in doing anything other than putting this to rest with "No. It ain't going to happen" and then moving on.

P2K is going to have to deal with his issues on his own, and the board shouldn't be distracted from what they need to be focused on and doing by getting wrapped up in dealing with his rants.

I suppose I'll accept on the face of it that the inputs likely wouldn't have been made if there wasn't in fact some sort of damage being done, beyond the level of a nuisance, that made the effort to address it useful...

I still will find it an issue if that sort of pointless "rabble rousing" by one clearly self interested, disgruntled, and off kilter individual is allowed to knock the effort being made by others off center. I see it could be a distraction. I see it could be annoying. But, I don't accept on the face of it... at least in terms of what P2K has presented for us to see here... that he is likely to have much impact, or any significant influence on anyone.

I'll agree with DHWCO that I'm not thinking P2K should be "moderating" a board when he is clearly using it to prosecute the agenda he is, and is clearly close enough to the situation that he is using the board to bolster his "opinion" with selective release of inside information. I don't know if IHub has a formal policy on boards being moderated by company insiders... but, it seems obvious enough to me that could create "issues" ?