Replies to post #62820 on Effective Control Transport Inc. (fka EFFC)

[hermon munster]

everyone knows that once you past 51% you round up to 100%
Duh!

;-)

But seriously if you are right 71% of the time and you are constantly taking measurements... your final conclusion will be right (especially if the past data is being compared to the new data)... the operator needs to rest... and you know this about 1 hr in advance...

[doogdilinger]

Unless & until it's EVER INDEPENDENTLY studied over a lengthy period of time ie: white paper...the inhouse testing which as you so aptly point out had a high rejection rate is irrelevant...because NO LEGITIMATE entity is ever going to take the CRAM seriously without this company first being able to prove it works & is a marketable commodity!!!

And the question then becomes why is EFFC still touting supposed inhouse tests instead of getting out there & initiating an independent white paper study???

That's why it's important that individuals do their own due & contact co.'s like Robert who were involved with a pilot test of the CRAM but are suddenly silent now with no more Claude Robert touts appearing anywhere...hmmmmmmmmm...I wonder why???

I mean you'd think one long here could post what Robert thought of the pilot program results...but nope...nobody here wants to post the truth of where that slippery slope pilot program ended up do they...& the reason is simple...it's over & it was a miserable failure which is exactly why Claude Robert is no longer touting the CRAM nor signing any revenue generating contract with EFFC lol;)

[rosebud05]

Max, read this post again.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=36811253

Please don't bother me anymore.