News Focus
News Focus
Followers 3166
Posts 209954
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 02/04/2004

Re: yenorapotucalo post# 62820

Friday, 05/08/2009 3:03:13 PM

Friday, May 08, 2009 3:03:13 PM

Post# of 72325
Unless & until it's EVER INDEPENDENTLY studied over a lengthy period of time ie: white paper...the inhouse testing which as you so aptly point out had a high rejection rate is irrelevant...because NO LEGITIMATE entity is ever going to take the CRAM seriously without this company first being able to prove it works & is a marketable commodity!!!

And the question then becomes why is EFFC still touting supposed inhouse tests instead of getting out there & initiating an independent white paper study???

That's why it's important that individuals do their own due & contact co.'s like Robert who were involved with a pilot test of the CRAM but are suddenly silent now with no more Claude Robert touts appearing anywhere...hmmmmmmmmm...I wonder why???

I mean you'd think one long here could post what Robert thought of the pilot program results...but nope...nobody here wants to post the truth of where that slippery slope pilot program ended up do they...& the reason is simple...it's over & it was a miserable failure which is exactly why Claude Robert is no longer touting the CRAM nor signing any revenue generating contract with EFFC lol;)

"Never buy or sell based on anything I post - my posts are just my opinion"

"I like ridin' lightnin' - rely on no-ones due but your own"

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today