News Focus
News Focus
Followers 1
Posts 578
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/07/2007

Re: rosebud05 post# 62815

Friday, 05/08/2009 2:53:35 PM

Friday, May 08, 2009 2:53:35 PM

Post# of 72325
OK

5 out of 14 samples were rejected for technical problem (that is the CRAM wasn't working) not 6 out of 15. Not much of a difference as 9 samples were valid anyway.

But according to their own "presented paper":

Accuracy - the probability of the CRAM reporting the true state of the driver in any 15 sec window - ranged from 0.69 to 0,72 with a mean of 0,71.(SD 0,008)

You said 100% accuracy, I said 70%. Who's the one not getting it? Sigh ...

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today