News Focus
News Focus
icon url

not_til_2005

08/09/04 1:32 PM

#49860 RE: barge #49859

barge, NEC permitted a prototype pc, imo ... you actually think NEC sought out Wave?... and if so, why isn't NEC shipping boces w/Intel's Wave-enabled mobos?!





icon url

dig space

08/09/04 1:50 PM

#49863 RE: barge #49859

barge, no /e
icon url

dig space

08/09/04 2:06 PM

#49867 RE: barge #49859

barge, I was not bashing

I said your message was out of step with reality.

Compare Waves statements about the Wavemeter (in my recent post to not until) with ITRU's statements about their DRM portfolio and the degree with which their extensive and well defended portfolio enables client side consumption of digital content.

Look at the dates on the ITRU patents. Seriously, slow down and look at the Shear patents. Read them. Google "real time clock" heck, TOS in DRM on the search. See what you get and what you don't get. You will get Michener and Sprague and TTN I imagine ... and a whole lot more.

You really think that that flimsy TTN/WAVX patent can hold the fort against the plethora of SONY-PHILLIPS-MSFT patents running against it. I think otherwise. Sure, there is a niche for the PeterMeter, and it AIN'T Janus.

Janus is ITRU+The"Palladium Patent". Not a speck of Wave.

Your jest towards equivocating the KidCard/NEC/Zaptronics debacle into the MSFT/SONY/Phillips/ITRU/Janus Tour de force is indicative of a lack of objectivity IMHO.

Your Friend,

Dig Space.