News Focus
News Focus
icon url

clarity789

12/19/07 11:55 AM

#95277 RE: betolluvioso #95275

Wow... I don't really want to touch that one... but yes, the previous shareholder meetings where Megas gave himself the preferred could now be questioned as to legitimacy.

Given the Megas propensity to litigate, I'm not certain that anyone would do that....

icon url

bobbybdb

12/19/07 12:03 PM

#95281 RE: betolluvioso #95275

betolluvioso,I will be totally shocked, if we ever see a proxy to vote on a R/S. I do not believe that will ever get put in the hands of the shareholders.

If they do a R/S it will read, that the BOD and shareholders approved, however I'll bet we never get a chance to vote on it.
icon url

camper9

12/19/07 2:09 PM

#95311 RE: betolluvioso #95275

You presume to know the real reason behind Megas' covering of the counterfeit shares. You assertion is not a fact, but nothing more than an unsubstantiated opinion.


      ¶ Megas has now admitted that no counterfeit shares existed, because he covered them. Given this fact,...