Replies to post #95245 on Bancorp International Group Inc (fka BCIT)

[clarity789]

No - never was. The wording was specific - invalidly issued shares.

Shareholder lawsuit, same thing. All the 10Q's and 10K's same thing.

No one was ever charged with counterfeiting. Thats just been the pump here for 2 years, and it blinded everybody. And it still does.

You can't really believe the DTC/SEC/NASDAQ would force a company to cover counterfeits...

Whether valid or invalid... it is BCIT that issued the shares. And it is BCIT that must cover them.

[clarity789]

mainuh - in the past 2 years the fiercest battles occured over just that issue... and now it is finally coming home...

Some posters (including me) insisted that this board was living in a fantasyworld of counterfeiting, evil shorts, and secret agendas... that the government agencies and watchdogs were corrupt and screwing over the little guy.

And now the truth is undeniable.

There was no counterfeiting, merely invalid share issues. Over 750 million of them.

There were no evil shorts. The only proven short was Darbie on behalf of making a market for BCIT, and Megas covered their 25 million shorts

The SEC/DTC/NASD were not corrupt and screwing the little guy... they were enforcing the law. Invalidly issued shares must be covered by the company.

Here we are... the company is covering the invalidly issued shares.

Kinda destroys the faireytales and myths... and there is little left to argue about.