News Focus
News Focus
icon url

bobbybdb

12/19/07 9:11 AM

#95247 RE: clarity789 #95246

clarity,So you are saying, that Megas spent all that time and money suing us, trying to find the counterfeit shares and all the time he knew that there were none, because he is the one that issued shares.(You make my head hurt.) that makes no sense!!!!
icon url

mainuh

12/19/07 9:15 AM

#95248 RE: clarity789 #95246

whatever, in the beginning
Pino/Thompson/Carter counterfeited certs, and I for one don't see why the company should have to cover ANY of them, period, nor would I ever support the actions of those individuals that counterfeited those certs.
There's specific laws that deal with oversold conditions that have been suspended, which is illegal imo.
I can't believe the DTC/SEC/NASD would force a company to cover counterfeit certs either, but that sure seems to be what is happening, which is extortion, in my opinion.
All imo~

icon url

allezlOM

12/19/07 9:20 AM

#95249 RE: clarity789 #95246

Clarity: speaking word specific, read again what NASD wrote two years ago..."counterfeit"!
http://www.finra.org/web/groups/rules_regs/documents/notice_to_members/p015019.pdf