Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,519.12
(
0.61%
)
US TECH 100
29,317.60
(
0.36%
)
Dow Jones
50,461.68
(
-0.23%
)
Brent Oil
93.36
(
-3.74%
)
Bitcoin
75,709.40
(
-0.18%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 159799
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

clarity789

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 213
Posts 8379
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/18/2006

clarity789

Re: mainuh post# 95245

Wednesday, 12/19/2007 9:04:17 AM

Wednesday, December 19, 2007 9:04:17 AM

Post# of 159799
No - never was. The wording was specific - invalidly issued shares.

Shareholder lawsuit, same thing. All the 10Q's and 10K's same thing.

No one was ever charged with counterfeiting. Thats just been the pump here for 2 years, and it blinded everybody. And it still does.

You can't really believe the DTC/SEC/NASDAQ would force a company to cover counterfeits...

Whether valid or invalid... it is BCIT that issued the shares. And it is BCIT that must cover them.

Those who believe without reason... cannot be convinced by reason

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today