Moreover, the judgment is a certainity. Any agreement with cbay is open to dispute because no one is certain if the "new ceo" is what he represents himself to be. If the new ceo was hostile in the alleged takeover, why wasn't nevada law followed, and what makes you think Pawson has even turned the corporate records over to him by now. Hard to do anything without records, and Pawson has his reasons to not turn over cbay records. JMHO.