SPIN: It pleases me when you take care to label what you're writing as something you presume to be the case or something you suspect to be true. Much better than when you publish your presumptions and suspicions without labeling them as such.
I take it that you agree that if there is any mutuality of obligation on the "vig" then it is forged in some document we've not seen.
I think your presumption and assuredness about the 2% lookback just because there is a 2% per month cost of delay shows your lack of objectivity. There could be a look back but that isn't obvious to me.
Your comment about Peter is also a sign of little objectivity. I agree the way ti was handled was totally unacceptable and he should have paid it off through sales on the below a buck financing. However when he paid it off after the run up, I recall you having a positive reaction - it i sonly now when you have changed your spots that you are spinning it as a pump.
You nay think I am not objective but I think I am and I try not to post so obnoxiously about everything.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
