I think your presumption and assuredness about the 2% lookback just because there is a 2% per month cost of delay shows your lack of objectivity. There could be a look back but that isn't obvious to me.
Your comment about Peter is also a sign of little objectivity. I agree the way ti was handled was totally unacceptable and he should have paid it off through sales on the below a buck financing. However when he paid it off after the run up, I recall you having a positive reaction - it i sonly now when you have changed your spots that you are spinning it as a pump.
You nay think I am not objective but I think I am and I try not to post so obnoxiously about everything.