Does the FUD department at Microsoft pay you by the word?
Fred
Footnote for those unfamiliar with the term:
FUD: "Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt"; a crop seeded with rumor uninhibited by fact. Microsoft is a well-known cultivator which is even more successful with it than Zeev with his turnips. Of course, Zeev has the handicap of being constrained by principle. flg
SCO (or) know the source of the source (or) The bottom line... is that nobody truly knows if SCO has a valid claim... (or) Follow the Money... SCOX: Basic Chart for SCO GROUP INC - Yahoo! Finance http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=SCOX&t=5y&l=off&z=m&q=l&c= ... as in, where on the share price chart did this claim by SCO occur, and might the raise in share price be connected, and if so, those inside this company that put the wrongful suit in place, can we agree without looking that they hold SCOX shares, and while a case for a Pump & Dump and using Insider Info can not be attached to company officials here for protecting the interests of the shareholders via a claim of stolen IP, gosh imagine what could of happened to iHub here about a year before iHub did a buy of SI, and possible sleezy lawyers at InfoSpace sued Sheriff Matt for: - using SI's IP via the mind of BobZ - removing a Turnip "feature" of SI (making it useless) - using that Turnip "feature" on iHub (to make iHub very useful) and while this is apples & oranges to SCOX's share price change via their legal action, even if the end result is case throwned out of the courts as unfounded and meaningless, iHub flounders when SI makes BobZ an offer to leave the coding of iHub to Matt and rejoin SI as Chief Coder, but but then places BobZ into a position that his code'n is not used, and legally BobZ cannot return to iHub unless he wants any future code'n he does be under a cloud. Here again, apples & oranges as SI's future was already written as a failure via InfoSpace, but iHub and BobZ's move'n up & up and onwards to greatness would be put into a muddy field, and while InfoSpace's share price would remain low and not take any benefit from that sleezing activity, folks at InfoSpace would have prevented their failure from being viewed using the The Matt & Bob TruTh of Light for Success to shine on the InfoSpace Burnt Out SiBulb of failure. ok, sorry babbling but, have any SCO insiders bought shares prior to that legal claim, and prior knowledge to the claim was Insider Info, but the claim was not clear-cut, as it could signal a sinking of SCOX shares based on thinking that their IP was stolen and unrecoverable, as well as increasing SCOX shares based on closing down the competition and/or receiving fees to use their IP. But then, I'am not a trader and don't watch SCOX's activity. As in, what year/month/day did SCO make that IP claim, and match it on that SCOX share price chart.
"burn in hell" (or) In the immortal words of Mozart's Requiem: Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis (The damned, cast away, shall be consigned to the searing flames)
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
