The Question and Answer Board

[gotmilk]

SCO (or) know the source of the source (or) The bottom line...
is that nobody truly knows if SCO has a valid claim...
(or)
Follow the Money...
SCOX: Basic Chart for SCO GROUP INC - Yahoo! Finance
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=SCOX&t=5y&l=off&z=m&q=l&c=
... as in,
where on the share price chart did this claim by SCO occur,
and might the raise in share price be connected,
and if so,
those inside this company that put the wrongful suit in place,
can we agree without looking that they hold SCOX shares,
and while a case for a Pump & Dump and using Insider Info
can not be attached to company officials here for protecting
the interests of the shareholders via a claim of stolen IP,
gosh imagine what could of happened to iHub here about
a year before iHub did a buy of SI, and possible sleezy lawyers
at InfoSpace sued Sheriff Matt for:
- using SI's IP via the mind of BobZ
- removing a Turnip "feature" of SI (making it useless)
- using that Turnip "feature" on iHub (to make iHub very useful)
and while this is apples & oranges to SCOX's share price change
via their legal action, even if the end result is case throwned out
of the courts as unfounded and meaningless, iHub flounders when
SI makes BobZ an offer to leave the coding of iHub to Matt and
rejoin SI as Chief Coder, but but then places BobZ into a position
that his code'n is not used, and legally BobZ cannot return to iHub
unless he wants any future code'n he does be under a cloud.
Here again, apples & oranges as SI's future was already written
as a failure via InfoSpace, but iHub and BobZ's move'n up & up
and onwards to greatness would be put into a muddy field,
and while InfoSpace's share price would remain low and not
take any benefit from that sleezing activity, folks at InfoSpace
would have prevented their failure from being viewed using the
The Matt & Bob TruTh of Light for Success
to shine on the InfoSpace Burnt Out SiBulb of failure.
ok, sorry babbling
but,
have any SCO insiders bought shares prior to that legal claim,
and prior knowledge to the claim was Insider Info,
but the claim was not clear-cut,
as it could signal a sinking of SCOX shares based on thinking
that their IP was stolen and unrecoverable, as well as increasing
SCOX shares based on closing down the competition and/or
receiving fees to use their IP.
But then, I'am not a trader and don't watch SCOX's activity.
As in, what year/month/day did SCO make that IP claim,
and match it on that SCOX share price chart.

doug